|
|
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 1049506)
Yo, bro. Roll back that saturation, you're hurting my eyes. ;) Nice shots though. I can never get more than a bird in my wildlife shots. Though I really don't do much wildlife photos.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378125952 https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-1...DSC_2118_3.JPG |
|
2 Attachment(s)
|
2 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1049630)
Backyard deer says: Check my histogram, then stfu.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1378132343 |
2 Attachment(s)
That saturation reminds me of my old Pentax K10, unless shooting RAW, the images came straight out of the camera quite oversaturated.
I think the composition of the deer is improved when made into a square medium format. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1378143364 Long live square http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2376/2...e1a373ce_z.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
|
1 Attachment(s)
I've noticed that over the years of taking pictures, I started off favoring high saturation and contrast, and slowly I've grown to favor the look of natural or lower saturation images, with slightly less contrast. High saturation not only looks unnatural, but it also takes away from detail in the image. It's amazing rolling back the saturation and seeing details revealed that you couldn't see before.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378145583 |
1 Attachment(s)
|
1 Attachment(s)
You are all homos.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378146637 |
6 Attachment(s)
Might as well... Don't destroy my noob pictures. They were all shot with a Canon sx-10.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378154829 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378154829 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378154829 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378154829 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378154829 And a car I detailed. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378154829 |
1 Attachment(s)
|
rofl
|
|
3 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
(Post 1049679)
That saturation reminds me of my old Pentax K10, unless shooting RAW, the images came straight out of the camera quite oversaturated.
If you look at the wood and ground and leaves you can see they are NOT oversaturated. I think the color of the fur of the doe is throwing you off--it was almost orange. The one that was in question had no saturation or vibrance added at all. It was pretty much cropped, sharpened, and uploaded. It was shot at 4pm in direct sunlight and the grass was honestly glowing green like that in the sun, same with this shot: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378215867 DSC_1938-1 by Braineack2000, on Flickr here's one I did oversaturate on purpose: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1378216155 notice the wood pile. I think the real issue was the white balance, where it was way too blue. I warmed it up and desaturated it just a touch: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7406/9...65f1e66b_c.jpg DSC_2230_12_edit by Braineack2000, on Flickr better? |
1 Attachment(s)
|
I work in vibration these days doing primary level accelerometer standard calibrations. I intend to punch a hole in a piece of steel sheet this week and do this:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Posting on work computer yields double posts. Thanks Obama.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378232078 |
2 Attachment(s)
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
1 Attachment(s)
I like it when it takes a second for me to understand license plates.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378233975 |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 AM. |
|
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands