drifting timing with rpm
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brownsburg,IN
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a 99 turbo runing MS3 Basic stock triger and GM coils, i see an increasing timing discrepancy as rpm rise when i look at timing on the engine with a timing light, i could see it on the dyno when i set all the timing numbers to 12 deg on timing table 1 and did a run and i can see it reving the engine after setting timing to 10deg fixed timing (not the timing table) the timing shift is about 14 deg at 6000RPM and aroud 16 at 7000rpm.
I will test a different cranck sensor tomorrow to see if that changes anything.
Any ideas of what can cause this?
I will test a different cranck sensor tomorrow to see if that changes anything.
Any ideas of what can cause this?
#6
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,340
Total Cats: 6,800
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The exact number varies from car to car, but it will always be a positive number (representing electrical delay from crankshaft to ECU) and will generally be in the tens to lower hundreds.
It's a trial-and-error setting.
It's a trial-and-error setting.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brownsburg,IN
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I progresevelly changed and burned with each change the spark latancy from 0 to 255 (the maximum) with fixed timing set to 10 BTDC, the timing still advances with rpm from 10 at idle to arownd 20 BTDC at 6000rpm, there did not seem to be a difference as i changed the latency number, my tuner said that some cars have this issue and is caused by sensor variation, he dos say that this is the only Miata he has seen with this issue.
#9
Elite Member
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,987
Total Cats: 359
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Chiming in, as it's definitely the first time I see it as well.
I would start by updating to the latest stable firmware, which is 1.4.0.
The latency is only used if the timing retards, not if it advances.
Also, this might seem silly, but do try with a different timing light as well.
I would start by updating to the latest stable firmware, which is 1.4.0.
The latency is only used if the timing retards, not if it advances.
Also, this might seem silly, but do try with a different timing light as well.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brownsburg,IN
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks everybody, i will try a diferent timing light, pickup sensor, and the latest firmwere, i am still runing 1.4 alpha 9 that Scott Clark from DYI installed before tuning my car earlier this year.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brownsburg,IN
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We were going to tune with the flex fuel sensor and E85 but desided to wait until i can figure out what is going on with the timing.
#13
Supporting Vendor
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/vendor.png)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The spark latency setting is to help control timing retard induced by the vehicle's electronics. It will not correct self advancing ignition in relation to RPM.
You may be triggering off the wrong edge of the tooth. I have seen cases where an unstable edge will cause timing advance with increased RPM.
You may be triggering off the wrong edge of the tooth. I have seen cases where an unstable edge will cause timing advance with increased RPM.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brownsburg,IN
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ben, i am runing OEM triger wheel and sensor, i see that you reccomend 2mm tall teeth and thicker steel with your sensors.
Do you reccoment i install one of your wheels? I dont see a bolt on wheel on your website but would like to know if you have one that you reccomend.
Thanks
Do you reccoment i install one of your wheels? I dont see a bolt on wheel on your website but would like to know if you have one that you reccomend.
Thanks
#16
Elite Member
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,987
Total Cats: 359
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All my units work with rising edge and going high. Setting to falling edge will cause the edges to overlap and the car won't start. These units use optocouplers, and I've never seen this issue before.
Which firmware are you on right now?
Which firmware are you on right now?
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brownsburg,IN
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The reason for loading it before the tuning was that we wanted to run the flex fuel sensor and E85 blending maps during that session and 1.4 had some new features in this area.
I will load 1.4.0 and see if that changes anything
I will load 1.4.0 and see if that changes anything