Race Prep Miata race-only chat.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Adventures in PTE/TTE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2013 | 02:23 PM
  #41  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by b3d3g1
why not the 1.8 brakes? 1.6 calipers with 1.8 brackets and rotors.
Same +2pts as going all the way to the Trackspeed kit. If you change the bracket or rotor diameter, you take the points. My car is classed as a '90, so I have to go all the way back to stock calipers and stock rotor diameter to get the points back.
Old 03-12-2013 | 02:28 PM
  #42  
b3d3g1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 75
Total Cats: 24
From: Lakewood, CO
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Greenbaum allows you to class as a different model of the same platform as long as all the components that make it the other model will bolt to your tub and vice versa. Precedent was an FC RX7 turbo at nationals that was the n/a model with the turbo brakes and LSD, classed as the turbo. I did that at nationals with the MSM and promptly got 100lbs added to any MSM dyno class. (sorry!)

So any NB year can run Sport Brakes front and/or rear. Thus, classing and NA6 as an NA8 is OK. Someone could argue that a few of the studs welded to the bare tub are different but it's in the spirit of the rules so even at nationals no one will give you grief if your VIN doesn't match your PT form, provided it's on the same line or cross compatible as described above.
There seem to be some differences in opinion on this.
Old 03-12-2013 | 02:35 PM
  #43  
Red_5's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 23
Total Cats: 4
From: Santa Barbara
Default

Originally Posted by b3d3g1
There seem to be some differences in opinion on this.
I would certainly send an email to Greg explaining the situation. It's a waste of points classing a 1.6 PTF**. Tire size alone makes up the difference of going to PTE base class.

Of course with Andrew being on NASA's radar after pissing off the SoCal PTE RX-7 drivers, he might not want to re-class his car.
Old 03-12-2013 | 02:43 PM
  #44  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by b3d3g1
There seem to be some differences in opinion on this.
If you're looking for reason in the NASA classification system, you won't find it. It's a secret formula that cannot be discussed but is totally equitable...just like the BCS.
Old 03-12-2013 | 02:43 PM
  #45  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Red_5
I would certainly send an email to Greg explaining the situation. It's a waste of points classing a 1.6 PTF**. Tire size alone makes up the difference of going to PTE base class.

Of course with Andrew being on NASA's radar after pissing off the SoCal PTE RX-7 drivers, he might not want to re-class his car.
I wouldn't waste the keystrokes.
Old 03-12-2013 | 03:00 PM
  #46  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Red_5
I would certainly send an email to Greg explaining the situation. It's a waste of points classing a 1.6 PTF**. Tire size alone makes up the difference of going to PTE base class.
+1. Classing PTF is a huge mistake, since the base tire for F is 215mm. You just end up with less power.

PTF** on 205s: 19 + 6 (F**) + 1 (215-205) = 26pts to spend
PTE on 205s = 19 + 7 (235-205) = 26pts to spend
Old 03-12-2013 | 03:03 PM
  #47  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Red_5
Of course with Andrew being on NASA's radar after pissing off the SoCal PTE RX-7 drivers, he might not want to re-class his car.
NA8s aren't given as favorable a power to weight ratio as NA6s. I could reclass as an NA8 and get the 1.8 brakes, but I have to take a weight penalty for the privilege.
Old 03-12-2013 | 03:08 PM
  #48  
b3d3g1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 75
Total Cats: 24
From: Lakewood, CO
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
NA8s aren't given as favorable a power to weight ratio as NA6s. I could reclass as an NA8 and get the 1.8 brakes, but I have to take a weight penalty for the privilege.
ahhh, that's the part of the equation I didn't see. I think I'll still email Greg about reclassing as a NA8 so I have the option and to see what the weight penalty is.
Old 03-12-2013 | 03:32 PM
  #49  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

If you go that route, don't waste it on 1.8 brakes - switch to something lighter so you actually get some performance benefit out of it.
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:29 PM
  #50  
bellwilliam's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
Total Cats: 12
Default

edit: bad math..

