New nylon/stainless bushing offering
#4
I agree, not trying to talk bad here, but sad fab is hobiests trying to help the community. Big difference than a business where productivity and customer service is key to keeping the doors open.
With that out of the way. Sadfab makes some great product.
This new option does seem like it has the potential to bind.
With that out of the way. Sadfab makes some great product.
This new option does seem like it has the potential to bind.
#6
probably due partly, to offering help in the way of drawings. Another miata parts shop informed me, more or less, that they are going to have MY coil bracket, my design made in China. Pulled the drawing straight from the Sadfab site. but dont worry, they arent going to pass the savings on to you. im sure.
#9
It’s kind of bs that it’s wrong as a consumer to want your parts in a timely manner. Many folks on here need the parts for actual racing and a waitlist of many months is not working.
Do we think sean is actually making a living off this? No way. If he was trying to, I’d think he’d become a real company and turn the production over to the big manufacturers.
Do we think sean is actually making a living off this? No way. If he was trying to, I’d think he’d become a real company and turn the production over to the big manufacturers.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 554
Total Cats: 77
It’s kind of bs that it’s wrong as a consumer to want your parts in a timely manner. Many folks on here need the parts for actual racing and a waitlist of many months is not working.
Do we thing sean is actually making a living off this? No way. If he was trying to, I’d think he’d become a real company and turn the production over to the big manufacturers.
Do we thing sean is actually making a living off this? No way. If he was trying to, I’d think he’d become a real company and turn the production over to the big manufacturers.
Now if he says it’ll be 2 weeks and then that turns to 6 that’s another story
#11
Sorry it sounds like I have bad feelings but yeah, the lack of customer service and The lack of having what you make in stock puts a damper on things.
Iv sent in a request, waited a while, got nothing back, sent a pm, got a response back 2 days later said maybe I’ll make them this weekend, said great no particular rush and well, thats 5 months ago.
Think I should ask again?
absolutly not. Ended up making it myself.
Iv sent in a request, waited a while, got nothing back, sent a pm, got a response back 2 days later said maybe I’ll make them this weekend, said great no particular rush and well, thats 5 months ago.
Think I should ask again?
absolutly not. Ended up making it myself.
#15
Thrust washers are an interesting difference.
I measured the stiction of my superpro bushes when I was removing them to regrease and add grease nipples and I found the stiction from the thrust loading to be more significant than the stiction from resistance to rotation of the sleeve inside the bush.
Note that this was with just the OEM bolt torque, it would be worse with the higher torques that are needed on the front lower. Also, the Superpros have a reduced thrust contact in some areas to reduce this stiction, so I would guess stiction from axial loading would be even more significant with the energy suspension bushes.
I measured the stiction of my superpro bushes when I was removing them to regrease and add grease nipples and I found the stiction from the thrust loading to be more significant than the stiction from resistance to rotation of the sleeve inside the bush.
Note that this was with just the OEM bolt torque, it would be worse with the higher torques that are needed on the front lower. Also, the Superpros have a reduced thrust contact in some areas to reduce this stiction, so I would guess stiction from axial loading would be even more significant with the energy suspension bushes.
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,108
Total Cats: 233
Seems to be one big difference between these and the SadFab bushings, which is critical to how the miata suspension works, which is addressed in the SadFab kit but not these. I am very happy w/ the SadFab bushings I have (LCAs plus spherical sleeves for rear uprights). Yes, you have to wait and get in the queue, but suspension upgrades aren't something most people do in the spur of the moment, so having to wait a little bit to get them really shouldn't be an issue.
#17
Either way, this kit is more in line with a Delrin setup. Delrin bushings already have the Delrin acting as a very low-friction thrust bearing where applicable.
#18
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,142
Eh, only so many ways to make a bushing. I've released a lot of these design with the idea that if you have the ability to make them yourself, then you probably have the ability to measure a control arm bore, etc. My data just saves you from having to pull a car apart or buy spare arms to measure and do the R&D. If they used my data to make their kit, shame on them(Not implying they did this at all), but they would have made the kit anyway, because they have the means and skill.
Lets not forgot delrin bushings were being made by others, before sadfab was a thing.
Yup. Having said the above, cheap 3d printer kits and job shops have kind of ruined my utopia. Because of this I have pulled down a few of my designs and will never release another. Bushing dimensions remain, but things that are easy to farm out or 3d print are no longer being shared.
I totally dropped the ball on you Tarek, and I apologize. You have an email.
He has every right. He is one of the few people I can count on 2 fingers that I have totally spaced out.
On your 2nd point: I used to be very good at setting accurate ETAs and sticking to them, but I am so overwhelmed now, I am having a very difficult time even forecasting out my backorders, let alone following up on them, for certain products (bushing kits especially).
This kit competes with delrin kits, and to compare them to poly isn't fair. With delrin, the flange is the thrust face and functionally is no different than countersinking it with a stepped washer like A1 has done. The washer is nice, but I see it as an unnecessary expense. There's really no way to incorporate a thrust element with the poly kits with the spacial constraints we have to work with, unfortunately.
