Supercharger Dual Throttle Project
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
From: Toronto, Canada
Supercharger Dual Throttle Project
I'm looking for help with a supercharger project. I'm copying a dual throttle body install from the UK onto my 2000 with MP62. I have a Big Throttle Body at the charger inlet and the stock TB on the inlet. I'm trying to find a coupe of silicone tees to connect up a recirculation valve and I figured who better than a bunch of turbo experts. Does anyone know of a company that makes odd-ball sizes of silicone? Specifically I want 2-3/4" inlet and outlet with 1" side port and 2-1/2" inlet and outlet with 1-3/8" side port. My searches have found nothing so far.
(I'm in Toronto, Canada)
(I'm in Toronto, Canada)
#3
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
From: Toronto, Canada
a) Outlet of AFM to BRP Sleeve (2-3/4")
b) As a sleeve over the metal cross-over pipe with a 1-3/8' hole in the cross-over pipe. (2-1/2")
#5
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
From: Toronto, Canada
Try these guys out: Intercooler Pipe Fabrication - Silicone Intake Systems Auto Parts
I've also tried these without success.
Silicone Vacuum Hose - StylinMotors.com, StylinMotors Inc.
Blow Off Valve Adapter Hose, BOV Adapter Hose, BOV Hoses, Blow Off Valve Hose, Blow Off Valve Hoses
Turbo Hose — 90° Elbow with 1" Nipple— Silicone
#9
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
From: Toronto, Canada
I've been running my s/c in the normal configuration for a couple of years and I only have one goal in mind - to get rid of the idle dip which on a cool morning in Toronto causes stalls at traffic lights until the engine warms right through. Reports from the MX5nutz in the UK report the DTB WILL do this.
#10
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
From: Toronto, Canada
DIY Custom Silicone Couplers - DSM Forums
Here's the link
Here's the link
Oh boy, I can see me getting into all kinds of trouble from the missus if I try to do that in the kitchen.
#11
Plenty of evidence to the conterary in the UK....
In my experience running a charger unthrottled is deafeningly loud and extremly unplesant. Having two throttles removes this and solves all idle and throttle response issues.
You can also have any IC pipework route you like which means a DIY around the rad option is feasible.
#14
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 469
Total Cats: 25
From: Toronto, Canada
I've been following the threads on MX5Nutz and a few of us in Canada are waiting on the kit from PJB to arrive. I ordered tees from Turbohoses, not exactly the right size but I'll adapt. I'd be interested in your thoughts of using a recirc valve or just cracking the blower TB at idle.
#15
Point taken.
I've been running my s/c in the normal configuration for a couple of years and I only have one goal in mind - to get rid of the idle dip which on a cool morning in Toronto causes stalls at traffic lights until the engine warms right through. Reports from the MX5nutz in the UK report the DTB WILL do this.
I've been running my s/c in the normal configuration for a couple of years and I only have one goal in mind - to get rid of the idle dip which on a cool morning in Toronto causes stalls at traffic lights until the engine warms right through. Reports from the MX5nutz in the UK report the DTB WILL do this.
#17
Regarding physics
"but you can't kid physics, a smaller intake track is better period, end of."
HP X 1.62 = airflow in CFM
stock miata size
55mm TB flows 317 cfm
317/1.62 = 195 hp at the crank.
With 17% drivetrain loss thats means you have a restriction at anything over 162 wheel horsepower.
Don't get me wrong reducing intake track total volume will help throttle response, but if that's your focus do it by using an air to water intercooler to shorten up the piping. Don't use a diameter of pipe or tb that is too small to flow the air you need without causing a restriction. I presume you're shooting for more than 162 whp, and this project will cost you hp.
HP X 1.62 = airflow in CFM
stock miata size
55mm TB flows 317 cfm
317/1.62 = 195 hp at the crank.
With 17% drivetrain loss thats means you have a restriction at anything over 162 wheel horsepower.
Don't get me wrong reducing intake track total volume will help throttle response, but if that's your focus do it by using an air to water intercooler to shorten up the piping. Don't use a diameter of pipe or tb that is too small to flow the air you need without causing a restriction. I presume you're shooting for more than 162 whp, and this project will cost you hp.
Last edited by GIGAPUNK; 12-19-2009 at 11:07 PM.
#19
I'm already at 220 and know someone pushing 280 ... The extra tb made no noticable difference in power, a/w I tried it's ok nut can't cope after a few laps on track , it's also still a longer intake tract...
You can band theory about all you like, in practice it works!!!
You can band theory about all you like, in practice it works!!!
Just cuz your butt can't discern the lost 5 hp doesn't mean they're not gone.