Flyin Miata - Miata Accessories 1-800-FLY-MX5s (orders) 1-970-242-3800 (tech)

header from the targa miata

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2008 | 03:37 AM
  #61  
matttheniceguy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 104
Total Cats: 0
From: Vancouver Canada
Default

There is pretty much no way they could mass produce that header, take a look at its shape, I really don't think there are any CNC mandrel benders that could make those primaries are there?

Maybe there are viable production techniques that could produce those headers at a close to realistic price, but even then the market is way to small to make any money off the production.

If you want one so bad, make your own, Keith gave everyone a very good look at how to do it.
Old 12-28-2008 | 01:57 PM
  #62  
reckless_abandon's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 93
Total Cats: 0
From: chilliwack, bc
Default

Originally Posted by TravisR
...Unfortunately most guys that go N/A wouldn't deal with a car that won't idle below 1500, and the ones that would deal with it run a T-60.
this is true... except for in my case haha. high idle just adds character.
Old 01-02-2009 | 02:04 PM
  #63  
Keith@FM's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 754
Total Cats: 118
Default

Yeesh. So much arguing.

The gains on that header were dynoed against a Racing Beat on the same engine. Blue is the crazy header, red is the RB. This was not the final race tune, but it's a direct comparison.
Dyno chart

Note that the engine was built to be reliable above everything else, thus no ITBs and with safe timing numbers on 91 octane gas. ITBs are great for throttle response (real throttle response) but they're a pain in the butt to deal with when you have a big cam and large altitude changes. This car is also set up to have a wide torque spread, and it raced with different cams than used in that dyno chart.

Here's the engine (in race spec) against a 1.6 Voodoo II. Dyno chart. In this case, the naturally aspirated car would be faster And actually, the Targa car is faster than any other Miata that has ever run on our local track. Period.

But more importantly, for the Targa Newfoundland, the rules penalize turbo Miatas pretty badly. I was running in the same class as rally-prepped Honda Civics. A turbo Miata would be in the same class as a factory rally EVO with a factory driver and a Group B quattro! So going N/A wasn't a difficult decision.

There are no plans to put that header into production. The amount of time involved would make it prohibitively expensive. It took me two months to design and build.
Old 01-02-2009 | 02:40 PM
  #64  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Keith@FM
Yeesh. So much arguing.
welcome to the forum.
Old 01-02-2009 | 03:11 PM
  #65  
N3v's Avatar
N3v
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 314
Total Cats: 1
From: Nashville/Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Keith@FM
Yeesh. So much arguing.

The gains on that header were dynoed against a Racing Beat on the same engine. Blue is the crazy header, red is the RB. This was not the final race tune, but it's a direct comparison.
Dyno chart
this is amazing. This makes me want to build or have a header built.
ITBs are great for throttle response (real throttle response) but they're a pain in the butt to deal with when you have a big cam and large altitude changes.
I hear you on this. I thought i was just bad at tuning, but every time I make a long drive through mountains, my afr starts acting up once I start to increase in altitude beyond a certain point. I just have a switch that switches fuel maps to manage this problem right now and it works pretty well. Its interesting to find out that that's just a general issue with ITB's.
Here's the engine (in race spec) against a 1.6 Voodoo II. Dyno chart. In this case, the naturally aspirated car would be faster And actually, the Targa car is faster than any other Miata that has ever run on our local track. Period.
Also, just look at that curve. Its beautiful.
There are no plans to put that header into production. The amount of time involved would make it prohibitively expensive. It took me two months to design and build.
damn. I totally understand why though. Thanks for responding!
Old 01-05-2009 | 02:43 PM
  #66  
johnwag's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 670
Total Cats: 4
From: Plano,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Keith@FM
Note that the engine was built to be reliable above everything else, thus no ITBs and with safe timing numbers on 91 octane gas. ITBs are great for throttle response (real throttle response) but they're a pain in the butt to deal with when you have a big cam and large altitude changes. This car is also set up to have a wide torque spread, and it raced with different cams than used in that dyno chart.
Keith,

I've been looking at the dyno charts. I notice that both of your hp graphs have a noticeable dip from 3500 to 5000. Is this attributed to the design of the header or the profile of the cams?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
06-02-2017 03:36 PM
zephyrusaurai
Meet and Greet
2
09-28-2015 11:59 PM
ScrapinMX5
Meet and Greet
8
09-28-2015 02:04 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.