Prefabbed Turbo Kits A place to discuss prefabricated turbo kits on the market
View Poll Results: Would you get the BEGi S3 or FM2 system
BEGi S3
29
31.52%
FM2
63
68.48%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

BEGi S3 vs FM2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2012 | 11:49 PM
  #61  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi

I'm not even discussing its energy output with you, so I'm not denying or agreeing with that statement because frankly it has nothing to do with this.
Energy output of fuel has nothing to do with power output of engine..

Dann
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-26-2012 | 12:00 AM
  #62  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by nitrodann
I do challenge you and will build it in the coming month or 2.

It doesnt matter what the turbo will make on one fuel if another fuel has a higher energy output. Flow maps are in airflow, not horsepower, and without knowing the efficiency of the cumbustion chamber (lol, rubbish) and the specific energy output of the fuel theres no way to convert flow to power which is what you are trying to do.

Dann
I'm going to quote this and dig it up in 2 months

Originally Posted by nitrodann
Energy output of fuel has nothing to do with power output of engine..

Dann
and this for posterity
Old 10-26-2012 | 12:30 AM
  #63  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

Deal

Dann
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-26-2012 | 02:30 PM
  #64  
gtred's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 301
Total Cats: 4
From: Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
question for you: do you have a log starting at 2k rpm in 4th or 5th gear showing your boost curve?
I have this same turbo and have seen so many different dyno plots that I don't even know when it spools anymore. I've seen full boost anywhere from 3300 to 3800 on this thing. And in FM's case it was something silly like 4200 (but they're at high elevation so maybe that's why).



250whp on a basic log setup on a 2560
So basically FM 250whp = REAL WORLD 200whp

There is no way in hell you're getting 300whp out of an FM2 2560 setup unless you push it to the very limit, like 18-20psi.
Here are the datasheets of my conservative turned S3 potato on a Superflow dyno:




Had trouble with spark bleed on the tach lead, so no rpm info, but it is a typical 6speed trans; 80mph is approx 4k rpms).

Last edited by gtred; 10-26-2012 at 02:40 PM.
Old 10-30-2012 | 09:01 PM
  #65  
NateA99's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: -19
From: powell ohio
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
You are getting rods and pistons also, right? Because why would you even think about rebuilding with the rubber OEM rods.
I asked myself that same question, but im not going to have the money to do the turbo with new crank, rods, and pistons all at once. i wanted to just do the rebuild kit to play it safe until i do have the money (probably a year)
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-30-2012 | 09:09 PM
  #66  
NateA99's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: -19
From: powell ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
question for you: do you have a log starting at 2k rpm in 4th or 5th gear showing your boost curve?
I have this same turbo and have seen so many different dyno plots that I don't even know when it spools anymore. I've seen full boost anywhere from 3300 to 3800 on this thing. And in FM's case it was something silly like 4200 (but they're at high elevation so maybe that's why).



250whp on a basic log setup on a 2560
So basically FM 250whp = REAL WORLD 200whp

There is no way in hell you're getting 300whp out of an FM2 2560 setup unless you push it to the very limit, like 18-20psi.

ok i see what your saying and it makes sense. but im not looking for 300 at the wheels. i clearly understand that would kill the engine really fast, as FM told me the same thing. im looking for something in the area of 260whp.(doesnt have to be exactly 260) So is this still not a feasible number? What if i tuned to the setup the kit comes with then put on a tubular manifold and bumped up to the 2860 size down the road? or are these numbers just not going to happen on stock internals?
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-30-2012 | 10:31 PM
  #67  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Originally Posted by NateA99
I asked myself that same question, but im not going to have the money to do the turbo with new crank, rods, and pistons all at once. i wanted to just do the rebuild kit to play it safe until i do have the money (probably a year)
Old 10-30-2012 | 11:12 PM
  #68  
NateA99's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: -19
From: powell ohio
Default

Well if this is a dumb idea, then why? im learning. im 18 and dont have a lot of experience with turbo'd engines yet. I just want to able to safely boost my stock engine and get decent power from it with out screwing it up. As i previously said in my last post, 300 flywheel hp would be my goal. if thats not a safe goal well looks like im just gonna have to wait or come up with a different plan.
Reply
Leave a poscat -3 Leave a negcat
Old 10-31-2012 | 12:02 AM
  #69  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Attached Images
File Type: gif
VL1TD.gif (965.0 KB, 270 views)
Old 10-31-2012 | 12:13 AM
  #70  
wannafbody's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 977
Total Cats: -369
Default