Last edited by bellwilliam; 03-12-2013 at 04:42 PM.
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:38 PM
  #51  
rlogan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 733
Total Cats: 17
From: San Antonio
Default

I wish we could grow a decent TTE class here in Texas, I'd sure as hell rather do that than SM.
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:41 PM
  #52  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

My **** on a TTE* base at 2490/145whp

Tire
+6 = 225 NT-01
Drive-train
+3 six speed
+3 LSD
Suspension
+3 Dampers
+2 Springs
+2 Sway bar
Brakes
+2 BBC
Aero
+3 bumper/air dam
Subtotal
=24 points
+7 for the *
Grant Total:
+39 points putting me in TTD.

Last edited by hustler; 03-12-2013 at 05:57 PM.
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:48 PM
  #53  
bellwilliam's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Efini~FC3S
And then cheat like a mf'er because NASA will never tech you past dyno'ing you and weighing you after you come off the track.

Even at Nationals the PT tech is laughable.

I finished on the podium in PTB a few years ago, I was blown away by how little they checked. I was disappointed because my car was completely legal, I should have been cheated up...
I wouldn't exactly say that. example was Crusher.
just few weeks prior to National, Crusher was thoroughly combed over by Socal tech, sent to dyno, then have Traqmate installed in it for the later race (which it went faster).

of course it is possible to cheat after this regional race just prior to the runoff. but Greg already had an idea how fast Crusher is compared to others (some other socal that also won and podium the national). As long as Crusher did not suddenly go another couple of seconds faster, there is no need to go over it with find tooth comb....

Last edited by bellwilliam; 03-12-2013 at 05:06 PM.
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:50 PM
  #54  
ThePass's Avatar
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,304
Total Cats: 1,225
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
brakes
+2 bbc
?
Bbk?
__________________
Ryan Passey
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:52 PM
  #55  
bellwilliam's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
Total Cats: 12
Default

My **** on a TTE* base at 2490/145whp

Tire
+6 = 225 NT-01
Drive-train
+3 six speed
+3 LSD
Suspension
+3 Dampers
+2 Springs
+2 Sway bar
Brakes
+2 BBC
Aero
+3 bumper/air dam
Subtotal
=24 points
+7 for the *
Grant Total:
+31 points putting me in TTD.

if I were you, I would run 205 RR or Hoosier. NASA points system really penalize wider (as what's said on the side wall, not the actual width). or if you have enough hp, go to 225 Hoosier.

Last edited by hustler; 03-12-2013 at 05:57 PM. Reason: Math fail
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:58 PM
  #56  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Efini~FC3S
And then cheat like a mf'er because NASA will never tech you past dyno'ing you and weighing you after you come off the track.
Go fast enough and they will spend plenty of time teching. I spent ~4hrs in tech at a regional race last year after outqualifying P2 by ~2sec. Weight, ~60 minutes on the dyno, and full engine bay and chassis inspection.
Old 03-12-2013 | 04:59 PM
  #57  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,433
Default

Originally Posted by bellwilliam
if I were you, I would run 205 RR or Hoosier. NASA points system really penalize wider (as what's said on the side wall, not the actual width). or if you have enough hp, go to 225 Hoosier.
+1

NASA PT rules favor the R6 and the smallest size than you can get to work on any given car. Crusher on 205's with 170whp as an example.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Old 03-12-2013 | 05:00 PM
  #58  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by bellwilliam
if I were you, I would run ??????????????. NASA points system really penalize wider (as what's said on the side wall, not the actual width). or if you have enough hp, go to 225 Hoosier.
I don't have money for 8" wheels and I can't afford $800-1000 in tires every other weekend.
Old 03-12-2013 | 05:01 PM
  #59  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

zOMG, SHUT UP ABOUT THE TIRE WIDTH!!!! I want to win.
Old 03-12-2013 | 05:10 PM
  #60  
bellwilliam's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 384
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
I don't have money for 8" wheels and I can't afford $800-1000 in tires every other weekend.
?? you run 205 and 225 Hoosier on your 9"
true that Hoosier heat cycles out too fast. that's why I will only use Hoosier selectively....



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.