Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Skunk2 BP intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2017 | 04:28 PM
  #101  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default

On dyno today with Taxi. Preliminary results are that the spacers made no difference on this high hp N/A build. Made 182whp regardless of no, one or two spacers. Minor fluctuations in midrange power were just noise. Nothing repeatable. We did notice that the first pull after swapping parts with everything cold would give us a nice Dyno Queen number 3-5whp higher.

Stopping for lunch then we'll put the squaretop on. Plots will be posted tomorrow probably.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Leave a poscat 12 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017 | 05:34 PM
  #102  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017 | 09:19 PM
  #103  
ScratchNSniff's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 13
Total Cats: 1
Default

Looking good so far!!! Good info for sure!!!
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017 | 10:43 PM
  #104  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default Built N/A manifold test results

A few more hp between 7000-8000 just like the stock engine. The difference was the S2 lost a bunch of midrange in the process. That surprised us.
The plot line you see above the rest in the midrange is the square top. We repeated it a few times heat soaked and it stayed within 2whp. Of note was the way the S2 died at 7700. We had the fuel cut set at 8100 for the S2. The square top kept pulling past where the S2 nosed over so we bumped the limiter to 8300. This again, surprised us. While the S2 clearly flows more at peak, it does so only in a narrow rpm band then chokes. Perhaps that is the result of careful 2nd order resonance optimization but lower average velocity? That's the same type of thing with intake ports with big CFM numbers but low velocity. One big dyno peak but nothing before or after.

We saw the S2 gain about 6whp for an 800rpm window up high but lost the same 6whp over 1400rpm in the midrange. For a 6 spd car, it could be personal preference either way. For a 5 spd car with the wider ratios, the square top would be faster.
No gains form the spacers. We're putting the square top back on for Super Lap this week. So N/A at least, we're not seeing much to get excited about. How about those used square top price fluctuations?

It will be a few weeks before we get it on Bullet with the TSE EFR6258 kit. Based on these results though, I'm not expecting any gains there either.


__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Leave a poscat 11 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017 | 10:58 PM
  #105  
ysleem's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 567
Total Cats: 7
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
Default

Wow! Betcha sales won't continue on those skunk2s...thanks for all that Emilio!
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017 | 11:46 PM
  #106  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

They will. But now when some n00b starts spamming every other thread with "you should get the s2, you'll pick up power" I'll have more basis of slapping them.

I've nothing against the s2 at all, I'm glad it was made, but unless it's drastically different on a boosted car vs n/a, we now know why s2 didn't post any plots.

Last edited by 18psi; 11-08-2017 at 12:23 AM.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 12:12 AM
  #107  
ManiacLachy's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 128
Total Cats: 38
From: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Emilio and crew have proven the S2 matches the Flattop, right. So this is just an alternative (not an improvement), one that's available to purchase NIB from vendors. Still delivers the same gains over USDM manifolds, and probably a decent pick up for people with the cash to burn. If it's worth getting a flattop, it's worth considering the S2.

I'll be sticking to stock for sometime yet myself.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 02:14 AM
  #108  
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
From: Metro Detroit, MI
Default

Originally Posted by ysleem
Wow! Betcha sales won't continue on those skunk2s...thanks for all that Emilio!
Betcha they will.

Emilio proved (thank you so much btw), that the S2 holds up well to the Square top manifold as far as power numbers go. Bit lost in midrange for a bit gained in top-end. Given that the S2 weighs less, can be purchased brand new (not used off a 10 year old car with 100,000 miles from some guy on ebay named Steve), I say there's definitely still a place for them here. Also from personal experience, those doing VVT swaps will benefit greatly from the S2 manifold as they do not have to do any bending of fuel lines or shaving of the intake manifold to run the fuel lines. In addition, they grant much more room in to access fuel injectors and wiring.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 02:29 AM
  #109  
nitrodann's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
From: Newcastle, Australia
Default

I agree, those are all great points.

