929 AFM?
#3
Because I'd rather not spend the big bucks for megasquirt on a non turbo car. If the max gains are going to be 5 or 6 hp on a naturally aspirated 1.8 an inexpensive AFM should achieve the same results as MS. And I'm not aware of anyone near me in Pittsburgh that's a MS wiz to help with tuning.
#6
So with all the time and tinkering you already wasted trying to get this FAIL AND AIDZ to work on your car and provide like .0005 hp you could have easily just bought MS and gained more like 10-15hp (or more than 5) and more importantly you'd see gains everywhere which matters a whole log.
You sound like some of the stubborn ignorant n00bs: "I don't know how to tune it so I'll just avoid it".
Good luck
You sound like some of the stubborn ignorant n00bs: "I don't know how to tune it so I'll just avoid it".
Good luck
#8
So with all the time and tinkering you already wasted trying to get this FAIL AND AIDZ to work on your car and provide like .0005 hp you could have easily just bought MS and gained more like 10-15hp (or more than 5) and more importantly you'd see gains everywhere which matters a whole log.
You sound like some of the stubborn ignorant n00bs: "I don't know how to tune it so I'll just avoid it".
Good luck
You sound like some of the stubborn ignorant n00bs: "I don't know how to tune it so I'll just avoid it".
Good luck
#9
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 407
Who says they got the same results from an AFM as converting to speed density with megasquirt? because whoever said that obviously doesnt know anything about tuning, nor did they have the sense to find a competent tuner.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
01-08-2021 11:24 AM