Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Another installed LS Coils Post

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2018 | 12:20 PM
  #1  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default Another installed LS Coils Post

Hello all. After much research on this forum and head scratching and advice from other members, I finally installed my LS coils. There are some great brackets available but either didn't fit my truck coils OR required removal of the shock tower brace. I came up with an alternative that made me happy. I used a generic relocation bracket that required modification, welding an extra piece and extended threaded rod, and extended valve cover bolts with aluminum tubing spacers. I used Flyin' Miata's instruction for wiring it into the Hydra. A set of cut to size plug wires from MSD, following instructions from the Passion Channel on You Tube rounded out the parts needed. Total cost was around $150. I copied ignition settings from a friends car that has the FM setup. Car started right up and runs and pulls flawlessly so far.

i appreciate the help from other people who have done this before and I'll be glad to contribute if anyone has any questions about my install.

Paul
Attached Thumbnails Another installed LS Coils Post-img_5301.jpg  
Old 01-28-2018 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
Lokiel's Avatar
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 260
From: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Default

Did you not see the Singular LS coil bracket?

This should have worked for you and doesn't locate the wiring over the hottest part of the engine bay.
Old 01-28-2018 | 08:24 PM
  #3  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

For all the wiring I ended up splitting a cheap set of coil harnesses and relocation cables from Amazon. Worked with the singular and SADFab brackets swell. Just cut an end off the relocation cable and wire like you would any cop.


​​​​​
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XYVWSGD/ref=pd_aw_fbt_263_img_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=M8EM6W6WD9SX1FJWWSDZ https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XYVWSGD/ref=pd_aw_fbt_263_img_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=M8EM6W6WD9SX1FJWWSDZ


https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XYWWY12/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1517185273&sr=8-2-spons&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=ls+relocation&psc=1 https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XYWWY12/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1517185273&sr=8-2-spons&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_FMwebp_QL65&keywords=ls+relocation&psc=1
Old 01-29-2018 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Lokiel
Did you not see the Singular LS coil bracket?

This should have worked for you and doesn't locate the wiring over the hottest part of the engine bay.
I actually bought a Hawley Performance bracket, but it was for a different size coil. I might have looked at the Singular bracket but perhaps it wouldn't clear the VVT oil line? I was concerned about the heat but, as Curly pointed out, the coils in their normal position on GM engines are located immediately above the exhaust manifold. There are a lot of good bracket options out there but each one has its own compromise. More choices exist for non VVT engines and for the smaller coils. If this solution works well long term, it might be an alternative for others.Paul
Old 01-29-2018 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
For all the wiring I ended up splitting a cheap set of coil harnesses and relocation cables from Amazon. Worked with the singular and SADFab brackets swell. Just cut an end off the relocation cable and wire like you would any cop.


​​​​​https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XY...6WD9SX1FJWWSDZ


https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XY...location&psc=1
I'm set up for sequential ignition, I'm not sure the Amazon adapter would have helped. The hardest part of the project was adding two new pins to the Hydra connector for cylinders 2 and 4. I had to have my electronic Genius friend do that for me.I tend to break little wires, particularly if they are crucial ones. Splicing the rest of it together was really easy.Paul
Old 01-29-2018 | 07:36 PM
  #6  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by pmhellings
I'm set up for sequential ignition, I'm not sure the Amazon adapter would have helped. The hardest part of the project was adding two new pins to the Hydra connector for cylinders 2 and 4. I had to have my electronic Genius friend do that for me.I tend to break little wires, particularly if they are crucial ones. Splicing the rest of it together was really easy.Paul
I'm also setup for sequential. It helped because it's wired individually. You just run your two extra wires to the corresponding coil. This isn't rocket science.

You get your pre-wired options for power, ground, signal which I didn't use since it's output from megasquirt directly, then your 4 coils. I think the hardest part of your setup is that you have hydra.
Old 01-29-2018 | 07:37 PM
  #7  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Originally Posted by pmhellings
I actually bought a Hawley Performance bracket, but it was for a different size coil. I might have looked at the Singular bracket but perhaps it wouldn't clear the VVT oil line? I was concerned about the heat but, as Curly pointed out, the coils in their normal position on GM engines are located immediately above the exhaust manifold. There are a lot of good bracket options out there but each one has its own compromise. More choices exist for non VVT engines and for the smaller coils. If this solution works well long term, it might be an alternative for others.Paul
If you looked, you'd know SADFab clears everything. It was designed explicitly to fit all valve covers in its original iteration. Oh look, here's that prefab harness that works perfectly.

