Are the NA parking light openings a high pressure zone?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 1,421
Total Cats: 95
Are the NA parking light openings a high pressure zone?
I have my intake for the air box on one side and a duct for the rotrex oil cooler on the other. I see lots of data for hood vents etc but none (that I found) discuss that area of the car.
#2
The head light lids aren't but I do believe a properly shaped NACA duct in the headlight lid will overcome that.
Currently I put the turn signal lights back in for better aero and am using a NACA headlight lid for engine intake.
Bob
#3
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 659
Total Cats: -15
Rise, O necrothread.
Been doing some pondering, and some searching. Lots of threads with info, but a lot of them are old, and as such, many of the pics in them are no longer available due to hosting issues. From what I gather, on an OEM NA body, the turn signal area is medium-high pressure. However, the headlight cover area just aft of there seems to be low (would it be called negative?) pressure. See top left pic:
It seems to me that turn signal intakes would do something (unsure how much) to get air into the engine compartment. However, I've also seen headlight covers with intakes, such as these:
Now, maybe the ducts generate some flow of cooler air into the openings from aerodynamic forces, but it seems like a lot of potential would be countered by the low pressure zone there sucking air out.
I'm thinking to do something similar to the louvered cover, above, except with the louvers facing the other direction, i.e. with the openings towards the aft. I think it would work better to enhance airflow through the engine compartment. The low pressure should help pull air out, without the aerodynamics trying to push air in. Obviously, vents or louvers on the hood would be more effective, simply because there's more surface area to work with, but it also takes a bigger commitment towards fabrication (due to the hood substructure) and practicality/streetability. I don't have that kind of commitment yet.
Thoughts on the theory, or am I just going the wrong direction entirely?
Been doing some pondering, and some searching. Lots of threads with info, but a lot of them are old, and as such, many of the pics in them are no longer available due to hosting issues. From what I gather, on an OEM NA body, the turn signal area is medium-high pressure. However, the headlight cover area just aft of there seems to be low (would it be called negative?) pressure. See top left pic:
It seems to me that turn signal intakes would do something (unsure how much) to get air into the engine compartment. However, I've also seen headlight covers with intakes, such as these:
Now, maybe the ducts generate some flow of cooler air into the openings from aerodynamic forces, but it seems like a lot of potential would be countered by the low pressure zone there sucking air out.
I'm thinking to do something similar to the louvered cover, above, except with the louvers facing the other direction, i.e. with the openings towards the aft. I think it would work better to enhance airflow through the engine compartment. The low pressure should help pull air out, without the aerodynamics trying to push air in. Obviously, vents or louvers on the hood would be more effective, simply because there's more surface area to work with, but it also takes a bigger commitment towards fabrication (due to the hood substructure) and practicality/streetability. I don't have that kind of commitment yet.
Thoughts on the theory, or am I just going the wrong direction entirely?
#7
NACA duct shapes seem to have the ability to suck air in from surfaces with less than optimal pressure differentials as long as there is fairly steady flow over them. They also tend to do it with much lower overall drag than a scoop like duct because they don't rely on stagnation pressure generating pressure differential to force flow through an opening rather they create a vortex that creates momentum in the direction to feed the opening.
Without a proper NACA shape I think the headlight lid becomes an outlet rather than an inlet.
Without a proper NACA shape I think the headlight lid becomes an outlet rather than an inlet.
#8
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,103
The lids are outlets. Relying on them to draw area from the back of the radiator is not something I'd try, unless you've gone through the trouble of perfectly sealing the engine bay forward of the radiator. My suspicion is that you will draw air from places that aren't the back of the radiator.
#10
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
my intake was DIRECTLY behind the opening and was boxed in from the engine bay.
I used to have a great pic, but this is best i can find:
#11
The lids are outlets. Relying on them to draw area from the back of the radiator is not something I'd try, unless you've gone through the trouble of perfectly sealing the engine bay forward of the radiator. My suspicion is that you will draw air from places that aren't the back of the radiator.
I ditched the turn signal intakes for reduced drag and I they were cirtainly detramental to engine cooling.
#12
The picture of the red headlight cover above with the nice carbon NACA duct might be misleading.
I have never seen one like that available, with square edges, long (proper) length to the duct itself etc.
Mine and any others I have seen have a short "approximation" of a NACA duct which is likely significantly less effective. From my research the square edges are a critical part of the design as is the length to width ratio.
I have been running my intake from down in front of the wheel in a sealed area but in the interests of shortening the intake tract am going back to the behind the headlight method in an effort to drop lower my spooling as best i can...due to big turbo, small engine etc.
As such I would love to know where to get one of these more realistic looking headlight cover NACA ducts!
I have never seen one like that available, with square edges, long (proper) length to the duct itself etc.
Mine and any others I have seen have a short "approximation" of a NACA duct which is likely significantly less effective. From my research the square edges are a critical part of the design as is the length to width ratio.
I have been running my intake from down in front of the wheel in a sealed area but in the interests of shortening the intake tract am going back to the behind the headlight method in an effort to drop lower my spooling as best i can...due to big turbo, small engine etc.
As such I would love to know where to get one of these more realistic looking headlight cover NACA ducts!
#15
the NACA duct is sourced from McKinney. Looks like he glassed it to the headlight lid, you can see where he cut the NACA shape out of it. As seen on revlimiter.net
revlimiter.net - NACA duct intake install
revlimiter.net - NACA duct intake install
#18
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 659
Total Cats: -15
So...are y'all saying using a NACA ducted lid as an inlet would be better than using a reverse-louvered lid as an outlet? I guess I can see Andrew's point about not drawing air from the radiator, since the louvers would basically be even with the radiator.
#19
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
what would the lid outlet?
that would only make sense if you did remove the turn signal, and put your filter where the headlight resides, then sealed it off completely. so air would flow through the opening and out the lid through the louvers.
otherwise they will only really do anything when youre parked...might as well do hood lifters while youre at it.
that would only make sense if you did remove the turn signal, and put your filter where the headlight resides, then sealed it off completely. so air would flow through the opening and out the lid through the louvers.
otherwise they will only really do anything when youre parked...might as well do hood lifters while youre at it.
#20
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,884
Total Cats: 3,075
The rear of the headlight doors is a low pressure area and would be a good place to vent pressure from under the hood according to the pressure charts posted on this forum. It is also rear of the radiator (not that it matters because the air flows in many directions beneath the hood).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zaphod
MEGAsquirt
47
10-26-2018 11:00 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM