Quick question on VE table resolution
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 423
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Running NA (no boost) with my cleaned NB2 injectors that allegedly run at 282 at 43.5psi thus running at ~330 at 60psi. I used the REQ calculator and pegged it at 300 so to make the change not too drastic. Therefor, REQ = 10.1.
The highest value on my table is ~100 at 100kPa and 6500rpm. I've heard that you could get more resolution by fiddling with the REQ values. I just wanted to make sure I had this right...
Target max value as 250. 250/100 = 2.5.
10.1/2.5 = 4.04.
Change REQ to 4.04, and multiply entire VE table by 2.5? "Profit" from higher resolution for finer tuning? I'm not "there" yet with my tune at its current state, but wanted to make sure I had this idea correct.
Cheers!
The highest value on my table is ~100 at 100kPa and 6500rpm. I've heard that you could get more resolution by fiddling with the REQ values. I just wanted to make sure I had this right...
Target max value as 250. 250/100 = 2.5.
10.1/2.5 = 4.04.
Change REQ to 4.04, and multiply entire VE table by 2.5? "Profit" from higher resolution for finer tuning? I'm not "there" yet with my tune at its current state, but wanted to make sure I had this idea correct.
Cheers!
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern California
Posts: 423
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Car's an NB1 with nothing changed (aside from NB2 injectors) so allegedly 60psi.
And as far as the score...yeah it's from my younger years. Buyer got mad since I backed out after saying "deal" - since I sold locally and refunded him his money. Haven't bought or sold since
And as far as the score...yeah it's from my younger years. Buyer got mad since I backed out after saying "deal" - since I sold locally and refunded him his money. Haven't bought or sold since
![big grin](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#6
Retired Mech Design Engr
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,011
Total Cats: 859
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Resolution was a thing with MS1, which, I understand had only whole numbers. like "127". Newer MS have decimal... like "127.3", which has already increased resolution by 10 fold. If you have MS2 or 3, or perhaps the High - Res upgrade to MS1, there is not value in increasing the resolution by 2.5.
#10
Retired Mech Design Engr
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Seneca, SC
Posts: 5,011
Total Cats: 859
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks like I spoke out of ignorance. Perhaps only MS3 has 4 places (3 + decimal).
In that case, yes. Divide ReqFuel by 2.5 and multiply table by 2.5. Fueling equation comes out the same.
My apologies.
EDIT: Yes, I looked up the MS2 Manual.
In that case, yes. Divide ReqFuel by 2.5 and multiply table by 2.5. Fueling equation comes out the same.
My apologies.
EDIT: Yes, I looked up the MS2 Manual.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Padlock
ECUs and Tuning
8
01-03-2015 02:57 PM
cardriverx
MEGAsquirt
9
05-13-2008 01:57 PM