K series Miata swap
#121
I can tell everyone this much. In order to do this swap, you will need:
Adapter plate
Flywheel
custom crossmember with mounts
header
wiring harness (or DIY it)
Then you will need:
A motor
S2000 manifold
Kpro (price just dropped to $700)
A fuel setup
Then you may need other bits depending on what you want to do with the car, such as an upgraded clutch, oil pan baffle, upgraded radiator (although stock will work). Just depends how serious you want to get with it.
So going to be cheap? Not by some people's standards. Going to be cheaper than a V8 swap? Yes, probably by half. Going to be cheaper than a reliable track-oriented turbo setup? I would imagine so. (I've never built a turbo Miata setup though).
That's why we finally decided to make this happen. Its a great option to add a lot of reliable power for a fair cost (whatever that is, lol).
Adapter plate
Flywheel
custom crossmember with mounts
header
wiring harness (or DIY it)
Then you will need:
A motor
S2000 manifold
Kpro (price just dropped to $700)
A fuel setup
Then you may need other bits depending on what you want to do with the car, such as an upgraded clutch, oil pan baffle, upgraded radiator (although stock will work). Just depends how serious you want to get with it.
So going to be cheap? Not by some people's standards. Going to be cheaper than a V8 swap? Yes, probably by half. Going to be cheaper than a reliable track-oriented turbo setup? I would imagine so. (I've never built a turbo Miata setup though).
That's why we finally decided to make this happen. Its a great option to add a lot of reliable power for a fair cost (whatever that is, lol).
#135
Also in regards to the fuel setup, is the stock return style system not going to work? Or do you need to wire up something custom that the K-pro will control?
I just realized theses questions will undoubtedly be answered in your build thread, so I'll try to be more patient.
#136
K-Pro is a daughter board that goes inside the K series ECU. So you will need the ECU and some kind of harness (Id probably just make one), and you will have to do the ECU modifications to allow the installation of the K-Pro. I think most people get it done at Hondata.
Also, I think you will need an immobilizer and the VIN number associated with it so that you can reprogram the ECU to match the immobilizer. Or maybe you can disable the immobilizer all together. Not really sure.
I think MS3 would work really well for this. They just have VVT on the intake cam. Plus, everything is there to do speed-density with OEM parts, since the K series were still speed density at one point (and I think they mainatined a map sensor even after they went mass airflow).
Also, I think you will need an immobilizer and the VIN number associated with it so that you can reprogram the ECU to match the immobilizer. Or maybe you can disable the immobilizer all together. Not really sure.
I think MS3 would work really well for this. They just have VVT on the intake cam. Plus, everything is there to do speed-density with OEM parts, since the K series were still speed density at one point (and I think they mainatined a map sensor even after they went mass airflow).
#137
good questions, but neither of those options meet our goals.
S2000 is going to be 600 lbs. heavier at race weight, and a clean Miata is about 25% of the cost of a clean S. Miata is going to be a lot cheaper and faster for a K swap. Not to mention the high cost of parts/consumables of the S vs. an NA or NB.
As far as the NC, same problem. Lot higher cost for the car, plus turbo, which is something we are not interested in for road racing at this time.
We've all heard "cheap, fast, reliable, pick two." Well this is our best attempt to pick all three.
2200 lb. with driver, and 230 whp, 190 wtq with 100% OEM Honda engine/reliablility. Thats not going to happen with an S or NC, especially at the price point we are going for.
S2000 is going to be 600 lbs. heavier at race weight, and a clean Miata is about 25% of the cost of a clean S. Miata is going to be a lot cheaper and faster for a K swap. Not to mention the high cost of parts/consumables of the S vs. an NA or NB.
As far as the NC, same problem. Lot higher cost for the car, plus turbo, which is something we are not interested in for road racing at this time.
We've all heard "cheap, fast, reliable, pick two." Well this is our best attempt to pick all three.
2200 lb. with driver, and 230 whp, 190 wtq with 100% OEM Honda engine/reliablility. Thats not going to happen with an S or NC, especially at the price point we are going for.
#138
Kpro can disable the immobilizer so you don't have to worry about that. I still think it would be easier to use ms3 and adapt the engine harness rather than have to adapt the harness from the ecu and use Kpro. But maybe there is something I'm missing. The biggest advantage I see about Kpro is that you can fake obd2 readiness codes.
#139
Can someone smarter than I am tell me how this is going to work? Will the engine harness alone be controlled by the K-Pro ? Is there potential to use MS3 to control this thing, or would that be a huge pita? The EMS and wiring part of this swap is the only part that really makes me cringe.
Also in regards to the fuel setup, is the stock return style system not going to work? Or do you need to wire up something custom that the K-pro will control?
I just realized theses questions will undoubtedly be answered in your build thread, so I'll try to be more patient.
Also in regards to the fuel setup, is the stock return style system not going to work? Or do you need to wire up something custom that the K-pro will control?
I just realized theses questions will undoubtedly be answered in your build thread, so I'll try to be more patient.
For the ECU, yes, a Kpro’d ECU disables the immobilizer, and there is no need to obtain a VIN# to do so. We talked about using MS for this, but that’s not going to be possible for a few reasons. The whole car will run on a Kpro ECU.
FTB – the K has VVT (variable valve timing) on both intake and exhaust cams, but it has VTC only on the intake cam. This allows for continuous VTC cam angle adjustment to optimize power/torque at any point in the power band. It used oil pressure to either advance or retard timing by 25 degrees in either direction. Until VTC existed, tuners were limited to one set cam angle for the entire powerband, such as other DOHC VTEC B series and F series engines. A K engine tuner can set the intake cam advance at any angle at any place on the MAP.
I don’t believe MS is able to control VTC, which is one reason why a K series EMS must be used.
#140
..FTB – the K has VVT (variable valve timing) on both intake and exhaust cams, but it has VTC only on the intake cam. This allows for continuous VTC cam angle adjustment to optimize power/torque at any point in the power band. It used oil pressure to either advance or retard timing by 25 degrees in either direction. Until VTC existed, tuners were limited to one set cam angle for the entire powerband, such as other DOHC VTEC B series and F series engines. A K engine tuner can set the intake cam advance at any angle at any place on the MAP.
I don’t believe MS is able to control VTC, which is one reason why a K series EMS must be used.
I don’t believe MS is able to control VTC, which is one reason why a K series EMS must be used.
__________________