Megatune vs TunerStudio
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 963
Total Cats: -1
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A couple days ago i tried using Tuner Studios. I like the interface much more than Megatune. The best thing i think is the ability easily select several VE cells without clicking a million times on a cell like in Megatune.
What do you guys use most Megatune or TunerStudio?
What do you guys use most Megatune or TunerStudio?
#4
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been using tunerstudio for a while now. The multi-select is nice, as well as the interpolate feature on fuel/timing cells. I might have mentioned this before, but it also has the ability to log cas events, which is nice for us 1.6 guys in diagnosing that sort of thing. Oh, and supposedly it has realtime MLV style autotune coming soon!
#11
Slowest Progress Ever
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The coal ridden hills of Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,028
Total Cats: 304
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not one for drastic change. I installed Tuner Studio, and it looked like a nicer, smoother version of MT. Like remember Super Mario Bros. for Nintendo? That is like Megatune, and Tuner Studio is like the Wii version of Mario Bros. This is change I enjoyed though, in fact, I don't even open MT anymore, TS all the way!
#19
Tour de Franzia
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I like the # more than anything else...but in the last year I've learned that for some reason which defies any comprehensible logic, I apparently have a different approach to tuning and greater success than most. This defies convention because I lack confidence in my ability, but apparently I'm right most of the time.