Miata Time Attack Takeover: Gridlife 2018 edition
#81
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,304
Total Cats: 1,225
There's nothing wrong with Swift springs. They are one of the better brands out there, with some of the lowest coil count for a given spring rate among spring manufacturers. Swift is up there with Eibach and Hyperco. Which is better than the others depends mostly on who you talk to and where you get your biased news.
#82
I can't find the article at the moment, but I read from some chassis engineer in a pro series that the Swift springs aren't nearly as consistent compared to the advertised rate as Hyperco and Eibach.
And I typically only see companies like Fortune Auto and the like offering them as an upgrade over whatever their stock garbage brand is.
And I typically only see companies like Fortune Auto and the like offering them as an upgrade over whatever their stock garbage brand is.
#83
Facebook Post
Recent testing for Kyle Engineering (who has designed my new wing) shows that the GTC200 wing has issues with separation at the mounts! By the way Kyle Forster is very easy to deal with if you wanted him to do some design work for you. If you get a chance meet him in person as well.
Facebook Post
This is modeling that Kyle has done that shows the impacts of the mounts on the GTC200, this supports the video above. I have posted this info in the aero thread as well. The wing that was designed is a dual element however the gap between the elements is minimal and taping it up would have no real impact in your class. The calcs show about 500kg of downforce at 300kmh and has LESS drag than the GTC200, bonus.
You need to work on reducing drag. The rules made no mention of being able to use a bumper cut, this alone will reduce drag by significant amounts. A bumper cut would be a better choice than a rear difusser because of the rule limitations.
#84
Do you have any good data on the bumper cut to share?
__________________
#85
This was done at Queensland Raceway last year. It is an acceleration plot down the back straight. The Blue dots are when the car had its bumper 'trimmed' and the red dots are with the full bumper and difusser. The good thing about this form od data analysis is that I can use any track as it is about acceleration and I can set the parameters to suit.
Data from the sprint session also shows the same trend, acceleration has improved. It should be noted that there was over a 20°c intake air temp difference with the two laps.
The real reason why I was not faster with less drag was driver error :( The 'early' brake into T3 really did cause some time to be lost, this was on the sprint layout above (green - PB with bumper cut/difusser and orange with cut bumper)
Lastly my comments on the day I first tested the cut bumper (butt dyno). I had to increase the rear wing AOA to keep it under control. This was more than likely a result of the weight removed as well as the less drag. I'm going to corner weight the car soon and reset the corner weights.
As tested
This was the bumper cut and the difusser installed, I have data on this as well. However not home for a few days so can post it then.
This is the next bumper cut I will test, not as aggressive as the one above.
Before with Full bumper and Jetstream difusser. I have to get and do some more dirt sprints it is so much fun! The car is used the same as it is on the track, no change in heights etc.
Data from the sprint session also shows the same trend, acceleration has improved. It should be noted that there was over a 20°c intake air temp difference with the two laps.
The real reason why I was not faster with less drag was driver error :( The 'early' brake into T3 really did cause some time to be lost, this was on the sprint layout above (green - PB with bumper cut/difusser and orange with cut bumper)
Lastly my comments on the day I first tested the cut bumper (butt dyno). I had to increase the rear wing AOA to keep it under control. This was more than likely a result of the weight removed as well as the less drag. I'm going to corner weight the car soon and reset the corner weights.
As tested
This was the bumper cut and the difusser installed, I have data on this as well. However not home for a few days so can post it then.
This is the next bumper cut I will test, not as aggressive as the one above.
Before with Full bumper and Jetstream difusser. I have to get and do some more dirt sprints it is so much fun! The car is used the same as it is on the track, no change in heights etc.
Last edited by Eipgam; 01-10-2018 at 12:42 AM.
#87
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Murfreesboro,TN
Posts: 2,079
Total Cats: 283
I have a theory as to why bumper cut data is so skewed. It depends on what sort of rear muffler you're using. A standard transverse muffler fills in a lot of the gap people assume is trapping the air. Look at a lot of OEMs you'll see more and more use of mufflers as a flow control (as well as packaging). I remember reading an article somewhere about an engineer who talked about how the muffler setup was specifically placed to reduce drag on a certain car (vague I know, sorry). So a straight pipe or center exit is really going to leave more volume for the air to take up. In theory if you could make your own muffler, you could design it to perfectly fill in the area between the subframe and rear bumper for drag reduction. It would just need to be lighter than standard.
#89
Another super uncontrolled test, but... a few years ago at an open track day I decided to do a quick and dirty test of rear bumper drag. I ran a session with the stock bumper in place, a session with the bumper fully removed, another session with, and another session without. The only data I was looking at was lap time and max straightaway mph on the AIM Solo, and neither of them saw consistent enough changes to attribute to bumper drag.
#91
A few notes on the data.
