Low Vacuum & Running Rich on Fresh Build
#1
Low Vacuum & Running Rich on Fresh Build
I never thought I'd actually make a thread about this, but here I am.
Freshly [re]built NB motor with forged rods/pistons, 0.5mm overbore, 9.0 CR. Running what is essentially a Flyin Miata FM2 kit (GT2560R turbo setup), with an [unfortunate] Hydra 2.7.
Symptoms:
-The car runs rough and idles rough
-Pulls -12 to -15inHg of vacuum at best (380 to 450 mmHg or 42 to 51 kPa absolute)
-Runs ~17% rich across the board (haven't gone into boost yet) on a reasonable base map, meaning a volumetric efficiency of like 35% at idle...
What I've checked/tried:
-6 vacuum gauges used; all yield same numbers; hooked to upper backside of manifold as well as upper center
-No vacuum leaks; MAP tuned and ISC is operating at a reasonable 30 to 35%
-Ignition timing is good
-Cam timing is verified stock (no VVT; Mazdaspeed motor)
-Wideband sensor properly calibrated
-EGR is connected but valve is sealing well and has been run disconnected
-Injectors cleaned/tested by RC, flowing dead on with excellent spray patterns
-Tried new coils & wires; no luck
-Cold compression test gave about 175psi on all 4.
-All plugs look evenly white after idling
There are a few more obvious tests to do, but the above pretty much rules out any issue I can think of.
I'm tearing my hair out on this one... Any advice or ideas would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Freshly [re]built NB motor with forged rods/pistons, 0.5mm overbore, 9.0 CR. Running what is essentially a Flyin Miata FM2 kit (GT2560R turbo setup), with an [unfortunate] Hydra 2.7.
Symptoms:
-The car runs rough and idles rough
-Pulls -12 to -15inHg of vacuum at best (380 to 450 mmHg or 42 to 51 kPa absolute)
-Runs ~17% rich across the board (haven't gone into boost yet) on a reasonable base map, meaning a volumetric efficiency of like 35% at idle...
What I've checked/tried:
-6 vacuum gauges used; all yield same numbers; hooked to upper backside of manifold as well as upper center
-No vacuum leaks; MAP tuned and ISC is operating at a reasonable 30 to 35%
-Ignition timing is good
-Cam timing is verified stock (no VVT; Mazdaspeed motor)
-Wideband sensor properly calibrated
-EGR is connected but valve is sealing well and has been run disconnected
-Injectors cleaned/tested by RC, flowing dead on with excellent spray patterns
-Tried new coils & wires; no luck
-Cold compression test gave about 175psi on all 4.
-All plugs look evenly white after idling
There are a few more obvious tests to do, but the above pretty much rules out any issue I can think of.
I'm tearing my hair out on this one... Any advice or ideas would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Last edited by devgru38; 05-30-2013 at 02:52 AM.
#4
AFR is FUBAR likely because of bad vacuum. I've tuned the entire table lean 17% just to see the result. It runs just about dead on stoich, and still pulls bad vacuum... Also, leaning the engine out 17% from what it should be isn't acceptable; something's clearly wrong. 35% VE is not correct.
With worse vacuum, the ECU assumes there's load on the engine and goes higher up the fuel map, injecting more fuel. I think if I can sort out the vacuum issue the fueling will sort it self out.
#8
Are you positive the car is mechanically timed correctly.
If your intake/exhaust cams are both retarded by a belt tooth, the engine will pull less vacuum and run rich.
If your crank bolt was insufficiently torqued and the timing belt pulley has slipped, same result. In either case the ECU (stock or aftermarket, doesn't matter) will fire things at what it sees as the appropriate times, because the sensors say so, when in fact the engine is mechanically ahead of that point - thus everything is retarded.
If your intake/exhaust cams are both retarded by a belt tooth, the engine will pull less vacuum and run rich.
If your crank bolt was insufficiently torqued and the timing belt pulley has slipped, same result. In either case the ECU (stock or aftermarket, doesn't matter) will fire things at what it sees as the appropriate times, because the sensors say so, when in fact the engine is mechanically ahead of that point - thus everything is retarded.
#9
Are you positive the car is mechanically timed correctly.
If your intake/exhaust cams are both retarded by a belt tooth, the engine will pull less vacuum and run rich.
If your crank bolt was insufficiently torqued and the timing belt pulley has slipped, same result. In either case the ECU (stock or aftermarket, doesn't matter) will fire things at what it sees as the appropriate times, because the sensors say so, when in fact the engine is mechanically ahead of that point - thus everything is retarded.
If your intake/exhaust cams are both retarded by a belt tooth, the engine will pull less vacuum and run rich.
If your crank bolt was insufficiently torqued and the timing belt pulley has slipped, same result. In either case the ECU (stock or aftermarket, doesn't matter) will fire things at what it sees as the appropriate times, because the sensors say so, when in fact the engine is mechanically ahead of that point - thus everything is retarded.
So new question: my builder said he replaced all shims exactly as they were when he tore the motor apart; whether or not this is the case, they are all tight. Considering that the same shims were used, even if they were mis-ordered, how can this be? What can change valve lash across all valves without changing shims?
Also, idiot check on myself: would super tight valves be enough to fully explain these issues? Could that make enough of a difference to cause a 4 to 7 inHg decrease in vacuum?
Much thanks for the help!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
09-05-2015 09:02 AM