How's MS holding up to weather?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lambertville, NJ
Posts: 1,215
Total Cats: 74
How's MS holding up to weather?
I'm seriously considering starting an Eliminator build next summer. Of course the engine will be running off an MS.
Target of the build is: Cheap first, power later.
Now when you run an Exocet, Eliminator or Ghettocet, the driver and subsequently the ECU may be exposed to weather-conditions. Rain comes to mind.
I don't much trust the DB37 connectors used in MS. Any ideas how they hold up to getting wet? Any suggestions for a different type connector? Something waterproof maybe? Making an adapter-board seems pretty easy.
Please don't suggest MS-Pro. The price difference to the MS3 is just too much.
Target of the build is: Cheap first, power later.
Now when you run an Exocet, Eliminator or Ghettocet, the driver and subsequently the ECU may be exposed to weather-conditions. Rain comes to mind.
I don't much trust the DB37 connectors used in MS. Any ideas how they hold up to getting wet? Any suggestions for a different type connector? Something waterproof maybe? Making an adapter-board seems pretty easy.
Please don't suggest MS-Pro. The price difference to the MS3 is just too much.
#2
Build the standard MS with standard connectors, then mount it within a semi-water-tight box. Have the only non-sealed opening be at the bottom, with the wires going up inside.
That way you can use standard connectors, but water intrusion will basically be eliminated.
I'm thinking of a sealed aluminum box, with the only opening at the bottom. Two plates with a small semi-circle cut in them mate together to form the bottom. The wires go through this now full circle opening.
That way you can use standard connectors, but water intrusion will basically be eliminated.
I'm thinking of a sealed aluminum box, with the only opening at the bottom. Two plates with a small semi-circle cut in them mate together to form the bottom. The wires go through this now full circle opening.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lambertville, NJ
Posts: 1,215
Total Cats: 74
MS3 Pro: $1200
MS3/MS3X: $500
The difference is a set of Bilsteins with coilovers. Or a manifold and downpipe (I have the rest needed for a turbo setup for the eliminator)
At $800 or so, I would consider the Pro. The current price-tag is just way out of my league.
MS3/MS3X: $500
The difference is a set of Bilsteins with coilovers. Or a manifold and downpipe (I have the rest needed for a turbo setup for the eliminator)
At $800 or so, I would consider the Pro. The current price-tag is just way out of my league.
#8
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,455
Total Cats: 6,874
One way to weatherproof non-weatherproof connectors is to smear silicone grease all over both sides of the connection before mating them. Silicone spray can be easily shot into the pins of the connector first, followed by grease to fill up the remaining space.
It's messy, but this is how we treat RF connectors which go up on the top of a tower and are thus difficult to access for repair years down the road.
A better solution, obviously, is to mount the ECU in an area where it's not likely to get wet. Like inside a box. If you really want to be awesome, put it into a totally sealed box, and make a short wiring harness to go from a DB-37 to a properly weatherproofed connector, and mount that connector through the side of the box.
It's messy, but this is how we treat RF connectors which go up on the top of a tower and are thus difficult to access for repair years down the road.
A better solution, obviously, is to mount the ECU in an area where it's not likely to get wet. Like inside a box. If you really want to be awesome, put it into a totally sealed box, and make a short wiring harness to go from a DB-37 to a properly weatherproofed connector, and mount that connector through the side of the box.
#10
What Joe said to do is what I would do if I had more time than money and needed my MS3X to be waterproof.
#13
Input filter for other sensors (air, coolant, etc) are all perfectly smooth. I've seen plenty of datalogs from other ECU's where they are jumpy, my MS3 PRO's are perfectly smooth/stable.
See Ben's post here
https://www.miataturbo.net/ecus-tuni...a-2-7-a-86755/
MSPNP Pro uses near identical base hardware as the MS3-Pro. That hardware is miles ahead of traditional MS3X type ECUs and all other MegaSquirt ECUs that use B&G daughter cards in all measurable areas (efficiency, ruggedness, input and output buffering, low/high voltage stability, it's even smaller and lighter). I have numerous customer reports of replacing MS3X with MS3-Pro and picking up power.
#15
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Beaverton, USA
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
Kind of. The crank/cam input circuit really is significantly better. I'm actually going to be building my own version of it soon because of some of the issues that the normal inputs have. It uses a maxim VR chip, which is much better. The MS3/3x works well and is a good deal, but the MS3Pro is another level.
#16
Kind of. The crank/cam input circuit really is significantly better. I'm actually going to be building my own version of it soon because of some of the issues that the normal inputs have. It uses a maxim VR chip, which is much better. The MS3/3x works well and is a good deal, but the MS3Pro is another level.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lambertville, NJ
Posts: 1,215
Total Cats: 74
May I ask why?
I installed my MS3X a few years back and it worked pretty much right out of the gate.
I also installed one in a '64 F100 on a 351 from a 97 F250 without a hitch.
Both cases took a little fiddling with the Crank or Cam sensors, but that was all I'd consider even slightly problematic.
I installed my MS3X a few years back and it worked pretty much right out of the gate.
I also installed one in a '64 F100 on a 351 from a 97 F250 without a hitch.
Both cases took a little fiddling with the Crank or Cam sensors, but that was all I'd consider even slightly problematic.
#18
May I ask why?
I installed my MS3X a few years back and it worked pretty much right out of the gate.
I also installed one in a '64 F100 on a 351 from a 97 F250 without a hitch.
Both cases took a little fiddling with the Crank or Cam sensors, but that was all I'd consider even slightly problematic.
I installed my MS3X a few years back and it worked pretty much right out of the gate.
I also installed one in a '64 F100 on a 351 from a 97 F250 without a hitch.
Both cases took a little fiddling with the Crank or Cam sensors, but that was all I'd consider even slightly problematic.
#20
Basically all the reasons Ben listed. It's a better part, better designed, better connectors, better case, inputs are smooth vs all my experience with MS2/MS3 they were noisy. I've used the cheaper versions and they work, I'm not knocking them. Ran them for years. But I won't buy one again when there's a much better one out.
I haven't noticed a SINGLE one of these "improvements". Not one. Not a single time.
In fact, the biggest problem, with my PRO, was the mind-numbingly STUPID prehistoric serial connection to the computer, that required an extra usb/serial adapter, and kept losing connection a billion times. Not one of my 3x's ever had this problem with their USB cable.
I just received another freshly built Rev unit that I'll be installing and tuning on Thumpetto's 01. I'll gladly post my feedback of that one too, and take my words back if the above stated personal experience is changed within these next couple weeks.