Old 01-29-2018 | 09:34 PM
  #8  
Lokiel's Avatar
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,014
Total Cats: 260
From: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Default

^
OP has D514A CNPS (mount points on front and rear) rather than D585 CNPS (mount points on top & bottom).
Also, the SADFAB bracket may not clear the OP's front strut brace - when I was trying to figure out how/where to mount D585s the Front Strut brace was always in the way so I switched to D514As and independently came up with a bracket similar to the Singular one (except my coils are upside down from theirs to improve hood clearance - not just because I'm in Australia).

Last edited by Lokiel; 01-29-2018 at 10:05 PM.
Old 01-29-2018 | 10:01 PM
  #9  
TheBandit's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,185
Total Cats: 57
From: Broken Arrow,Ok
Default

Can confirm. He didn't return our kit due to poor fitment. He ended up using a differnt style coil that has alternative mounting that neither SadFab or our bracket provides.

Glad you got it up and running!
Old 01-29-2018 | 10:13 PM
  #10  
tetraruby's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by Lokiel
Did you not see the Singular LS coil bracket?

This should have worked for you and doesn't locate the wiring over the hottest part of the engine bay.
Doesn't look like these are still offered for sale, looking at the Singular website.
Old 01-29-2018 | 10:28 PM
  #11  
albuquerquefx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 199
Total Cats: 31
From: Memphis, TN
Default

LS coils fix everything, even boosted NC's...
Old 01-30-2018 | 08:29 AM
  #12  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default

As others, who have installed LS coils, have mentioned there was no noticeable change in performance. Maybe it idled a little smoother? I haven't had ignition issues except MAYBE last week when it was very cold for NE Florida and I detected a few misses while passing a string of cars in 3rd gear. I assumed it was due to colder air being denser and causing me to hit the boost limit (12.6) but it may have been spark blowout. Either way, new plugs are gapped at .035 instead of the .027 before. Has to mean better combustion, maybe cleaner tailpipe emissions? That makes my car almost a Prius!

Paul
Old 01-30-2018 | 09:14 AM
  #13  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21,117
Total Cats: 3,142
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I had trouble finding something else on the SADFab website a couple of months ago. Things aren't always there.
Old 01-30-2018 | 04:38 PM
  #14  
albuquerquefx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 199
Total Cats: 31
From: Memphis, TN
Default

Originally Posted by pmhellings
As others, who have installed LS coils, have mentioned there was no noticeable change in performance. Maybe it idled a little smoother? I haven't had ignition issues except MAYBE last week when it was very cold for NE Florida and I detected a few misses while passing a string of cars in 3rd gear. I assumed it was due to colder air being denser and causing me to hit the boost limit (12.6) but it may have been spark blowout. Either way, new plugs are gapped at .035 instead of the .027 before. Has to mean better combustion, maybe cleaner tailpipe emissions? That makes my car almost a Prius!
In a sense, coils discharge at the energy level necessary to jump the gap; larger coils can thus handle larger gap and/or more resistance within the gap. As such, there is no specific performance change under circumstances where the factory setup was adequate. For my NC (and insofar as I'm aware, my NC is the very first one to ever get LS coils...) i was getting measurable power loss at ~15psi above 6000 RPM's. I have a paper dynojet printout where spark breakup was visible at 5k , with significant chop at the end of a 7500 RPM run-up. For manifold pressures above 18psi, my instrumented performance data showed power was flatlining, even though my EFR 6758 still had plenty of compressor map space left to give. At this point, I was already running a gap down to 0.018" and finally gave up trying to make it even smaller.

Swapping to LS coils and moving back to the ITV24 default gap of 0.032" immediately netted ~30whp as instrumented by two dozen Torque and EcuTeK data logs piped through vDyno. The only change for these runs was the coil swap and related dwell mapping change. Since then, I've been able to add in a touch more timing and a bit less fuel, and have netted probably another 5-10whp give or take.

