Injector Duty Cycle
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 183
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I noticed today when looking at a datalog in MLV that my max duty cycle (DutyCycle1) was 107. I'm taking that to be a percent, correct? Upon further inspection it appears I'm typically around 80 toward the top of the rev-range, then on some pulls it will jump to 95+ (often the datapoint before I left off the gas). Is that normal or should I be concerned?
For example:
A 3rd gear pull, last 7 datapoints
Duty Cycle: 81.1, 80.3, 78.8, 81.9, 80.3, 104.1, 7.2
I'm running a MSPNP, 550 RC injectors, and a stock fuel pump. I dyno'd 262, 240 a few weeks ago. I haven't had any problems leaning out or anything, air/fuels have been consistent and reasonable. If the high duty cycle is a problem would a fuel pump be a wise investment? From what I've read a Walbro 190lph seems to be the most popular on an NA.
I can post a datalog tomorrow if you guys want to see it for yourself. I'm a little embarassed of this one, I was working on interstate (high rpm/low load) stuff that I haven't really messed with much and it's not pretty.
For example:
A 3rd gear pull, last 7 datapoints
Duty Cycle: 81.1, 80.3, 78.8, 81.9, 80.3, 104.1, 7.2
I'm running a MSPNP, 550 RC injectors, and a stock fuel pump. I dyno'd 262, 240 a few weeks ago. I haven't had any problems leaning out or anything, air/fuels have been consistent and reasonable. If the high duty cycle is a problem would a fuel pump be a wise investment? From what I've read a Walbro 190lph seems to be the most popular on an NA.
I can post a datalog tomorrow if you guys want to see it for yourself. I'm a little embarassed of this one, I was working on interstate (high rpm/low load) stuff that I haven't really messed with much and it's not pretty.
![Giggle](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/gay.gif)
#3
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,339
Total Cats: 6,793
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yup. The displayed value is derived after-the-fact by dividing the cycle time by the calculated required duration. Based upon the current VE value, the Req_Fuel number, and any relevant multipliers, the MS computes the required duration. If this durations happens to be longer than the actual cycle time, you get duty cycle values > 100%.
If you're seeing this with 550s, I have to ask- WTF kind of power are you making?
If you're seeing this with 550s, I have to ask- WTF kind of power are you making?
#6
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 183
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I replaced my fuel pump with a 190 walbro and retuned the car with the new pump. It was running really rich on the old tune. The highest number in my VE table dropped by 11 points, however I'm still seeing duty cycles around 100%.
I know it's going to vary by car and tune but what kind of power are 550cc injectors typically good for? I was under the impression I had a good bit of headroom at 260ish whp. Is there anything else I could check for that could be causing the problem?
I know it's going to vary by car and tune but what kind of power are 550cc injectors typically good for? I was under the impression I had a good bit of headroom at 260ish whp. Is there anything else I could check for that could be causing the problem?
#7
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,339
Total Cats: 6,793
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Couple basic things come to mind.
Fuel filter?
FPR?
Have you done a pressure test at the inlet to the rail? If the factory FPR is going bad, you'd see that as lower-than-stock pressure even at idle. A filter problem might manifest itself at idle, or it might cause pressure to decrease as load increases.
A set of 550s ought to be good for 280 at the crank.
Fuel filter?
FPR?
Have you done a pressure test at the inlet to the rail? If the factory FPR is going bad, you'd see that as lower-than-stock pressure even at idle. A filter problem might manifest itself at idle, or it might cause pressure to decrease as load increases.
A set of 550s ought to be good for 280 at the crank.
#8
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 183
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Couple basic things come to mind.
Fuel filter?
FPR?
Have you done a pressure test at the inlet to the rail? If the factory FPR is going bad, you'd see that as lower-than-stock pressure even at idle. A filter problem might manifest itself at idle, or it might cause pressure to decrease as load increases.
A set of 550s ought to be good for 280 at the crank.
Fuel filter?
FPR?
Have you done a pressure test at the inlet to the rail? If the factory FPR is going bad, you'd see that as lower-than-stock pressure even at idle. A filter problem might manifest itself at idle, or it might cause pressure to decrease as load increases.
A set of 550s ought to be good for 280 at the crank.
I considered the fuel filter as well. I can't remember changing it since I bought the car (10000 miles ago) so who knows how long it's been on there. I'll give that a try and check the fuel pressure as well. Thanks for the help.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 01:09 PM