Computer geeks assemble!
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm in the market for a laptop capable of handling programs like AutoCAD, Autodesk, Solidworks etc. I have my eye on the Lenovo Thinkpad entry level laptop with and i7 processor which puts me on the $700 level. However, I've also look at the X-convertible laptops and I wonder if it's worth it. Let me know what you guys think
#2
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,340
Total Cats: 6,800
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most important question: what size are you looking for?
Myself, I won't use anything larger than 12.5", and prefer something in the 11" class. They fit very nicely in my lap when I'm on the sofa, can open fully in a coach-class airline seat even with the guy in front of me reclined, and are very easy to carry around. My current unit is a Dell E4200, and I use AutoCAD 2005 on it. It would probably suck ***** with Solidworks due to the weak onboard 3D graphics chipset.
Some folks go the other way and order monster 17" machines. My step-father went this route (also a Dell) and he regrets it. The machine is far too large and heavy to comfortably carry around, and since hes a realtor, that's a big minus.
The rest of the crowd just default into the 14-15" class, which is fine, I suppose, if you don't ever travel by air.
Myself, I won't use anything larger than 12.5", and prefer something in the 11" class. They fit very nicely in my lap when I'm on the sofa, can open fully in a coach-class airline seat even with the guy in front of me reclined, and are very easy to carry around. My current unit is a Dell E4200, and I use AutoCAD 2005 on it. It would probably suck ***** with Solidworks due to the weak onboard 3D graphics chipset.
Some folks go the other way and order monster 17" machines. My step-father went this route (also a Dell) and he regrets it. The machine is far too large and heavy to comfortably carry around, and since hes a realtor, that's a big minus.
The rest of the crowd just default into the 14-15" class, which is fine, I suppose, if you don't ever travel by air.
#4
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most important question: what size are you looking for?
Myself, I won't use anything larger than 12.5", and prefer something in the 11" class. They fit very nicely in my lap when I'm on the sofa, can open fully in a coach-class airline seat even with the guy in front of me reclined, and are very easy to carry around. My current unit is a Dell E4200, and I use AutoCAD 2005 on it. It would probably suck ***** with Solidworks due to the weak onboard 3D graphics chipset.
Some folks go the other way and order monster 17" machines. My step-father went this route (also a Dell) and he regrets it. The machine is far too large and heavy to comfortably carry around, and since hes a realtor, that's a big minus.
The rest of the crowd just default into the 14-15" class, which is fine, I suppose, if you don't ever travel by air.
Myself, I won't use anything larger than 12.5", and prefer something in the 11" class. They fit very nicely in my lap when I'm on the sofa, can open fully in a coach-class airline seat even with the guy in front of me reclined, and are very easy to carry around. My current unit is a Dell E4200, and I use AutoCAD 2005 on it. It would probably suck ***** with Solidworks due to the weak onboard 3D graphics chipset.
Some folks go the other way and order monster 17" machines. My step-father went this route (also a Dell) and he regrets it. The machine is far too large and heavy to comfortably carry around, and since hes a realtor, that's a big minus.
The rest of the crowd just default into the 14-15" class, which is fine, I suppose, if you don't ever travel by air.
If I was a journalist major leaving off my daddy's money I would...
#10
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/bowrofl.gif)
HD3000 won't cut it. Intel HDx000 is integrated into the CPU, and would be very lacking compared to just about any discrete card. Nvidia Quadro is built for CAD. If that is the main purpose (Ie: No gaming, but it would work well for gaming too), it should suit your needs pretty well. Based on Lenovo, Quadro: It looks like the W350 would suit your needs. ThinkPad W530 Mobile Workstation - Review Powerful Laptop Specs | Lenovo | (US)
There are sure other more cost-effective options.
#11
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sounds discrete enough then
![](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/bowrofl.gif)
HD3000 won't cut it. Intel HDx000 is integrated into the CPU, and would be very lacking compared to just about any discrete card. Nvidia Quadro is built for CAD. If that is the main purpose (Ie: No gaming, but it would work well for gaming too), it should suit your needs pretty well. Based on Lenovo, Quadro: It looks like the W350 would suit your needs. ThinkPad W530 Mobile Workstation - Review Powerful Laptop Specs | Lenovo | (US)
There are sure other more cost-effective options.
