Pulling hair out over accel enrichment...
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![vash](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/vash.gif)
#2
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What parameters do you have for TPS based fuelling on MS?
I had the same issue before, and when i had my car tuned the tuner got rid of 99% of it...
I can post my aem throttle maps tonight if the parameters would be the same.
What TPS are you using?
I had the same issue before, and when i had my car tuned the tuner got rid of 99% of it...
I can post my aem throttle maps tonight if the parameters would be the same.
What TPS are you using?
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Its a 95 so I have the variable TPS. Timer is set to seconds, decay enrichment. value at end of accel 0.2. In the Wizard TPS isint tuned in this perticular version of my attempts.
*edit:update*
I can get it tuned right to where it wont stumble above the initial ~5% throttle. however, regardless of RPM crossing from no throttle to anything causes the stumble. If Im allready cruising with say 10% then no matter what I do it WONT stumble. its just that first little bit of throttle that either I'm thinking its not being compensated for or its giving out the wrong signals. Pulse width through that small window is VERY erratic... Im frustrated to say the least.
*edit:update*
I can get it tuned right to where it wont stumble above the initial ~5% throttle. however, regardless of RPM crossing from no throttle to anything causes the stumble. If Im allready cruising with say 10% then no matter what I do it WONT stumble. its just that first little bit of throttle that either I'm thinking its not being compensated for or its giving out the wrong signals. Pulse width through that small window is VERY erratic... Im frustrated to say the least.
Last edited by halfdemonpyro; 05-10-2010 at 01:56 PM.
#4
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Too early in the AM for me to be thinking clearly, but what you describe sounds similar to the problem I ran into when my Over Run settings were off. (More Settings/Over Run Fuel Cut) Turn yours off, if it fixes the problem, turn it back on & work the settings.
I'll be going back to bed now.
I'll be going back to bed now.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sadly still having problems. Overrun is off, TPSdot, 0.195 threshold. starting at 0.0 v/sec 0.3 PWms, next 1.0v/s 7.5pw, 3.9v/s 11.4 pw, 15.1 v/s 14.0 pw, accel time is 0.3. Accel timer is in seconds, non-decay, and Im not boosting so the turning off of enrichments isint touched. Still stumbles going from no throttle to something, worse when going from no throttle to full quickly as in a shift when running hard or throttle blip in a heel-toe downshift.
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 1,482
Total Cats: 0
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow, I'm surprised with settings that low that it doesn't remedy the problem. Have you tried more than .3 ms? You could also try slightly richening the first row of ve cells above and to the right of your idle cells and see if that helps. Post up a log and your msq.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, I just solved it... Its gone completly. Upgraded to 11d hires firmware. Only I have a different problem now... Going to search elsewhere or post in proper thread if I find something.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dead thread revival! Well I had the issue fixed for a while, but it seems it wont stay put. Without touching ANYTHING the most life i get out of a tune seems to be about a week and a half, then the tune seems to wander... I dont know whats going on here but it seems like MS is either compensating or not compensating for something. Seems weather related but more general than day/night... The accel will be fine for a while then they go to **** again and I have to re-tune.
#13
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i get that too - ECU just seems to be really unstable.
sometimes it will behave perfectly, idle's rock steady and no hint of lean spike on accel tip-in.
other times, MAP and RPM oscillate at idle even with a steady idle DC, and car hesitates slightly on accel tip-in due to initial lean spike. again, normally takes about 4-5 days to start going randomly bad after i've got it running nicely, without touching anything, not even plugging the laptop for datalogging.
and i have no idea why - ambient conditions are the same. i can even turn the car off and back on 10 seconds later and it behaves different. sometimes makes me want to go back to stock (tho when it's working it's goooood!!)
sometimes it will behave perfectly, idle's rock steady and no hint of lean spike on accel tip-in.
other times, MAP and RPM oscillate at idle even with a steady idle DC, and car hesitates slightly on accel tip-in due to initial lean spike. again, normally takes about 4-5 days to start going randomly bad after i've got it running nicely, without touching anything, not even plugging the laptop for datalogging.
and i have no idea why - ambient conditions are the same. i can even turn the car off and back on 10 seconds later and it behaves different. sometimes makes me want to go back to stock (tho when it's working it's goooood!!)
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What should I be looking for exactly? Im not sure that baro compensation is functioning properly but Im not sure where it is exactly I need to look to check that it is. I will run some logs today and see if I can somehow translate what gets chisled into my old stone notebook to modern day computers. Its like trying to translate hiroglyphs to english without the rosetta stone...
#18
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
However, before I only had one cell for my idle area and now i've got 4 cells on the VE table and spark map (MS1 so i can't dedicate too mmuch resolution to that area) so am gonna have a play and hopefully i can start to get it a bit more stable - i don't think the AFR changing with the MAP/RPM was a massive problem (bouncing went from 14.5 - 15.5) but the spark timing bouncing a few degrees probably wasn't good.
just really frustrating that the problem comes and disappears seemingly randomly
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 66
Total Cats: 7
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
lowest was 82
engine off Ambient pressure check.
Allright well, bit of a delay in running megasquirt and getting logs. Namely a random deer, and a curb, and a bent lower control arm.
![facepalm](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/facepalm.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM
stoves
Suspension, Brakes, Drivetrain
5
04-21-2016 03:00 PM