Upgraded coils matter at high cylinder pressures, which equates to high cylinder air/fuel density. And it's a measurable change, once you've hit the wall on the stock ignition.
Old 01-30-2018 | 04:53 PM
  #15  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by albuquerquefx
In a sense, coils discharge at the energy level necessary to jump the gap; larger coils can thus handle larger gap and/or more resistance within the gap. As such, there is no specific performance change under circumstances where the factory setup was adequate. For my NC (and insofar as I'm aware, my NC is the very first one to ever get LS coils...) i was getting measurable power loss at ~15psi above 6000 RPM's. I have a paper dynojet printout where spark breakup was visible at 5k , with significant chop at the end of a 7500 RPM run-up. For manifold pressures above 18psi, my instrumented performance data showed power was flatlining, even though my EFR 6758 still had plenty of compressor map space left to give. At this point, I was already running a gap down to 0.018" and finally gave up trying to make it even smaller.

Swapping to LS coils and moving back to the ITV24 default gap of 0.032" immediately netted ~30whp as instrumented by two dozen Torque and EcuTeK data logs piped through vDyno. The only change for these runs was the coil swap and related dwell mapping change. Since then, I've been able to add in a touch more timing and a bit less fuel, and have netted probably another 5-10whp give or take.

Upgraded coils matter at high cylinder pressures, which equates to high cylinder air/fuel density. And it's a measurable change, once you've hit the wall on the stock ignition.
Well stated. My boost right now is limited to 12 psi. as I am on stock internals and the VVT engine has a higher compression ratio than earlier engines. One of my motivations for installing the LS coils was just to do it, and the other is that a future engine is in the works with forged rods and lower compression. At that time, I'll be able to increase boost a bit, and it will be nice to have less variables and projects to sort out with the new engine.

Paul
Old 01-30-2018 | 06:20 PM
  #16  
mx5psi's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 209
Total Cats: 35
Default

I just went with a generic 4 coil holder on the fire wall obviously all our stuff is on the correct side here in OZ but iam sure you could put it on the opposing side.


Old 01-30-2018 | 10:44 PM
  #17  
albuquerquefx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 199
Total Cats: 31
From: Memphis, TN
Default

Originally Posted by pmhellings
My boost right now is limited to 12 psi. as I am on stock internals and the VVT engine has a higher compression ratio than earlier engines.
My stock 10.8:1 compression on also-stock internals is waving "hi!" to your stock 10:1 compression on stock internals BOOST CARS, ACQUIRE CATS. ALLOFIT, SON!

I logged 22psi on the way to work yesterday. At some point, I'm gonna lift the head off the block of this NC engine hehehe... If E85 was available in this area, I'd shoot for 400 at the tires.
Old 01-31-2018 | 08:31 AM
  #18  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by albuquerquefx
My stock 10.8:1 compression on also-stock internals is waving "hi!" to your stock 10:1 compression on stock internals BOOST CARS, ACQUIRE CATS. ALLOFIT, SON!

I logged 22psi on the way to work yesterday. At some point, I'm gonna lift the head off the block of this NC engine hehehe... If E85 was available in this area, I'd shoot for 400 at the tires.
Good for you. I doubt that my engine is up to 22 psi on the stock rods. I kind of like it un- ventilated and running.

Paul
Old 01-31-2018 | 11:49 AM
  #19  
albuquerquefx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 199
Total Cats: 31
From: Memphis, TN
Default

I was hoping my "ALLOFIT!!" statement would demonstrate my intentions of being snarky

I know the older blocks aren't safe for a ton of boost at the lower end. The NC2's and later get the unfair advantage of better internals, and I'm only running those ridiculous boost numbers at the top end of the RPM band. I'm still not entirely sure 22psi is "safe" either, but I'm also willingly putting myself out there since apparently nobody else has. The 3rd gens really are the red-headed-bastard-stepchildren of the Miata world

Anyway, please don't take my comments as anything but banter.
Old 01-31-2018 | 04:44 PM
  #20  
pmhellings's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Total Cats: 18
From: Green Cove Springs, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by albuquerquefx
I was hoping my "ALLOFIT!!" statement would demonstrate my intentions of being snarky

I know the older blocks aren't safe for a ton of boost at the lower end. The NC2's and later get the unfair advantage of better internals, and I'm only running those ridiculous boost numbers at the top end of the RPM band. I'm still not entirely sure 22psi is "safe" either, but I'm also willingly putting myself out there since apparently nobody else has. The 3rd gens really are the red-headed-bastard-stepchildren of the Miata world

Anyway, please don't take my comments as anything but banter.
No,offense taken. Interesting to see you working with the NC. "Red headed stepchild" is quite apt. NC's have a lot of advantages. They fit larger people well and handle nicely out of the box,I've been told. What kind of turbo are you using to generate 22psi?

Paul



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 AM.