vvt in na chassis sanity check with MS3x
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As the title sort of states. I am doing a 1.8 swap into my 93 chassis. I just wanted to put my thoughts out here and see what everyone thinks. This car is my DD and I cant afford to have it down for a terribly long period of time.
That being said, my current plan is to use the entire vvt engine that I have. Throttle body, through header is included. I already have a 94-97 internally regulated alternator, so I plan to use that instead of the unregulated version.
Because of the ms3x I plan to use the nb cam and crank signals instead of the na cas that I currently have. In order to do this, my understanding is that I can simply splice the wires as needed to power both units (I do have an entire engine harness for the 01 engine, so I will not have any issues running wires as needed.) By doing this I would simply run the cam signal into the 3x board, and the crank signal into the main board. Shiuend and I were talking and he mentioned something about needing certain mods in order to read the odd triggers on the crank wheel and such.
Which is where my first question resides. My MS was originally a
MS1 unit built approximately September 2009, that I converted to ms3x with
assistance around 2 years ago. Can anyone clarify if I need to open my MS3x box, or should everything plug in, wire in, etc etc, and be good to go?
Secondly, I intend to do two things with this swap, 1 is budget. I will be retaining the vtcs (sp??) for the time being. And I plan to keep as much as I can of the 93 wiring. This brings me to a few more questions. Is there anything that needs to be done to the vtcs, should I wire them into something to hold them open, or some other method to retain a somewhat factory operation? Or should I just disconnect that and leave it be?
Lars keeps yelling at me to pull the head off, put a 94-97 headgasket on and run a reroute (this car does get tracked) Keeping with the budget goal here, Is that entirely necessary? I know that the 01 engines have the modified headgasket to compensate for the lack of flow in the back of the head. I have the capability to do a reroute, I just dont want to have to do it if it is not entirely necessary, especially considering that this engine is staying NA.
Regarding the rest, I plan to run wires for the two extra injector wires, the knock sensor incase I get a wild hair and decide to run knock sensing, run a wire to drive the tach, and wire everything else up the way it currently is wired into the ecu.
Sanity check, Am I missing anything? am I doing something entirely the wrong, hard way?
That being said, my current plan is to use the entire vvt engine that I have. Throttle body, through header is included. I already have a 94-97 internally regulated alternator, so I plan to use that instead of the unregulated version.
Because of the ms3x I plan to use the nb cam and crank signals instead of the na cas that I currently have. In order to do this, my understanding is that I can simply splice the wires as needed to power both units (I do have an entire engine harness for the 01 engine, so I will not have any issues running wires as needed.) By doing this I would simply run the cam signal into the 3x board, and the crank signal into the main board. Shiuend and I were talking and he mentioned something about needing certain mods in order to read the odd triggers on the crank wheel and such.
Which is where my first question resides. My MS was originally a
![The Brain](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/the_brain.gif)
![The Brain](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/the_brain.gif)
Secondly, I intend to do two things with this swap, 1 is budget. I will be retaining the vtcs (sp??) for the time being. And I plan to keep as much as I can of the 93 wiring. This brings me to a few more questions. Is there anything that needs to be done to the vtcs, should I wire them into something to hold them open, or some other method to retain a somewhat factory operation? Or should I just disconnect that and leave it be?
Lars keeps yelling at me to pull the head off, put a 94-97 headgasket on and run a reroute (this car does get tracked) Keeping with the budget goal here, Is that entirely necessary? I know that the 01 engines have the modified headgasket to compensate for the lack of flow in the back of the head. I have the capability to do a reroute, I just dont want to have to do it if it is not entirely necessary, especially considering that this engine is staying NA.
Regarding the rest, I plan to run wires for the two extra injector wires, the knock sensor incase I get a wild hair and decide to run knock sensing, run a wire to drive the tach, and wire everything else up the way it currently is wired into the ecu.
Sanity check, Am I missing anything? am I doing something entirely the wrong, hard way?
![Hustler](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/hustler.gif)
#2
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I swapped a 00 engine in a 91 just 2 weeks ago. I found it easier to remove the entire 1.6 engine harness and use the 1.8 engine harness. The 01 connector is different than the 93 though, so you'll have to do some rewiring.
I used the VR inputs with pullup for both crank (main-24) and cam (ms3x-32).
Don't bother transfering the 3 sensors on the 93 (green temp sensor for the ecu, little temp sensor for the dash and gray thermosensor for the fan).
Let MS control the fan and use the gray temp sensor on the 1.8 engine. It has 2 signals, one for ecu and one for the dash. The one for the dash is violet/white iirc.
The easiest way to get your fuel pump running is to just run a wire from the MS fuel pump output to the black/yellow fuel pump relay under the steering column. Just splice into the light green wire.
For the air temp sensor, you connect it to pin B (Black) and pin G (Red/Green) of the AFM connector (polarity doesn’t matter).
Tacho output of the MS can be connected to the yellow/blue wire going to the 1.6 igniter (which you no longer need).
