Help with water lines
#4
I guess I'm a few weeks late on this thread, but I was just thinking of starting one very similar. I'm kind of disappointed with the lack of replies, maybe we can get this going.
djp, my current setup is not running water through the throttlebody. Living in a warm climate, I could see no reason to run 200 degree water through my intake. Maybe I missed something, but I see no reason to keep it as long as there is no threat to a frozen throttlebody.
I've seen some cars with the front water neck completely eliminated and I'm very interested in learning more about that setup, I just had a few questions...
I'm assuming that removal of the front water neck means the supply to the oil cooler and turbo are coming from the "hot water" at the back of the motor, correct?
If the cooler and turbo are fed inline (from the same source) which would it be advisable to feed first? Or do they absolutely need to come from separate sources?
Does getting an aftermarket oil cooler eliminate the need to run water to the stock cooler?
djp, my current setup is not running water through the throttlebody. Living in a warm climate, I could see no reason to run 200 degree water through my intake. Maybe I missed something, but I see no reason to keep it as long as there is no threat to a frozen throttlebody.
I've seen some cars with the front water neck completely eliminated and I'm very interested in learning more about that setup, I just had a few questions...
I'm assuming that removal of the front water neck means the supply to the oil cooler and turbo are coming from the "hot water" at the back of the motor, correct?
If the cooler and turbo are fed inline (from the same source) which would it be advisable to feed first? Or do they absolutely need to come from separate sources?
Does getting an aftermarket oil cooler eliminate the need to run water to the stock cooler?
#5
I had the same concerns about the 200 degree water coming throught the throttle body. Seems counterintuitive to have an intercooler, then a heater.
Here are my thoughts: With forced induction I think the heating of the throttle body is less of a concern. The air is flowing though the throttle opening so fast that I bet the heating effect is minimal. I think that NA would be more of a concern.
I could have easily bypassed it by going from the oil cooler to the waterneck location.
Long story short: M car ran great with it fixed, so I saw no reason other than asthetic to romve it. As it turns out; It doesn't look that bad hooked up. I removed the thermostat housing and replaced it with a barb. I used a short length of coolant hose to a tee fitting. With hindsite I would have used a straight brass pipe Instead of rubber hose) to a brass tee.
Here are my thoughts: With forced induction I think the heating of the throttle body is less of a concern. The air is flowing though the throttle opening so fast that I bet the heating effect is minimal. I think that NA would be more of a concern.
I could have easily bypassed it by going from the oil cooler to the waterneck location.
Long story short: M car ran great with it fixed, so I saw no reason other than asthetic to romve it. As it turns out; It doesn't look that bad hooked up. I removed the thermostat housing and replaced it with a barb. I used a short length of coolant hose to a tee fitting. With hindsite I would have used a straight brass pipe Instead of rubber hose) to a brass tee.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StratoBlue1109
Miata parts for sale/trade
21
09-30-2018 02:09 PM
JesseTheNoob
DIY Turbo Discussion
15
09-30-2015 03:44 PM