At the age of 18 I'd suggest sticking with stock HP, you stand a much better chance of seeing 19
Old 10-31-2012 | 08:40 AM
  #71  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by NateA99
Well if this is a dumb idea, then why? im learning. im 18 and dont have a lot of experience with turbo'd engines yet. I just want to able to safely boost my stock engine and get decent power from it with out screwing it up. As i previously said in my last post, 300 flywheel hp would be my goal. if thats not a safe goal well looks like im just gonna have to wait or come up with a different plan.
You go from 300whp, to 260whp, to now 300chp. That's a huge swing, and already says you dunno wtf you're wanting. Then you say you're 18, and have little to no experience turbocharging n/a engines, and that confirms that you know next to nothing about this. Then you ask questions that are not only in the stickies, but can all be answered with a basic search or just by reading a few of the hundreds of threads we have here on power goals, etc.

See where I'm going with this?

I'll be nice to you since you seem to genuinely be looking for information:
read the faq's.
read through the build threads
pick either of the kits discussed here or put together one of your own using proven/commonly used parts on here

if 300 to the crank is all you need, that's about 225whp or so. That is realistic.

good luck
Old 10-31-2012 | 08:47 AM
  #72  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

I asked stupid questions when I joined too. But then I read every thread in the first 10 pages of the "build thread" section (after that the pictures usually stop working so they are not as useful). Now I am a trubo expert.

Also, learn how to drive with stock power before you turbo.

And no, if you are 18, you don't know how to drive.
Old 10-31-2012 | 09:14 AM
  #73  
Ryan_G's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
if 300 to the crank is all you need, that's about 225whp or so. That is realistic.

good luck
Not sure where you got that number because there is only a 30 hp drivetrain loss in a miata and if you want to use the optimistic 15% loss people like to throw out there then you are still only looking at 45hp not 75.
Old 10-31-2012 | 09:18 AM
  #74  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I usually factor in a 25% loss because I'm not a bench racer and would rather be pleasantly surprised at the dyno then sorely disappointed.

Talking about crank power is stupid anyway, so I guess we shouldn't even confuse OP and teach him the right way to look at power figures from the get go.

aim for 225whp. go from there.
Old 10-31-2012 | 09:18 AM
  #75  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79,775
Total Cats: 4,136
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

The drivetrain loss is closer to 25whp not percent
Old 10-31-2012 | 09:21 AM
  #76  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

no. its 26whp
Old 10-31-2012 | 09:53 AM
  #77  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79,775
Total Cats: 4,136
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

26whp is closer to 25whp than 25% hp.

Plus the idea that you lose more power to drivetrain losses as the power output increases doesnt quite make any sense.

you really think that your differential cares if you're outputting 200 vs 400 HP through it?

You think it cares so much that's there's a 100hp loss when there's more power trying to spin it? But only a 50hp loss when there's not quite so much power turning it?

Honestly, that doesnt make sense. Loss is loss, it's not a percentage of the power output.

You're suggesting that Soviet's motor makes 535BHP and it only can't produce that much to the wheels because his drivetrain is overwhelmed. His car must be hella hot when he drives it; the transmission and differential is probably glowing red from outputting 135HP as heat energy.

Last edited by Braineack; 10-31-2012 at 10:24 AM.
Old 10-31-2012 | 10:09 AM
  #78  
albumleaf's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,151
Total Cats: 92
Default

In before nitrodann switches over to carbs.
Old 10-31-2012 | 10:13 AM
  #79  
NateA99's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: -19
From: powell ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
You go from 300whp, to 260whp, to now 300chp. That's a huge swing, and already says you dunno wtf you're wanting. Then you say you're 18, and have little to no experience turbocharging n/a engines, and that confirms that you know next to nothing about this. Then you ask questions that are not only in the stickies, but can all be answered with a basic search or just by reading a few of the hundreds of threads we have here on power goals, etc.

See where I'm going with this?

I'll be nice to you since you seem to genuinely be looking for information:
read the faq's.
read through the build threads
pick either of the kits discussed here or put together one of your own using proven/commonly used parts on here

if 300 to the crank is all you need, that's about 225whp or so. That is realistic.

good luck
Ok well sorry for the "dumb" questions/confusion. And ill be sure to read up on the build threads to narrow down what exactly i need. thanks for the tips
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 10-31-2012 | 10:48 AM
  #80  
NateA99's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 16
Total Cats: -19
From: powell ohio
Default

Originally Posted by wannafbody
At the age of 18 I'd suggest sticking with stock HP, you stand a much better chance of seeing 19
if i dont live till then it will be because of my buddies 500+ hp mustang.. Not my 140 hp miata
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat


Quick Reply: BEGi S3 vs FM2



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.