On the day the main testing was done with the bumper cut, yes the car was running 225/40/15 tyres. The previous testing was done on 205/50/15 tyres, however the software was changed to take this into account. Racepak data is stored with the parameters when it is recorded. Even if the change was not done I use a formula to correct that channel and model of this channel.
First test
This was done with the cut bumper and the difusser still in place, plus I was heat cycling the 225/40 tyres and none of this data has been used in the posts with the exception of the G Plots. What it does show was that the wing angle needed to be changed as the car was oversteering in high speed corners. Whilst drifting maybe fun, it is not when trying to do a fast lap. Therefore this day was more about finding the right setup to do some proper testing.
Acceleration channel
Within the Racepak software I created a maths Chanel called ACCEL = 'Accel G'*9.80665. This converts the Accel G into acceleration m/sec², then I smoothed it to 100. Acceleration can be impacted by change in power, drag and or weight (F=ma). This data is from 2015 and 2017 at World Time Attack, this time the car was running the same tyres and uncut bumper however a different splitter, power had increased by 6 RWHP and a few other minor changes. The data could be made more accurate by excluding any data points where there was a lateral G force however I do not believe in filtering data as it can then be misrepresented. I'm not saying that there is a correlation for decreased drag and the bumper cut as this would need to be proved statistically and in controlled testing. I'm not a consistent enough driver to do this testing nor do I have the funds to do controlled testing. The data shows that something has made the car accelerate faster, why is it so?
This is where Kyle Forster steps in. At WTAC 2017 he had some suggestions to try to reduce the drag on the car. One was to decrease the rear wing angle as he commented that this should have been done when the air dam was installed as I pointed out I have not played with the wing angle in a very long time. The wing was backed off to about 2° from 10°. Car was very twitchy going through T1 at SMSP and did not inspire confidence, hence was no faster. A few more practice sessions and a few tweaks to the wing angle a suitable angle was found. I manged a PB at WTAC 2017 without the bumper cut. Hence why I am now working with Kyle on the new wing, next will be a splitter that takes advantage of the Clubsprint rules.
This may not help in the bumper debate, but it is something
#92
There's nothing wrong with Swift springs. They are one of the better brands out there, with some of the lowest coil count for a given spring rate among spring manufacturers. Swift is up there with Eibach and Hyperco. Which is better than the others depends mostly on who you talk to and where you get your biased news.
You need to get them on a spring dyno and see for yourself, I used to say the same things you just did lol. Take measurements of physical dimensions before and after as well and note the differences in a set. Comparing them to Eibach and Hyperco is a stretch, there is a reason why red and dark blue springs dominate the pro motorsports world.
#93
You need to get them on a spring dyno and see for yourself, I used to say the same things you just did lol. Take measurements of physical dimensions before and after as well and note the differences in a set. Comparing them to Eibach and Hyperco is a stretch, there is a reason why red and dark blue springs dominate the pro motorsports world.
I also have yet to see spring dyno testing showing Swifts being inferior. So while i use Hyperco springs, i also still bother building and driving my car despite the fact that i don't have a factory-backed Ford GT Le Mans car.
Can you share the results of your spring dyno testing in which you saw this for yourself?
#97
The definition for parroting is to repeat or imitate without thought or understanding, so that's a pretty **** poor way to describe my post. I didn't tell you to believe me, I told you what to look for on your own in terms of actual data. Feel free to form your own conclusion after that.
Originally Posted by You
You need to get them on a spring dyno and see for yourself, I used to say the same things you just did lol. Take measurements of physical dimensions before and after as well and note the differences in a set. Comparing them to Eibach and Hyperco is a stretch, there is a reason why red and dark blue springs dominate the pro motorsports world.
#99
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
Call it whatever you want, but when someone alludes to the results of some proprietary testing data they've been privy to but cannot directly share, I tend to not look that gift horse in the mouth quite as hard as you seem to be.
#100
There wasn't alluding. There was "use this color spring, because reasons." I suspected there was testing, but heaven forbid i try to get more information.
Because as of right now, the only actual testing between the brands to be found on the internet shows Hyperco to be inferior. I don't believe that, so i use them anyways, and not the yeller/green springs. I just question things on the internet that don't have data behind it. Much as you do, and everyone else does on this forum. I thought.
There wasn't a "gift" here. We don't need to make this out to look like i'm ungrateful for something i didn't receive. Speaking of... email coming your way.
Because as of right now, the only actual testing between the brands to be found on the internet shows Hyperco to be inferior. I don't believe that, so i use them anyways, and not the yeller/green springs. I just question things on the internet that don't have data behind it. Much as you do, and everyone else does on this forum. I thought.
There wasn't a "gift" here. We don't need to make this out to look like i'm ungrateful for something i didn't receive. Speaking of... email coming your way.