If no one minds me asking, why do we all use LC-1s?
#1
Want fries with that?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 2,011
Total Cats: 2
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is there some super feature or something that I don't know about or something? Seems like the LC1 is the most finicky, unreliable, nitpicky, most annoying wideband out there.
I know people are running like PLXs and AEMs and ****, so why do we all use LC1s? Serious question.
I know people are running like PLXs and AEMs and ****, so why do we all use LC1s? Serious question.
#14
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I use the autometer nexus wideband because it matches the rest of my ****. It stays turned off on extended cranks and when the sensor starts to die is does stupid **** and then hangs at 14.7. It seems fairly accurate and is normally within .3-.5 of the wideband on the hydra. I chalk that up to the sensors being in different locations though.
#15
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,340
Total Cats: 6,793
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I had an AEM originally. Never liked it. The display was both slow and jumpy (a hard thing to achieve) and the analog output seemed to drift in and out of calibration.
Changed it out for an LC-1 about a year and a half ago. Very pleased with it.
Changed it out for an LC-1 about a year and a half ago. Very pleased with it.