Dann
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 02:53 AM
  #110  
Lokiel's Avatar
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 260
From: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Default

... you also get a decent place to source your boost pressure from at the rear of the manifold - the square/flat-top requires tapping the rear of the manifold or sharing the brake booster barb).
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 10:32 AM
  #111  
SamS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,269
Total Cats: 7
From: Wisconsin
Default

I'd definitely consider it if it makes changing injectors easier. Man that was probably one of the hardest parts of my turbo install and I'm not looking forward to changing them every time I have to get emissions tested. Speaking of emissions, does eliminating the VTCS butterflies trigger a CEL on the stock ECU?
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 11:23 AM
  #112  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

It would be cool not to have to split the square top to access the injectors. But I'm still not turned on by how difficult it seems to be to install an s2. Either way, less what-if's and conjecture. I'll wait for boosted results.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 12:40 PM
  #113  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
How about those used square top price fluctuations?
LOL. "Blue Horseshoe loves Anacott Steel." -Wall Street

Last edited by hornetball; 11-08-2017 at 06:13 PM.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 02:05 PM
  #114  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

it's a buyers market
the bubble has burst
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 02:23 PM
  #115  
99mx5's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
Default

Thanks for posting this Emilio. Real data and not conjecture is what makes this forum. Props!
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 02:48 PM
  #116  
andyfloyd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,132
Total Cats: 97
From: Louisville,KY
Default

Surprising results, curious about it on a turbo car still however. Squaretop for the win so far it seems.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 05:52 PM
  #117  
Mobius's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by Goingnowherefast
Betcha they will.

Given that the S2 weighs less, can be purchased brand new (not used off a 10 year old car with 100,000 miles from some guy on ebay named Steve), I say there's definitely still a place for them here.
Yes, you can buy it new as opposed to a used Squaretop from a guy named Steve. The thing is ... there's literally nothing to fail on a squaretop intake manifold. There are no moving parts. At most you might need to have it washed in a parts cleaner, unless the thing has been physically damaged in some way. So, as far as used parts go, a squaretop purchase is about as low-risk as they get. And, the squaretop actually fits correctly without modification, which is somewhat inexcusable for Skunk2 to have done.

Originally Posted by SamS
I'd definitely consider it if it makes changing injectors easier. Man that was probably one of the hardest parts of my turbo install and I'm not looking forward to changing them every time I have to get emissions tested. Speaking of emissions, does eliminating the VTCS butterflies trigger a CEL on the stock ECU?
Yes, that is my understanding, that it throws a code. Perhaps @curly can chime in, I discussed this briefly with him at one point. @SamS if you need to meet obd2 emissions, you could consider using an Xede piggyback with the stock ecu. I happen to have one I could sell you. Easier (still a PITA, but easier) and less messy than swapping injectors.

Thanks Emilio for sharing this data with the community.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 06:02 PM
  #118  
Steve Dallas's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 421
Total Cats: 70
From: Republic of Texas
Default

I will have you all know that buying a square top off eBay from a guy named Steve is perfectly safe, and is a desirable thing to do. Furthermore, Steve is both an Analyist and a Therapist, also known as an Analrapist, so you would be in very good hands.
Leave a poscat 6 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 06:03 PM
  #119  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

And if you need further proof, you can check out his build thread on this very forum.

Does his license plate say "anustart"?

Last edited by 18psi; 11-08-2017 at 06:27 PM.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017 | 06:24 PM
  #120  
Lokiel's Avatar
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 260
From: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Default

Originally Posted by SamS
I'd definitely consider it if it makes changing injectors easier. Man that was probably one of the hardest parts of my turbo install and I'm not looking forward to changing them every time I have to get emissions tested. Speaking of emissions, does eliminating the VTCS butterflies trigger a CEL on the stock ECU?
You'll need to swap back the OEM intake manifold for the emissions testing too and re-install all the plumbing since VTCS-related CEL errors wont be the only CEL errors you'll get with the Skunk2 manifold (eg. emissions control errors).

If you think unbolting the top half of the OEM intake manifold to access your injectors is a hassle, you're in for a real world of pain swapping the lower half of the intake manifold.
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.