The definitive "How do I catch can?" thread.
#181
Does anyone else have problems idling after reworking the crankcase ventilation system? I did enlarge the tiny hole on the driver's side and welded a threaded -10AN fitting to the valve cover. Since I'm still running N/A, I put a small breather filter on the fitting for now.
on the passenger side I'm running full -10AN lines as well. They are routed from the valve cover through a metal check valve, into a catch can, and from there to the inlet manifold
the problem is: even with the idle screw fully closed and the idle valve unplugged, it still idles at around 3000 RPM. The engine is simply pulling too much air through my ventilation system. My current plan is to put a restrictor into the line between the valve cover and the catch can. Thus I hope to choke the engine enough to keep the idle down where it belongs. At the same time this would hinder PCV, though.
on the passenger side I'm running full -10AN lines as well. They are routed from the valve cover through a metal check valve, into a catch can, and from there to the inlet manifold
the problem is: even with the idle screw fully closed and the idle valve unplugged, it still idles at around 3000 RPM. The engine is simply pulling too much air through my ventilation system. My current plan is to put a restrictor into the line between the valve cover and the catch can. Thus I hope to choke the engine enough to keep the idle down where it belongs. At the same time this would hinder PCV, though.
#182
Unlikely. The check valve is brand new. It is, however, massive compared to the stock valve. So are the -10 AN lines. If I remove the breather filter and cover the hole with my finger, idle returns back to normal. At the same time I can feel a massive vacuum sucking against my finger.
speaking of the check valve: theoretically when running naturally aspirated, there shouldn't ever be the need for one since the air and blowby gasses only go out through the valve, never IN...?
speaking of the check valve: theoretically when running naturally aspirated, there shouldn't ever be the need for one since the air and blowby gasses only go out through the valve, never IN...?
#187
Rings are supposedly sealing well. Block was bored and honed, and new supertech pistons with Wiseco rings installed. It's not blowby that causes high idle, but rather the improved flow from the inlet (breather filter) through the valve cover and theVC outlet, through the catch can and into the intake manifold. Now that I understand the difference between check valves and PCV valves it makes sense. If I cap the inlet, idle returns to normal.
I will try using a PCV valve from a supercharged Mercedes C-Class
I will try using a PCV valve from a supercharged Mercedes C-Class
#188
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Goleta, Southern California
Posts: 520
Total Cats: 27
Or run a pcv valve. It closes (or nearly) at idle. Opens off idle. Closes under boost.
Or don't run the passenger side to the intake manifold.
You are running a check valve in the passenger side. What's the point of making that side bigger if it can't do anything under boost anyhow?
edit: I'm way late to this party
Or don't run the passenger side to the intake manifold.
You are running a check valve in the passenger side. What's the point of making that side bigger if it can't do anything under boost anyhow?
edit: I'm way late to this party
#190
Not venting to atmosphere keeps polar bears and German TÜV scrutineers happy. Of course I could run both VC lines to a shared catch can, and from there to the intake (pre-turbo). However, I was expecting better vacuum from the intake manifold than from a slash cut right behind my big *** cone filter
william, the check valve was installed to protect the crankcase from positive pressure when my EFR is in
william, the check valve was installed to protect the crankcase from positive pressure when my EFR is in
#192
Maybe something is lost in translation, but what exactly is wrong with my dual catch can setup?
[intake manifold] - [catch can #1] - [PCV] - [valve cover with baffles and copper scrubbers] - [catch can #2] - [slash-cut pre-turbo]
under cruise: a little bit of air enters through catch can #2 path, through valve cover and exits through PCV and catch can #1 along with blowby gasses and acidic waste. There the crappy oil mist is caught, while the air goes into the intake manifold. Active scavenging, polar bears happy.
under WOT: PCV shut, so only passive scavenging of blowby gasses, plus a little help from the slash-cut negative pressure. Any oil that makes it past the baffles inside the valve cover will be caught in catch can #2, before the gasses enter the intake pre-turbo.
I was thinking this is the proper way to do it for a dual duty car that sees both daily driving and track days.