01 is returnless, so you need to replace the dampener on the fuel rail with a fuel pressure regulator from an NA.
No need to run extra wires for the injectors if you're using the 1.8 harness. They're already in there
I used the VR inputs with pullup for both crank (main-24) and cam (ms3x-32).
Don't bother transfering the 3 sensors on the 93 (green temp sensor for the ecu, little temp sensor for the dash and gray thermosensor for the fan).
Let MS control the fan and use the gray temp sensor on the 1.8 engine. It has 2 signals, one for ecu and one for the dash. The one for the dash is violet/white iirc.
The easiest way to get your fuel pump running is to just run a wire from the MS fuel pump output to the black/yellow fuel pump relay under the steering column. Just splice into the light green wire.
For the air temp sensor, you connect it to pin B (Black) and pin G (Red/Green) of the AFM connector (polarity doesn’t matter).
Tacho output of the MS can be connected to the yellow/blue wire going to the 1.6 igniter (which you no longer need).
01 is returnless, so you need to replace the dampener on the fuel rail with a fuel pressure regulator from an NA.
No need to run extra wires for the injectors if you're using the 1.8 harness. They're already in there
![](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I swapped a 00 engine in a 91 just 2 weeks ago. I found it easier to remove the entire 1.6 engine harness and use the 1.8 engine harness. The 01 connector is different than the 93 though, so you'll have to do some rewiring.
To clarify, I have just the engine part of the 01 harness. basically every connector attached to the engine with very long pigtails, not the entire car harness. Apologies for the lack of communication.
I used the VR inputs with pullup for both crank (main-24) and cam (ms3x-32).
This is the part that is completely foreign to me, but Im going to try and follow it.
Don't bother transfering the 3 sensors on the 93 (green temp sensor for the ecu, little temp sensor for the dash and gray thermosensor for the fan).
Let MS control the fan and use the gray temp sensor on the 1.8 engine. It has 2 signals, one for ecu and one for the dash. The one for the dash is violet/white iirc.
Awesome! My fans are already controlled by ms, I was thinking of using the 3 pin temp sensor instead but I wasnt sure on the resistance values driving the oem temp gauge. Ill be doing that then.
The easiest way to get your fuel pump running is to just run a wire from the MS fuel pump output to the black/yellow fuel pump relay under the steering column. Just splice into the light green wire.
Already done.
For the air temp sensor, you connect it to pin B (Black) and pin G (Red/Green) of the AFM connector (polarity doesn’t matter).
Tacho output of the MS can be connected to the yellow/blue wire going to the 1.6 igniter (which you no longer need).
This was essentially the plan, I was just thinking of finding that wire a little closer to the dash, but upon second thought taking it from the igniter itself sounds much easier.
01 is returnless, so you need to replace the dampener on the fuel rail with a fuel pressure regulator from an NA.
This sounds easy enough, Is it a bolt on deal, or will there need to be some massaging with files?
No need to run extra wires for the injectors if you're using the 1.8 harness. They're already in there![](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/smile.gif)
To clarify, I have just the engine part of the 01 harness. basically every connector attached to the engine with very long pigtails, not the entire car harness. Apologies for the lack of communication.
I used the VR inputs with pullup for both crank (main-24) and cam (ms3x-32).
This is the part that is completely foreign to me, but Im going to try and follow it.
Don't bother transfering the 3 sensors on the 93 (green temp sensor for the ecu, little temp sensor for the dash and gray thermosensor for the fan).
Let MS control the fan and use the gray temp sensor on the 1.8 engine. It has 2 signals, one for ecu and one for the dash. The one for the dash is violet/white iirc.
Awesome! My fans are already controlled by ms, I was thinking of using the 3 pin temp sensor instead but I wasnt sure on the resistance values driving the oem temp gauge. Ill be doing that then.
The easiest way to get your fuel pump running is to just run a wire from the MS fuel pump output to the black/yellow fuel pump relay under the steering column. Just splice into the light green wire.
Already done.
For the air temp sensor, you connect it to pin B (Black) and pin G (Red/Green) of the AFM connector (polarity doesn’t matter).
Tacho output of the MS can be connected to the yellow/blue wire going to the 1.6 igniter (which you no longer need).
This was essentially the plan, I was just thinking of finding that wire a little closer to the dash, but upon second thought taking it from the igniter itself sounds much easier.
01 is returnless, so you need to replace the dampener on the fuel rail with a fuel pressure regulator from an NA.
This sounds easy enough, Is it a bolt on deal, or will there need to be some massaging with files?
No need to run extra wires for the injectors if you're using the 1.8 harness. They're already in there
![](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The only thing I dont follow right now is the "VR inputs with pullup for crank (main-24) and cam ms3x-32" I understand that you are saying cam should be on pin 32 ms3x and crank should be on pin 24, but im not sure what the pullup signal is, and If I already have it currently.
#4
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The fuel rail is an issue - the damper is in the wrong place on the 01 rail, you need a 99 rail with the damper on the front, otherwise things will interfere. You'll still need to grind off a bit of the intake manifold where it hits the 99 rail, but that's easy to see.
