oil cooler
#4
Originally Posted by kung fu jesus
most i've seen are an adapter plate that screws onto the oilfilter nipple. the oem filter then screws onto that. the plate has two outlets. one goes to the cooler, the other is a return.
But that means you have to have the oil filter relocation thingie??? right??
#5
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Originally Posted by mx5adam
But that means you have to have the oil filter relocation thingie??? right??
Several other companies make products similar to this which are considerably less expensive, but I'm not aware of any which have a built-in thermostat. This should give you an idea of what they look like inside: http://tinyurl.com/oazlx
Look around Summit Racing under Oil Filter Adapters and Remote Oil Thermostats. Actually, the FM product is not that badly priced when you add up the cost of a sandwich adapter, a remote thermostat, and the -AN / NPT fittings you'll need to go between the two. I bought mine from FM simply because it was the cleanest, most compact solution.
#6
The FM sandwich plate is a great unit because it incorporates the ability to run an oil cooler and oil thermostat.
I was going through Moss Motor's catalogue and came across this:
http://www.miatamania.com/Shop/ViewP...eIndexID=39638
This is the unit I am going to get when I do my oil cooler. For ~$300 you get the oil filter relocation kit, the whole oil cooler and all lines/fittings/etc. and you get a thermostat so that the cooler doesn't kick in until the oil is the proper temperature. The mounting plate for the oil filter also has an extra barb that you can run aline off of straight to the turbo if you want.
-Ryan
I was going through Moss Motor's catalogue and came across this:
http://www.miatamania.com/Shop/ViewP...eIndexID=39638
This is the unit I am going to get when I do my oil cooler. For ~$300 you get the oil filter relocation kit, the whole oil cooler and all lines/fittings/etc. and you get a thermostat so that the cooler doesn't kick in until the oil is the proper temperature. The mounting plate for the oil filter also has an extra barb that you can run aline off of straight to the turbo if you want.
-Ryan
#7
Yesterday i have installed an oil cooler kit with oil filter relocation which i bougth from mx5parts in the UK.
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
The kit looks very solid, but to connect the oil lines to the adapter was a real pain . I did not have a tool in my toolbox which fitted the small space where you have to screw the lines.
I think the best system is where you put an adapterring between the the oil filter, then you can deciced where you want the oil fittings.
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
The kit looks very solid, but to connect the oil lines to the adapter was a real pain . I did not have a tool in my toolbox which fitted the small space where you have to screw the lines.
I think the best system is where you put an adapterring between the the oil filter, then you can deciced where you want the oil fittings.
#8
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
I decided on the FM sandwich adaptor primarily for the reason that I don't want to relocate the filter (with the intake manifold support bracket removed it's quite easy to reach right where it is) and I didn't want to mess with the extra plumbing involved with an external thermostat.
I'm using an Earl's bar and plate cooler, which looks identical to the one in the picture from mx5parts. They're probably using the same one.
I've never quite understood the idea of taking the turbo oil feed from the filter bracket- FM's relocation bracket (which I don't have) has the same feature. What advantage is there to doing this as opposed to using the fitting on the side of the block, which is much closer to the turbo and doesn't involve stringing a high pressure oil line across the engine compartment?
I'm using an Earl's bar and plate cooler, which looks identical to the one in the picture from mx5parts. They're probably using the same one.
I've never quite understood the idea of taking the turbo oil feed from the filter bracket- FM's relocation bracket (which I don't have) has the same feature. What advantage is there to doing this as opposed to using the fitting on the side of the block, which is much closer to the turbo and doesn't involve stringing a high pressure oil line across the engine compartment?
#9
Only the 1.6 engines have the stock feed on the side of the block (left over when it was a 323GTX engine). FM uses a tee at the OP sender, which as I understand is a real pain in the *** to connect. Using the filter relocation kit is easier than the OP sender. If I had a relocation kit I would use it to feed the turbo.
#10
I'm assuming you have a 1.8 jayc72? I thought I heard something about the fitting on the block that was left over from the 323GTX engine not being as good of an oil source as tapping the pan... don't remember why...
-Ryan
P.S. What is the price for this kit in US Dollars?
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
-Ryan
P.S. What is the price for this kit in US Dollars?
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
#12
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Originally Posted by ThePass
I thought I heard something about the fitting on the block that was left over from the 323GTX engine not being as good of an oil source as tapping the pan... don't remember why...
Tapping the pan is an alternative to using the stock return fitting which is on the right (wrong) side of the engine next to the oil filter. The disadvantage to that fitting is that it's on the far side of the engine, and to use it requires stringing a hose across the front of the engine.
We're talking here about the supply fitting, which is on the correct (left) side of the engine, back near the bellhousing. Basically right below and behind where the turbo goes.
Oh, and jayc72, thanks for the info. I didn't realize that Mazda deleted the supply fitting when they went to the 1.8 casting, but sure enough I checked the instructions for the 1.8 FMI, and there's a big ole' brass tee at the oil pressure sender. Looks like a serious PITA.
#13
Originally Posted by ThePass
P.S. What is the price for this kit in US Dollars?
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
#14
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
Oh, and jayc72, thanks for the info. I didn't realize that Mazda deleted the supply fitting when they went to the 1.8 casting, but sure enough I checked the instructions for the 1.8 FMI, and there's a big ole' brass tee at the oil pressure sender. Looks like a serious PITA.
#15
Originally Posted by ThePass
I'm assuming you have a 1.8 jayc72? I thought I heard something about the fitting on the block that was left over from the 323GTX engine not being as good of an oil source as tapping the pan... don't remember why...
-Ryan
P.S. What is the price for this kit in US Dollars?
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
-Ryan
P.S. What is the price for this kit in US Dollars?
http://www.mx5parts.co.uk/product_in...roducts_id/892
#16
Originally Posted by Arkmage
The '94/'95 blocks DID have the oil and water passages near the bell housing just like the 1.6L (for use as the BPT motor). They deleted it in '96 since.