Few engine refreshing tips needed
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
Then what the **** good is it? first is next to useless as it is with the 5 speed! There must be a diff ratio that will make the first 5 gears of the 6 speed the same as the 5 speed and then have 6th as an over overdrive
#23
In an n/a car, first gear is not useless. I would be willing to bet that when you get it running, you will be turning about 1000 rpm or more from stock. Get the car together first, then start driving it. Ask yourself what you plan to do with the car, then make a decision what gear and transmission you will use.
I have a five speed and love it. N/A cars do not make enough power to be concerned about breaking a five speed, which answers your question about what good is a 6 speed. They can tolerate a lot more power and torque.
#24
The good part is twofold, 6 speeds are stronger (not a big issue with NA cars), and they're closer ratio than a 5 speed (less needed on turbo cars, great for n/a cars). Closer ratios are a good thing on a built n/a which is going to have a narrower power band, you won't find yourself wanting that 3 1/2 gear coming out of corners as often.
#26
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,455
Total Cats: 6,874
I haven't been able to find anything to contradict this. All evidence suggests that the 5 speeds got the 4.30 while the 4 and 6 speeds got the 4.10, regardless of whether there was a turbo or not.
#28
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
I've been doing some research mainly at Solomiata and they say:
4.1 94-97 Miata and 99+ automatic Miata
4.3 90-93 99 Miata stick
3.636 2001+ Australian 6-speed
3.909 Miata 6-speed, RX-7 automatic, 79-83 RX-7 all
This could all be bullshit but FM now run solomiata so I'd like to think they check it.
So it looks like my car has a 4.1 diff ratio, 2fast reccon this should suffice?
The gear breakdown for the 5 & 6 Speed
5 Speed 1st 3.136 2nd 1.888 3rd 1.330 4th 1.00 5th .814
6 Speed 1st 3.76 2nd 2.269 3rd 1.645 4th 1.2575th 1.00 6th .843
So yes the 6 speed will raise revs, bad for cruising but good for n/a performance and like Rennkafer says a nice close ratio box.
Is the 6 speed much different to use than a 5 speed, my box is feeling quite stiff nowadays not always wanting to slip into gear easily. I hear the 6 speed is quite slick?
Once I start driving the car I think I will have to do a comparison of revs in each gear for the 5 speed with a 4.1 and a 6 speed with a 3.9 to see if that will net me my extra gear if I still want it.
#29
comparison of 5 and 6 spds with both having 4.1 diffs:
same but the 6 spd with a 3.9 diff:
same but 6 spd diff at 3.636:
Comparison of mph speeds stock rev limit/5 spd vs 6 spd with 8k rev limit (built n/a engine), both 4.1 diffs:
For those who'd like to run their own comparisons... I found this gear comparison calculator here (the above were just screenshots)
Fatboy Raceworks Graphical Transmission Gear Ratio Calculator
#31
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
Awsome! Thanks for going the extra mile with the comparisons. So it's looking like the 6 speed with a 3.636 is going to give me a very similar setup to what I have now but with the extra gear that I wanted.
What's really confusing me now is the ratios for 1st 2nd and 3rd. Looking at the quaife gear sets for both the miata and other cars such as my buddy's westfield they have really long 1 2 & 3 why? Certainly for hillclimbs and sprints which is what the Westfield does
I would have thought low gears would be used to keep the engine where the power is. :s
I'm not really sure why I'm even considering a gearbox swap yet, I still need to save up for cams yet!! Another total ******* mystery to me
What's really confusing me now is the ratios for 1st 2nd and 3rd. Looking at the quaife gear sets for both the miata and other cars such as my buddy's westfield they have really long 1 2 & 3 why? Certainly for hillclimbs and sprints which is what the Westfield does
I would have thought low gears would be used to keep the engine where the power is. :s
I'm not really sure why I'm even considering a gearbox swap yet, I still need to save up for cams yet!! Another total ******* mystery to me
#32
Awsome! Thanks for going the extra mile with the comparisons. So it's looking like the 6 speed with a 3.636 is going to give me a very similar setup to what I have now but with the extra gear that I wanted.
What's really confusing me now is the ratios for 1st 2nd and 3rd. Looking at the quaife gear sets for both the miata and other cars such as my buddy's westfield they have really long 1 2 & 3 why? Certainly for hillclimbs and sprints which is what the Westfield does
I would have thought low gears would be used to keep the engine where the power is. :s
I'm not really sure why I'm even considering a gearbox swap yet, I still need to save up for cams yet!! Another total ******* mystery to me
What's really confusing me now is the ratios for 1st 2nd and 3rd. Looking at the quaife gear sets for both the miata and other cars such as my buddy's westfield they have really long 1 2 & 3 why? Certainly for hillclimbs and sprints which is what the Westfield does
I would have thought low gears would be used to keep the engine where the power is. :s
I'm not really sure why I'm even considering a gearbox swap yet, I still need to save up for cams yet!! Another total ******* mystery to me
#38
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
Ok next series of questions. I have pulled the crank now and gone over it with the micrometer. Endfloat and main bearings are perfect at just above mid limit and the surface looks good. The rod jornals have a nice surface on them but are close to bottom limit. The rod shells show the expected polishing at the top and bottom. Can I assume that this is all ok to go ahead with seeing as it's all within haynes manual tolerances?
Also my oil seals seem to have worn slight polished grooves in their "journals" front and back and the haynes manual seems to get a bit enthusiastic over this saying that the crank should be ground and a sleeve pressed on! This seems extreme, I mean it wasn't actually leaking before I tore the motor down. Any opinions? I'm going with "if it ain't broke don't fix it" for now until Im told otherwise.
Tia
Also my oil seals seem to have worn slight polished grooves in their "journals" front and back and the haynes manual seems to get a bit enthusiastic over this saying that the crank should be ground and a sleeve pressed on! This seems extreme, I mean it wasn't actually leaking before I tore the motor down. Any opinions? I'm going with "if it ain't broke don't fix it" for now until Im told otherwise.
Tia
#40
Junior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bristol
Posts: 439
Total Cats: 0
I'll try and grab some more pics when I finish the head off. Its now getting +1mm stainless ferrea valves
Which brings me to my next question. Can someone with a workshop manual for the 99 tell me what the standard valve seat Dimensions and angles are? Damn haynes manual doesn't stipulate just says take it to a machine shop.
And no one have any info on my oil seal grooves mentioned above?
Which brings me to my next question. Can someone with a workshop manual for the 99 tell me what the standard valve seat Dimensions and angles are? Damn haynes manual doesn't stipulate just says take it to a machine shop.
And no one have any info on my oil seal grooves mentioned above?