I don't care about gaming, and I think I misunderstood what "discrete" is.
![](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/bowrofl.gif)
HD3000 won't cut it. Intel HDx000 is integrated into the CPU, and would be very lacking compared to just about any discrete card. Nvidia Quadro is built for CAD. If that is the main purpose (Ie: No gaming, but it would work well for gaming too), it should suit your needs pretty well. Based on Lenovo, Quadro: It looks like the W350 would suit your needs. ThinkPad W530 Mobile Workstation - Review Powerful Laptop Specs | Lenovo | (US)
There are sure other more cost-effective options.
#15
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
there are like 5 laptop workstations that use the Quadro cards. That should narrow down your search pretty quickly.
Also forget screen size as a parameter. If you intend to get serious, you'll get a dock and a separate monitor.
Also forget screen size as a parameter. If you intend to get serious, you'll get a dock and a separate monitor.
#16
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Aside from the Lenovo w530 and a HP ultrabook the others I've come across use the GeForce unit, but like I mentioned above that seems to be a gaming-oriented card. Also I use my tv as monitor it works for me.
#17
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,340
Total Cats: 6,800
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For the purpose of Solidworks, you DO care about gaming. The same graphics accelerators targeted at gamers are also applicable to realtime 3d solid modelling.
If we're ignoring screen size as a parameter and assuming it'll be docked all the time, then why even bother with a laptop? A desktop PC will universally cost less and deliver higher performance. (Remember- for each processor class there are desktop and mobile versions. For the same ratings otherwise, a desktop i5 will always outperform a laptop i5M by a considerable margin.)
#18
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Discrete = there's a physical graphics chip which is separate from the main CPU. It may be located directly on the motherboard, or it may sit on a separate board, like a miniature version of a desktop graphics card.
For the purpose of Solidworks, you DO care about gaming. The same graphics accelerators targeted at gamers are also applicable to realtime 3d solid modelling.
For the purpose of Solidworks, you DO care about gaming. The same graphics accelerators targeted at gamers are also applicable to realtime 3d solid modelling.
Some analyses:
http://web.eurocom.com/ec/ec_GetBenchmarkB(20)
GeForce GTX 580 vs Quadro 5000 | NYC Max User Group
If we're ignoring screen size as a parameter and assuming it'll be docked all the time, then why even bother with a laptop? A desktop PC will universally cost less and deliver higher performance. (Remember- for each processor class there are desktop and mobile versions. For the same ratings otherwise, a desktop i5 will always outperform a laptop i5M by a considerable margin.)
One other thing to consider: don't spend extra money on extra cores. Most CAD platforms use one at a time. It's a software limitation imposed by the way the geometries are calculated. Extra cores will speed up rendering and stuff like that, but the biggest benefit is going to be multitasking and not CAD performance itself.
#19
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Discrete = there's a physical graphics chip which is separate from the main CPU. It may be located directly on the motherboard, or it may sit on a separate board, like a miniature version of a desktop graphics card.
For the purpose of Solidworks, you DO care about gaming. The same graphics accelerators targeted at gamers are also applicable to realtime 3d solid modelling.
For the purpose of Solidworks, you DO care about gaming. The same graphics accelerators targeted at gamers are also applicable to realtime 3d solid modelling.
If we're ignoring screen size as a parameter and assuming it'll be docked all the time, then why even bother with a laptop? A desktop PC will universally cost less and deliver higher performance. (Remember- for each processor class there are desktop and mobile versions. For the same ratings otherwise, a desktop i5 will always outperform a laptop i5M by a considerable margin.)
#20
Boost Pope
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/smod.png)
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,340
Total Cats: 6,800
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not true at all. the Quadro / FirePro cards represent a significant (3-4x) performance improvement over the gaming cards. Gaming cards are optimized for foggy mist and pretty landscapes. CAD cards are optimized for geometry and polygon modeling.
Some analyses:
http://web.eurocom.com/ec/ec_GetBenchmarkB(20)
GeForce GTX 580 vs Quadro 5000 | NYC Max User Group
Some analyses:
http://web.eurocom.com/ec/ec_GetBenchmarkB(20)
GeForce GTX 580 vs Quadro 5000 | NYC Max User Group
![big grin](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)