MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

TIP 120 alternative connection points ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2016 | 06:29 PM
  #1  
blackice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default TIP 120 alternative connection points ?

Hi Guys,

Looking for a bit of help here….

I am looking for alternative connection points for the installation of the TIP 120, which is currently attached to the Q4 location on the MS 2 board.

I have soldered this connection twice now and really do not want to solder it again.

I see that the Emitter leg (E) of the TIP 120 can be attached to the jumper (R 39) but it is hard to see where the other two can be connected.
Any ideas ?

Also, can the Diode for the fly back circuit be installed in the Mega squirt; or does it have to be at the PWM Valve?

Thanks guys!

Last edited by blackice; 02-15-2016 at 08:11 PM.
Old 02-15-2016 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

I assume you're referring to the idle circuit.

The collector leg can be connected to the cathode (striped) side of D8, or directly to the IDL pin of the DB37 (pin 30).

The base leg can be connected to the side of R19 which has 0 ohms continuity to the collector (pin 3) of Q20.

The emitter leg can, as you have observed, be connected to the side of R39 which is connected to the base (pin 2) of Q20. This is tricky to judge with an ohmmeter, since R39 is only 1 ohm, so observe the traces visually.




Originally Posted by blackice
Also, can the Diode for the fly back circuit be installed in the Mega squirt; of does it have to be at the PWM Valve?
You can install it inside the ECU if you wish. This is where the flyback circuits for the injector drivers are located, and they generate a much stronger back-EMF potential.

The advice to install it at the valve is mostly academic. In theory, this will decrease radiated noise slightly, but it's a fairly trivial concern in the overall scheme.
Old 02-15-2016 | 08:10 PM
  #3  
blackice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

Thanks Joe !
I will check that out tonight
Old 02-16-2016 | 11:59 AM
  #4  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79,818
Total Cats: 4,152
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

yuk. sounds like you're building a MS1.


yuk yuk yuk.


why?
Old 02-16-2016 | 12:18 PM
  #5  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

He said in the first post he was building an MS2, and I assume he's using a 3.0 PCB.

Nothing wrong with that. For an NA, there's not much advantage to the MS3.
Old 02-16-2016 | 01:01 PM
  #6  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79,818
Total Cats: 4,152
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

there's a lot wrong with it.

like modifying the board to install a TIP120.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crispyBYM
Meet and Greet
5
02-15-2016 10:47 AM
mxnige
Engine Performance
4
02-05-2016 08:21 PM
Chowcow
Media
0
02-04-2016 03:06 AM
NicDrilling
General Miata Chat
9
01-31-2016 01:06 PM
gdoehl
Engine Performance
7
01-29-2016 01:31 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.