Water/Meth injection and small turbo
#1
Water/Meth injection and small turbo
Hello hello,
I'm about to turbo my NA and I'm hesitation between a GT2554R and a GT2560R. I really want quick spool as the car is my daily but I would also like to hit 250WHP (which I think is a reasonable limit to keep a reliable car,no?). So my plan was to us the smaller T25 GT2554R up to 10 psi and add the water meth injection above that boost in order to cool the very hot compressed air of the turbo running at low efficiency.
Has anyone done that? What do you think?
I know that injection adds failure point but I think its kind of cool to be able to have a big red switch for high power
Cheers
Seb
I'm about to turbo my NA and I'm hesitation between a GT2554R and a GT2560R. I really want quick spool as the car is my daily but I would also like to hit 250WHP (which I think is a reasonable limit to keep a reliable car,no?). So my plan was to us the smaller T25 GT2554R up to 10 psi and add the water meth injection above that boost in order to cool the very hot compressed air of the turbo running at low efficiency.
Has anyone done that? What do you think?
I know that injection adds failure point but I think its kind of cool to be able to have a big red switch for high power
Cheers
Seb
#2
caveat: non-miata experience.
I've only ever run water/meth on my subie. When you compare the meth dyno curve to the non-meth dyno curve, the whole curve is moved up about 15whp/wtq. Like you propose, I did this pushing the limit on the stock relatively small turbo. I gained a bunch of area under the curve, but the high end still feels breathless. While it's punchy down low, it tends to encourage me to shift before redline and makes the power band feel narrow. If I could do it again, I'd go bigger turbo.
I've only ever run water/meth on my subie. When you compare the meth dyno curve to the non-meth dyno curve, the whole curve is moved up about 15whp/wtq. Like you propose, I did this pushing the limit on the stock relatively small turbo. I gained a bunch of area under the curve, but the high end still feels breathless. While it's punchy down low, it tends to encourage me to shift before redline and makes the power band feel narrow. If I could do it again, I'd go bigger turbo.
#3
caveat: non-miata experience.
I've only ever run water/meth on my subie. When you compare the meth dyno curve to the non-meth dyno curve, the whole curve is moved up about 15whp/wtq. Like you propose, I did this pushing the limit on the stock relatively small turbo. I gained a bunch of area under the curve, but the high end still feels breathless. While it's punchy down low, it tends to encourage me to shift before redline and makes the power band feel narrow. If I could do it again, I'd go bigger turbo.
I've only ever run water/meth on my subie. When you compare the meth dyno curve to the non-meth dyno curve, the whole curve is moved up about 15whp/wtq. Like you propose, I did this pushing the limit on the stock relatively small turbo. I gained a bunch of area under the curve, but the high end still feels breathless. While it's punchy down low, it tends to encourage me to shift before redline and makes the power band feel narrow. If I could do it again, I'd go bigger turbo.
#8
Water isn't going to magically produce more air. If you aren't making the most of the air you can move (detonation limited), then water/meth will help, but if your compressor can't move more air, lower intake temps won't help make more power.
#9
Well technically the 2554 can produce more air at high boost, just with a crappy 50ish% efficiency. From what I understand everyone runs the GT2554R at 10-12psi. I would like to push it to 16-18psi.
I shouldn't be detonation limited because I'm still at power level below what the car can do with bigger turbos. Assuming the IAT stays low thanks to injection+intercooler.
I'm not sure I get the point of water/meth for anything that isn't det limited.
I will get a 3" exhaust, Ryan you think both turbos will spool the same way?
Sav, you would rather pick the 2560 if you had to do it again?
I shouldn't be detonation limited because I'm still at power level below what the car can do with bigger turbos. Assuming the IAT stays low thanks to injection+intercooler.
I'm not sure I get the point of water/meth for anything that isn't det limited.
I will get a 3" exhaust, Ryan you think both turbos will spool the same way?
Sav, you would rather pick the 2560 if you had to do it again?
#17
Well there was no way for me to see your plot wackbards without asking. And Sixshooter misunderstood my question and insulted me, admin or Jesus himself that's no excuse. I get it, we're on the internet and all, still doesn't hurt to be polite. Admin should show the standard, not lower it.
Anyways from what I see it seems like injection isn't the right idea for a small turbo.
FYI for future reference Sav plot is post #37 here:
https://www.miataturbo.net/dynos-tim...i-49948/page2/
Sav, correct me if I'm wrong but that is not water injected,is it?
Anyways from what I see it seems like injection isn't the right idea for a small turbo.
FYI for future reference Sav plot is post #37 here:
https://www.miataturbo.net/dynos-tim...i-49948/page2/
Sav, correct me if I'm wrong but that is not water injected,is it?