First I've hard of this, and probably due to the crush sleeve being shorter than the bushing assembly, if I had to guess and based off what I've heard from other customers who have owned superpro bushes. This would also explain why you think what you've written below is accurate.
That's not how this works. If the bushing is made correctly, bolt torque has absolutely 0 to do with thrust loading on the bushing face as the steel sleeve is supposed to take the "crush" force from the suspension hardware, not the bushing itself. Hence the term "crush sleeve". If you get increased binding with increased bolt torque, then the steel sleeve is too short for the bushing assy.
Lets not forgot delrin bushings were being made by others, before sadfab was a thing.
It’s kind of bs that it’s wrong as a consumer to want your parts in a timely manner. Many folks on here need the parts for actual racing and a waitlist of many months is not working.
Do we think sean is actually making a living off this? No way. If he was trying to, I’d think he’d become a real company and turn the production over to the big manufacturers.
Do we think sean is actually making a living off this? No way. If he was trying to, I’d think he’d become a real company and turn the production over to the big manufacturers.
Sorry it sounds like I have bad feelings but yeah, the lack of customer service and The lack of having what you make in stock puts a damper on things.
Iv sent in a request, waited a while, got nothing back, sent a pm, got a response back 2 days later said maybe I’ll make them this weekend, said great no particular rush and well, thats 5 months ago.
Think I should ask again?
absolutly not. Ended up making it myself.
Iv sent in a request, waited a while, got nothing back, sent a pm, got a response back 2 days later said maybe I’ll make them this weekend, said great no particular rush and well, thats 5 months ago.
Think I should ask again?
absolutly not. Ended up making it myself.
On your 2nd point: I used to be very good at setting accurate ETAs and sticking to them, but I am so overwhelmed now, I am having a very difficult time even forecasting out my backorders, let alone following up on them, for certain products (bushing kits especially).
This kit competes with delrin kits, and to compare them to poly isn't fair. With delrin, the flange is the thrust face and functionally is no different than countersinking it with a stepped washer like A1 has done. The washer is nice, but I see it as an unnecessary expense. There's really no way to incorporate a thrust element with the poly kits with the spacial constraints we have to work with, unfortunately.
Note that this was with just the OEM bolt torque, it would be worse with the higher torques that are needed on the front lower. Also, the Superpros have a reduced thrust contact in some areas to reduce this stiction, so I would guess stiction from axial loading would be even more significant with the energy suspension bushes.
Last edited by hi_im_sean; 01-07-2019 at 04:33 PM.
#19
I'm curious how you measured the components independently, since this is more or less the exact opposite of the anecdotal observations of nearly everyone else who's looked at friction on the sleeve vs. the thrust face.
Either way, this kit is more in line with a Delrin setup. Delrin bushings already have the Delrin acting as a very low-friction thrust bearing where applicable.
Either way, this kit is more in line with a Delrin setup. Delrin bushings already have the Delrin acting as a very low-friction thrust bearing where applicable.
I measured the stiction with 2 measurements.
- The first was measuring the torque (with a torque wrench) that it would take to spin the crush tube in the bush. (I used a bolt and nut torqued up, so if I turned the head of the bolt, the crush tube would rotate).
- I measured the thrust stiction by setting the wishbone level, torquing one bolt, eg front lower front, while loosening front lower rear, and measuring the force required to break the stiction by lifting at the hole which the ball joint attaches and compared with the bolt loosened. With a basic force distance calculation, I converted this into a torque.
One other point to add, my car, being in the UK, is likely a lot rustier than the ones people have on here. After taking these measurements, I cleaned up the thrust faces on the subframe and painted them to reduce stiction.
First I've hard of this, and probably due to the crush sleeve being shorter than the bushing assembly, if I had to guess and based off what I've heard from other customers who have owned superpro bushes. This would also explain why you think what you've written below is accurate.
That's not how this works. If the bushing is made correctly, bolt torque has absolutely 0 to do with thrust loading on the bushing face as the steel sleeve is supposed to take the "crush" force from the suspension hardware, not the bushing itself. Hence the term "crush sleeve". If you get increased binding with increased bolt torque, then the steel sleeve is too short for the bushing assy.
It may be minor, but my thought was the extra crush of the crush tube and extra distortion of the subframe ears with a higher torque, would lead to more compression of the bush, ie more preload (and so stiction), though likely minor, I only meant to point out how it acted directionally.
Anyway, no denying a Sadfab sleeve'd kit with Energy Suspension bushings would be better than a set of Superpros, I was just pointing out that I'd found thrust stiction to be significant on the superpros and that if the sleeve'd Energy Suspension bushings had super low crush tube to bush stiction, then the thrust stiction may play a bigger percentage role.
#20
Anyway, no denying a Sadfab sleeve'd kit with Energy Suspension bushings would be better than a set of Superpros, I was just pointing out that I'd found thrust stiction to be significant on the superpros and that if the sleeve'd Energy Suspension bushings had super low crush tube to bush stiction, then the thrust stiction may play a bigger percentage role.
Considering the smaller but significant amount of surface area making contact at the subframe ears I'm surprised no one has made similar observations in this thread yet.