Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Successful 300whp, Stock 1.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2016 | 11:02 AM
  #1  
Rshannon1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 1
Default Successful 300whp, Stock 1.6

Got on the dyno this weekend and broke my goal of 300! I was running around 18psi from a Greddy turbo. Only 19* of timing and some meth. Pretty happy to hit that number.

Old 08-29-2016 | 12:18 PM
  #2  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Congrats. Thats amazing from that setup.
Was the dyno in "shootout" mode?
Old 08-29-2016 | 12:28 PM
  #3  
Rshannon1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 1
Default

Thanks! It was not. It was on a Dyno Dynamics, and that shop always has their CF at 1.03. So take away 3% and it's like 295. Still very happy with it. Tuned it so the torque stays around 250 to save parts. I swapped the 6 speed in this weekend as well, don't want to grenade the 5 speed.
Old 08-29-2016 | 12:37 PM
  #4  
viperormiata's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
From: Key West
Default

Congrats on the numbers. What's left of the Greddy setup?
Old 08-29-2016 | 12:41 PM
  #5  
Rshannon1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 1
Default

The turbo and the manifold. I was considering also ditching that manifold for a better flowing one, because I believe it could be a restriction in the upper rpm range. But since I'm buying a built motor next month it'd be better to wait and just run an absurd flow with a much bigger turbo.
Old 08-29-2016 | 01:16 PM
  #6  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Rshannon1
The turbo and the manifold. I was considering also ditching that manifold for a better flowing one, because I believe it could be a restriction in the upper rpm range. But since I'm buying a built motor next month it'd be better to wait and just run an absurd flow with a much bigger turbo.
You are buying a built 1.8 motor correct? Where are you getting your absurdflow setup from?
Old 08-29-2016 | 01:27 PM
  #7  
Rshannon1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 1
Default

It's a built 1.6. I know yeah yeah 1.8 is better. But it's a fully built motor with clutch, turbo, manifold, pnp head, valves, springs. EVERYTHING done to it. All for only 3k shipped, and has 500 miles on it. It's a stupid good deal. The slow spool I can make up for in revving it out. If I want to down the road I'll do a 1.8. But for that price, it's worth it imo. The absurd flow will come with that motor.
Old 08-29-2016 | 01:47 PM
  #8  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

You seem to be missing something. AbsurdFlow is a brand of turbo manifolds on here made by TurboTim. So every time you say that, I think of his manifolds. As far as I know he does not and has not ever built 1.6 manifolds.
Old 08-29-2016 | 01:53 PM
  #9  
olderguy's Avatar
AFM Crusader
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,685
Total Cats: 351
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

One of Tim's first manifolds was for a 1.6. It has been around the NE for awhile, but not on a built motor yet that I am aware of.
Old 08-29-2016 | 01:59 PM
  #10  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by olderguy
One of Tim's first manifolds was for a 1.6. It has been around the NE for awhile, but not on a built motor yet that I am aware of.
I did not know that. I am willing to bet, it is not going to this guy though.
Old 08-29-2016 | 02:05 PM
  #11  
Rshannon1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 1
Default

I meant to say absurd flow style. The shop he had it fabbed at based the design on the absurd flow.
Old 08-29-2016 | 02:09 PM
  #12  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Rshannon1
I meant to say absurd flow style. The shop he had it fabbed at based the design on the absurd flow.
OK. That makes a ton more sense and is reasonable.
Old 08-30-2016 | 12:39 PM
  #13  
NBoost's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 153
Total Cats: -84
From: Canton, GA
Default

250(+) / 250, at 5200 RPM.. No wonder it isn't breaking. Bet its a freight-train after 5k though. What are the "specs" on the Greddy turbo, the same unit that comes with the old 1.6 Greddy kit?
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
adryargument
Engine Performance
6
02-15-2022 07:23 AM
Feffman
Local Meets, Events and Tech Days
1
10-20-2016 08:26 AM
YankyMate
MSPNP
6
08-31-2016 09:45 AM
SJP0tato
MEGAsquirt
2
08-27-2016 07:00 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.