TrackHQ vs Magazine Pro's Challenge
11-16-2010 | 03:22 PM
#1
TrackHQ vs Magazine Pro's Challenge
Bit of fun a bunch of us had a few weeks a go.
http://autoeclectic.com/trackhq
http://autoeclectic.com/
http://www.trackhq.com/forums/f2/tra...hallenge-3393/
http://autoeclectic.com/trackhq
http://autoeclectic.com/
http://www.trackhq.com/forums/f2/tra...hallenge-3393/
__________________
Reply
-1
-1
11-16-2010 | 03:25 PM
#2
lol at
The pros complained that the tires and brakes on the Evo were toast by the time they got to drive. So to prove it results were based on driver skill Emilio Cervantes took the Evo out for two more laps. What do you know, he drove a 2:10.46 within half a second of his original time and still half a second faster then our fastest professional driver
The pros complained that the tires and brakes on the Evo were toast by the time they got to drive. So to prove it results were based on driver skill Emilio Cervantes took the Evo out for two more laps. What do you know, he drove a 2:10.46 within half a second of his original time and still half a second faster then our fastest professional driver
Reply
0
0
11-16-2010 | 03:42 PM
#5
lol at
The pros complained that the tires and brakes on the Evo were toast by the time they got to drive. So to prove it results were based on driver skill Emilio Cervantes took the Evo out for two more laps. What do you know, he drove a 2:10.46 within half a second of his original time and still half a second faster then our fastest professional driver
The pros complained that the tires and brakes on the Evo were toast by the time they got to drive. So to prove it results were based on driver skill Emilio Cervantes took the Evo out for two more laps. What do you know, he drove a 2:10.46 within half a second of his original time and still half a second faster then our fastest professional driver
__________________
Reply
-1
-1
11-22-2010 | 04:20 PM
#16
Fantastic. Your top 4 all beat their number 1. Kinda glossed over that didn't they. Your top 7 beat their number 3. Didn't really mention that one either. Officially a complete drubbing of the "Pros".
1. Bob Faieta 2:11.03
2. Dieter Heinz 2:12.00
3. Micky Grana 2:12.74
4. Rob Morgan 2:13.38
5. Mark Gallardo 2:14.81
1. Emilio Cervantes 2:09.691
2. Jeff Tyler 2:10.681
3. Charles Ng 2:10.849
4. Sonny Watanasirisuk 2:10.938
5. Manly Kau 2:11.686
6. Rob Burgoon 2:12.250
7. AJ Latteri 2:12.301
8. Ryan Cashin 2:14.614
9. Kenny Chieu 2:14.815
10. Clint Boisdeau 2:15.780
11. William Chen 2:18.494
1. Bob Faieta 2:11.03
2. Dieter Heinz 2:12.00
3. Micky Grana 2:12.74
4. Rob Morgan 2:13.38
5. Mark Gallardo 2:14.81
1. Emilio Cervantes 2:09.691
2. Jeff Tyler 2:10.681
3. Charles Ng 2:10.849
4. Sonny Watanasirisuk 2:10.938
5. Manly Kau 2:11.686
6. Rob Burgoon 2:12.250
7. AJ Latteri 2:12.301
8. Ryan Cashin 2:14.614
9. Kenny Chieu 2:14.815
10. Clint Boisdeau 2:15.780
11. William Chen 2:18.494
Reply
0
0
11-22-2010 | 05:21 PM
#18
Minor issues but it was still fast. Felt like the left front damper was going away. Irregular pulsating from brakes that felt and looked like pad deposition. Still, the car was super fast and stopped amazingly well. You just had to ignore the pedal feel and twitchiness under braking.
__________________
Reply
-1
-1