[intake manifold] - [catch can #1] - [PCV] - [valve cover with baffles and copper scrubbers] - [catch can #2] - [slash-cut pre-turbo]
under cruise: a little bit of air enters through catch can #2 path, through valve cover and exits through PCV and catch can #1 along with blowby gasses and acidic waste. There the crappy oil mist is caught, while the air goes into the intake manifold. Active scavenging, polar bears happy.
under WOT: PCV shut, so only passive scavenging of blowby gasses, plus a little help from the slash-cut negative pressure. Any oil that makes it past the baffles inside the valve cover will be caught in catch can #2, before the gasses enter the intake pre-turbo.
I was thinking this is the proper way to do it for a dual duty car that sees both daily driving and track days.
#194
It's kind of hard to explain. What you describe sounds alright. Whether it works in practice I'm not sure. Use hoses with a larger I.D. (than stock), avoid kinks or sharp bends, and put the can at the highest point so that gravity doesn't work against you and fill the wrong stuff with oil. I just saw that you are running no boost. You might have idle issues because you connected a line to your intake manifold. Remove that check valve or whatever it is and either run a stock PCV valve or block off the port to the intake manifold. You might have to do some experimenting to see what works for you. Some people run dual catch cans etc.
#196
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
@bbundy didn't have any trouble with a block port, its working fine for him. He had trouble with the intake side breather. Under hard turns valve cover would fill with oil and then get sucked out.
The block vent worked fine for him, (and I drilled one on my block). So now he runs a block vent (behind the alternator) And the exhaust side of the valve cover to a catch can. And possibly sometimes an exhaust slashcut. He can explain more if he shows up.
The block vent worked fine for him, (and I drilled one on my block). So now he runs a block vent (behind the alternator) And the exhaust side of the valve cover to a catch can. And possibly sometimes an exhaust slashcut. He can explain more if he shows up.
#197
There it is: https://www.miataturbo.net/race-prep-75/should-i-drill-hole-my-engine-block-69247/
i'll try my dual can setup. If it fails, I'll cap the intake manifold intake, dump the PCV valve, and run both VC lines to a t-connector, from there to a catch can and then to the intake before the compressor wheel. Less vacuum, but less complexity at the same time
i'll try my dual can setup. If it fails, I'll cap the intake manifold intake, dump the PCV valve, and run both VC lines to a t-connector, from there to a catch can and then to the intake before the compressor wheel. Less vacuum, but less complexity at the same time
#200
Sorry to necro this thread but I'm about to put in a catch can due to not enjoying the smell of oil when I get fully into the boost for more than a couple of seconds.
My current plan is to go for maximum vacuum (even at idle) on the crankcase.
Both valve cover barbs into a Y, into the catch can inlet.
From the catch can outlet, a Y with two lines.
One side to the intake port, with a one way check valve (no PCV).
Other side to the pre-turbo filter area, with a one way check valve (no PCV).
My thinking is that I would pull 20in of vac at idle because there is no way for the crankcase to suck in any air except past the rings.
At boost I will still get decent vacuum in the crankcase because the pre turbo area will provide suction even when the intake is under pressure.
The check valves will prevent any positive pressure from flowing out of the intake manifold and the catch can will prevent any oil from getting into the intake.
Does this seem like it would work as intended or am I just asking for a high idle? There is going to be a decent volume of oxygen inside the crankcase at start, so I figure when I first start the engine it will take a while to evacuate.
Is there any harm to sucking 20-25in of vacuum in the crankcase? My thought is that it would drastically reduce the boiling temperature of any water vapor in the oil and facilitate removing it.
My current plan is to go for maximum vacuum (even at idle) on the crankcase.
Both valve cover barbs into a Y, into the catch can inlet.
From the catch can outlet, a Y with two lines.
One side to the intake port, with a one way check valve (no PCV).
Other side to the pre-turbo filter area, with a one way check valve (no PCV).
My thinking is that I would pull 20in of vac at idle because there is no way for the crankcase to suck in any air except past the rings.
At boost I will still get decent vacuum in the crankcase because the pre turbo area will provide suction even when the intake is under pressure.
The check valves will prevent any positive pressure from flowing out of the intake manifold and the catch can will prevent any oil from getting into the intake.
Does this seem like it would work as intended or am I just asking for a high idle? There is going to be a decent volume of oxygen inside the crankcase at start, so I figure when I first start the engine it will take a while to evacuate.
Is there any harm to sucking 20-25in of vacuum in the crankcase? My thought is that it would drastically reduce the boiling temperature of any water vapor in the oil and facilitate removing it.
Last edited by AlwaysBroken; 08-31-2017 at 05:04 PM.