I ran into an issue where my 94 throttle cable was too long for the NB motor. I either need to make a new bracket to hold it further from the throttle body, or get an NB cable. Not sure if you'll run into this with your 93, but you may have issues here.
Other than that, I'm afraid I'm not much help.
I ran into an issue where my 94 throttle cable was too long for the NB motor. I either need to make a new bracket to hold it further from the throttle body, or get an NB cable. Not sure if you'll run into this with your 93, but you may have issues here.
Other than that, I'm afraid I'm not much help.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know the throttle cable will be an issue, but that is a 5 minute fix. So just to be sure, I do in fact need a 99 fuel rail.
Dumb question, but why do I need to make the system return? I know there is a reason, I cant recall why.
Dumb question, but why do I need to make the system return? I know there is a reason, I cant recall why.
#6
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think this is an excellent opportunity to build a completely new harness. It would totally be worth the money to spring for the 12' MS3x and MS3 harnesses. And yes, I'm fully aware of your budget. But getting GOOD QUALITY automotive wire that is prelabled will never bee any cheaper and terminate in the right connector anyway.
Here's a link to a fairly recent verison of my harness. It has both the miata side and the ms3 side. You may want to wire it differently but whatever works.
https://docs.google.com/a/y8s.com/sp...0E&output=html
Here's a link to a fairly recent verison of my harness. It has both the miata side and the ms3 side. You may want to wire it differently but whatever works.
https://docs.google.com/a/y8s.com/sp...0E&output=html
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think this is an excellent opportunity to build a completely new harness. It would totally be worth the money to spring for the 12' MS3x and MS3 harnesses. And yes, I'm fully aware of your budget. But getting GOOD QUALITY automotive wire that is prelabled will never bee any cheaper and terminate in the right connector anyway.
Here's a link to a fairly recent verison of my harness. It has both the miata side and the ms3 side. You may want to wire it differently but whatever works.
https://docs.google.com/a/y8s.com/sp...0E&output=html
Here's a link to a fairly recent verison of my harness. It has both the miata side and the ms3 side. You may want to wire it differently but whatever works.
https://docs.google.com/a/y8s.com/sp...0E&output=html
But first things first, I can get my hands on a 99 fuel rail, Do I need to do that? or is there a way to make the 01 rail work?
And is there anything internal to the ms3 that I need to do to properly read the crank and cam signals? (or anything I need to check this weekend?)
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thats exactly why im asking. Electronics are voodoo and witchcraft to me, and I was under the impression that the vvt pin 27 on the 3x board could handle the vvt with no issues or changes.![Hustler](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/hustler.gif)
I do not recall, I will read it tomorrow when I have some free time.
![Hustler](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/hustler.gif)
I do not recall, I will read it tomorrow when I have some free time.
#12
mkturbo.com
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/admin.png)
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,189
Total Cats: 1,685
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The biggest issue I think Gryff has is figuring out if his MS was originally built with the VR circuits, or the older circuits that would only read the NA CAS. Realistically once he has the VR circuits is there any reason to run the CAM sensor to the expander card as opposed to where he is already running it on the main DB37?
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The biggest issue I think Gryff has is figuring out if his MS was originally built with the VR circuits, or the older circuits that would only read the NA CAS. Realistically once he has the VR circuits is there any reason to run the CAM sensor to the expander card as opposed to where he is already running it on the main DB37?
![The Brain](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/the_brain.gif)
#15
Boost Czar
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/admin.png)
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
there's definitely a crank sensor on the front of the 96-97 motor a CAS (or cam sensor) on the cam.
I just dunno if they are the same, but im pretty sure the typical opto input you're probably using now will work for the crank input, so then it's just input the cam into the expander.
I'd have to double check the rising vs falling edge and the opto circuit might have to be reversed in polarity, but it's a simple switcher-roo with a few changed jumper wires on the mainboard.
If I built the MS in 2009, the chances it has the VR circuit on the mainboard are nil.
I just dunno if they are the same, but im pretty sure the typical opto input you're probably using now will work for the crank input, so then it's just input the cam into the expander.
I'd have to double check the rising vs falling edge and the opto circuit might have to be reversed in polarity, but it's a simple switcher-roo with a few changed jumper wires on the mainboard.
If I built the MS in 2009, the chances it has the VR circuit on the mainboard are nil.
#17
Tour de Franzia
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Use the charcoal can wires for the VVT solenoid, expect noise on the TPS so severe that you have to run EAE, get a 1994+ fuel injector harness, drill a hole in the floor for all the new wires.
Just go slowly and be methodical. I've done this twice and I did better the first time than the second for some reason.
Just go slowly and be methodical. I've done this twice and I did better the first time than the second for some reason.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 924
Total Cats: 16
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My charcoal canister has been gone for so long, I honestly am not even sure if I have the wires for it anymore. I can check for them this weekend, but I would rather just run new wires to the ecu tbh.