Settings
#1
Settings
As more of us are getting into the MS, and as many heads are better than one I've been thinking that we should probably start a settings page.
If we can work together to test and hopefully build on each other's settings then we should be able to develop a really strong default msq for the miata.
Here are my starting contributions; 1.8 NB engine, naturally aspirated.
MSnS-E 029h, Req Fuel 13.3
If we can work together to test and hopefully build on each other's settings then we should be able to develop a really strong default msq for the miata.
Here are my starting contributions; 1.8 NB engine, naturally aspirated.
MSnS-E 029h, Req Fuel 13.3
Last edited by Aussie Driver; 03-16-2006 at 12:44 AM.
#6
Hello,
Here are some screenies to help newcomers start from somewhat of a running base.
That VE table got me 27 mpg average on rush hour traffic. Wot is rich but I can only tune it with a NarrowBand sensor. Up to you to modify it to your liking.
The Accel is RPM base as it is giving me the best drivibility.
The cold start and ASE got me reliable start down to 15F. But it take 2 short crank to start it that cold. (it is starting at least )
Hope it can help and ask if you have any questions.
Edit: 1.8 N/A, Code 29J, Req 13.4
Here are some screenies to help newcomers start from somewhat of a running base.
That VE table got me 27 mpg average on rush hour traffic. Wot is rich but I can only tune it with a NarrowBand sensor. Up to you to modify it to your liking.
The Accel is RPM base as it is giving me the best drivibility.
The cold start and ASE got me reliable start down to 15F. But it take 2 short crank to start it that cold. (it is starting at least )
Hope it can help and ask if you have any questions.
Edit: 1.8 N/A, Code 29J, Req 13.4
#9
I haven't tested the following but it looks promising:
http://msefi.com/viewtopic.php?p=94291
You should be able to use these values in EasyTherm
Maybe this is an easier/cleaner alternative to fitting a GM CLT sensor?
http://msefi.com/viewtopic.php?p=94291
Stock specs for MX-5 coolant sensor:
(k-ohms)
-4F = 14.6-17.8
68F = 2.2-2.7
176F = 0.29-0.35
(k-ohms)
-4F = 14.6-17.8
68F = 2.2-2.7
176F = 0.29-0.35
Maybe this is an easier/cleaner alternative to fitting a GM CLT sensor?
#10
Just so you know, I used the averages of those and my coolant read about 165 when it was warmed up. So I just set up warmup enrich accordingly. Works well enough for me, but some may want something more precise I suppose.
All my fueling temp corrections are set to use the AIT, so that shouldn't be affected.
All my fueling temp corrections are set to use the AIT, so that shouldn't be affected.
#12
How do you N/A guys work out your VE tables? I used the following values and my VE table looks totally different:
Engine displacement: 1839cc
Idle: 800, 20
Peak torque: 121.7, 4500, 100
Peak HP: 142.2, 6500, 100
Redline: 7400, 100
I haven't tested it out yet but I would have thought since I got these figures from Mazda sources, they would be fairly accurate?
Engine displacement: 1839cc
Idle: 800, 20
Peak torque: 121.7, 4500, 100
Peak HP: 142.2, 6500, 100
Redline: 7400, 100
I haven't tested it out yet but I would have thought since I got these figures from Mazda sources, they would be fairly accurate?
#14
I'm now running keithmac's 029L4 code with the ignition idle control.
It's been running the car for the last four or so days and I'm really impressed with the improvement over the 029q2 idle control. The idle on the car doesn't 'bounce' anywhere near as much as it used to and for the first time I have been able to run the idle as 'closed loop' and it's a nice stable drop in revs from around 1500-1600rpm at startup.
If anyone is interested in giving it a go, I've attached my current settings below.
I've also included my current spark table (N/A) which is running more advance than the one I used to, and I've included my cranking settings and dwell control. Between the two, I'm really close to getting a factory startup.
Please note that I'm running a 99 engine from a 1.6 CAS and with 1.6 coils and ignitor. These settings may harm a NB engine running with 1.8 coils.
If you can make any improvement on these settings, please post them here for reference.
It's been running the car for the last four or so days and I'm really impressed with the improvement over the 029q2 idle control. The idle on the car doesn't 'bounce' anywhere near as much as it used to and for the first time I have been able to run the idle as 'closed loop' and it's a nice stable drop in revs from around 1500-1600rpm at startup.
If anyone is interested in giving it a go, I've attached my current settings below.
I've also included my current spark table (N/A) which is running more advance than the one I used to, and I've included my cranking settings and dwell control. Between the two, I'm really close to getting a factory startup.
Please note that I'm running a 99 engine from a 1.6 CAS and with 1.6 coils and ignitor. These settings may harm a NB engine running with 1.8 coils.
If you can make any improvement on these settings, please post them here for reference.
Last edited by Aussie Driver; 06-11-2006 at 04:06 AM.