I Stupidcharged my car, wanna fight about it
#122
You did say your setup was the same cost as a proper, non-greddy turbo setup. I'm not going to argue which is better since we both have very one off setups with boost producing units that are the pinnacle of their the current respective tech. I'm limited by my 5 speed in the power department, but as long as you're over 3k rpm, the delay between the foot and the torque feels the same as my old M62 air to water in the manifold setup, even on just the wastegate.
However, around the really slow corners (~3kish, like you said), it's still night and day. At speed (4k+), the throttle was still pretty much a rheostat to boost. I can definitely give it that. Unfortunately, in autocross, performance around 3k matters a lot, especially in slowass bus stops like they seem to love to put on nationals courses these days. :(
Especially driving around on the street, I love pulling out to pass at 2000 RPMs in 5th gear and having gobs of torque. I would definitely have to downshift to get anything out of even a newer turbo down there.
#124
Why are you doing 2k in 5th? How slow is that, I cant remember. I do know that on the wastegate only I hit positive pressures at 45mph in 5th, and it definitely scoots more than the engine did before the turbo went on. I think our cars must be geared drastically differently though. I'm still in boost going through a 17in/12out chicago box (which is under the legal size limit but was in the evo school course).
#125
Why are you doing 2k in 5th? How slow is that, I cant remember. I do know that on the wastegate only I hit positive pressures at 45mph in 5th, and it definitely scoots more than the engine did before the turbo went on. I think our cars must be geared drastically differently though. I'm still in boost going through a 17in/12out chicago box (which is under the legal size limit but was in the evo school course).
#127
It is different needs, it comes down to, is the time spent downshifting to first, just to spin the tires off the car , then upshifting back to 2nd worth it. Or is it faster to bog for a few tenths. 9 times out of 10 downshifting to 1st wont be worth it because nailing that heel toe short braking zone is damn hard to do when you only have 3 tries to get it right.
#130
Having just driven the Wootton's car this past weekend in Blytheville, new turbo tech is certainly much better than old tech. They're running whatever the new hot **** Borg-Werner EFR is, and it would run circles around the setup on my old Alltrac.
However, around the really slow corners (~3kish, like you said), it's still night and day. At speed (4k+), the throttle was still pretty much a rheostat to boost. I can definitely give it that. Unfortunately, in autocross, performance around 3k matters a lot, especially in slowass bus stops like they seem to love to put on nationals courses these days. :(
Especially driving around on the street, I love pulling out to pass at 2000 RPMs in 5th gear and having gobs of torque. I would definitely have to downshift to get anything out of even a newer turbo down there.
However, around the really slow corners (~3kish, like you said), it's still night and day. At speed (4k+), the throttle was still pretty much a rheostat to boost. I can definitely give it that. Unfortunately, in autocross, performance around 3k matters a lot, especially in slowass bus stops like they seem to love to put on nationals courses these days. :(
Especially driving around on the street, I love pulling out to pass at 2000 RPMs in 5th gear and having gobs of torque. I would definitely have to downshift to get anything out of even a newer turbo down there.
On the track is where my car shines. Never lower than 3rd instead of never higher than second is quite a different application.
#135
FRT,
Hope you are doing well and still check this thread from time to time. I installed the M45 you sold me. You included a coupler and oil with the unit as it was making some noise on deceleration when I first installed it. I assumed this was the coupler being worn. Well I changed the oil and coupler, the grinding noise on deceleration is still present. I am beginning to think that the unit you sold may have a bad bearing. Were you aware of this when you sold it?
Hope you are doing well and still check this thread from time to time. I installed the M45 you sold me. You included a coupler and oil with the unit as it was making some noise on deceleration when I first installed it. I assumed this was the coupler being worn. Well I changed the oil and coupler, the grinding noise on deceleration is still present. I am beginning to think that the unit you sold may have a bad bearing. Were you aware of this when you sold it?
#136
I'm a terrible person
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
Yes I still check this. I did not have any issues with a grinding noise. If the bearing is bad, or beginning to go bad, I had no prior knowledge. According to the manufacture they shouldn't need any major maintenance until after 100k. When I had it on my car it ran fine with no issues.
#137
Oh it does run fine and makes about 5.5 pounds of boost as it should, it just a growling kinda noise on low rpm deceleration. Its quiet at idle and only does it under load really.I think its coming from the rear of the blower, but its hard to tell as it only makes the noise under the conditions I described above.
#140
I'm a terrible person
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,174
Total Cats: 180
That is very odd. I would think a bad bearing would be present under most conditions. A rattle that becomes pronounced under certain frequencies seems like more of the issue. It may not be the SC at all. Are you sure something else near/around it isn't loose, or touching something causing a rattle?