MEGAsquirt A place to collectively sort out this megasquirt gizmo

drifting timing with rpm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-14-2015 | 10:09 PM
  #1  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default drifting timing with rpm

I have a 99 turbo runing MS3 Basic stock triger and GM coils, i see an increasing timing discrepancy as rpm rise when i look at timing on the engine with a timing light, i could see it on the dyno when i set all the timing numbers to 12 deg on timing table 1 and did a run and i can see it reving the engine after setting timing to 10deg fixed timing (not the timing table) the timing shift is about 14 deg at 6000RPM and aroud 16 at 7000rpm.
I will test a different cranck sensor tomorrow to see if that changes anything.
Any ideas of what can cause this?
Attached Files
File Type: msl
2015-11-14_19.07.57ft.msl (852.9 KB, 160 views)
Old 11-14-2015 | 10:11 PM
  #2  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

Here is a utube video of what i see with a timing light when reving the engine with fixed timing set at 19 deg

Old 11-15-2015 | 12:22 AM
  #3  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,187
Total Cats: 859
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

What do you have the spark hardware latency set to?

--Ian
Old 11-15-2015 | 09:49 AM
  #4  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

it is set to 0, can i put a negative number there?
Attached Thumbnails drifting timing with rpm-spark-settings.jpg  
Old 11-15-2015 | 04:17 PM
  #5  
curly's Avatar
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,497
Total Cats: 1,236
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

Start with 100, see what happens. That's what rev used for a 32-1 wheel I've used.
Old 11-15-2015 | 05:05 PM
  #6  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

The exact number varies from car to car, but it will always be a positive number (representing electrical delay from crankshaft to ECU) and will generally be in the tens to lower hundreds.

It's a trial-and-error setting.
Old 11-15-2015 | 05:52 PM
  #7  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

Thanks, i will test it tonight
Old 11-15-2015 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

I progresevelly changed and burned with each change the spark latancy from 0 to 255 (the maximum) with fixed timing set to 10 BTDC, the timing still advances with rpm from 10 at idle to arownd 20 BTDC at 6000rpm, there did not seem to be a difference as i changed the latency number, my tuner said that some cars have this issue and is caused by sensor variation, he dos say that this is the only Miata he has seen with this issue.
Old 11-15-2015 | 06:55 PM
  #9  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,991
Total Cats: 362
From: Athens, Greece
Default

Chiming in, as it's definitely the first time I see it as well.

I would start by updating to the latest stable firmware, which is 1.4.0.

The latency is only used if the timing retards, not if it advances.

Also, this might seem silly, but do try with a different timing light as well.
Old 11-15-2015 | 07:02 PM
  #10  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by Reverant
The latency is only used if the timing retards, not if it advances.
Just noticed that myself.

Strange happenings afoot. Prediction?
Old 11-15-2015 | 08:27 PM
  #11  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

Thanks everybody, i will try a diferent timing light, pickup sensor, and the latest firmwere, i am still runing 1.4 alpha 9 that Scott Clark from DYI installed before tuning my car earlier this year.
Old 11-15-2015 | 09:57 PM
  #12  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

Originally Posted by Reverant
Chiming in, as it's definitely the first time I see it as well.
Also, this might seem silly, but do try with a different timing light as well.
Reverant, I think that the engine is getting the timing i see with the timing light, take a look at the timing table we ended up with (only tuned to 15PSI and it makes 300HP at 14 on 93 octane) but it would have ended up in some big negative numbers timing wise if we would have gone to 18 or 20 PSI.
We were going to tune with the flex fuel sensor and E85 but desided to wait until i can figure out what is going on with the timing.
Attached Thumbnails drifting timing with rpm-timing-table.jpg  
Old 11-15-2015 | 10:28 PM
  #13  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

The spark latency setting is to help control timing retard induced by the vehicle's electronics. It will not correct self advancing ignition in relation to RPM.

You may be triggering off the wrong edge of the tooth. I have seen cases where an unstable edge will cause timing advance with increased RPM.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old 11-15-2015 | 10:51 PM
  #14  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

Ben, i am runing OEM triger wheel and sensor, i see that you reccomend 2mm tall teeth and thicker steel with your sensors.
Do you reccoment i install one of your wheels? I dont see a bolt on wheel on your website but would like to know if you have one that you reccomend.
Thanks
Old 11-16-2015 | 05:12 PM
  #15  
Ben's Avatar
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
From: atlanta-ish
Default

Why?

Just try different input capture edges and see if you find a combo that works better than current.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Old 11-16-2015 | 05:32 PM
  #16  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,991
Total Cats: 362
From: Athens, Greece
Default

All my units work with rising edge and going high. Setting to falling edge will cause the edges to overlap and the car won't start. These units use optocouplers, and I've never seen this issue before.

Which firmware are you on right now?
Old 11-16-2015 | 06:20 PM
  #17  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

I am runing 1.4 alpha 9 that Scott installed before tuning the car earlier this year
Old 11-17-2015 | 04:01 AM
  #18  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,991
Total Cats: 362
From: Athens, Greece
Default

Alpha firmware should NEVER be installed if you don't have a reason to try it. Scott should know that. Upgrade to 1.4.0 or downgrade to 1.3.4.
Old 11-17-2015 | 06:08 AM
  #19  
HHammerly's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 837
Total Cats: 63
From: Brownsburg,IN
Default

The reason for loading it before the tuning was that we wanted to run the flex fuel sensor and E85 blending maps during that session and 1.4 had some new features in this area.
I will load 1.4.0 and see if that changes anything
Old 11-21-2015 | 05:58 AM
  #20  
Dlaitini's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 239
Total Cats: 5
From: Cedar City, UT
Default

Originally Posted by Reverant
All my units work with rising edge and going high. Setting to falling edge will cause the edges to overlap and the car won't start. These units use optocouplers, and I've never seen this issue before.

Which firmware are you on right now?
Is this true with your MS2's as well?

Mine is showing falling edge and going high (inverted) and I've had issues cranking forever but once it starts it runs ok. That is what it was on default when I got it.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 AM.