Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

all-motor time: extreme mpg daily driver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2009 | 12:31 AM
  #21  
leatherface24's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
From: Pembroke Pines
Default

Went the low budget all motor route on my last na and i loved every minute of it. I had a stock 02 bottom end, 97 head with supertech valve springs, custom coldside intake and custom exhaust all o.n the stock ecu. I made 112 rwhp and the car ripped. I plan on doing that again with a 90-93
Old 06-21-2009 | 12:41 AM
  #22  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Originally Posted by leatherface24
stock 02 bottom end, 97 head with supertech valve springs, custom coldside intake and custom exhaust all o.n the stock ecu. I made 112 rwhp
Cool. 6-7whp less than a competitive 1.6 liter Spec Miata, and proof that most people who build NA motors are morons.
Old 06-21-2009 | 01:06 AM
  #23  
crashnscar's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
From: Bay Area, California
Default

Originally Posted by leatherface24
Went the low budget all motor route on my last na and i loved every minute of it. I had a stock 02 bottom end, 97 head with supertech valve springs, custom coldside intake and custom exhaust all o.n the stock ecu. I made 112 rwhp and the car ripped. I plan on doing that again with a 90-93
Originally Posted by Savington
Cool. 6-7whp less than a competitive 1.6 liter Spec Miata, and proof that most people who build NA motors are morons.
+1.... my "stock" 1.6 makes 118rwhp.... real great power out of your build man.
Old 06-21-2009 | 09:40 AM
  #24  
hustler's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Cool. 6-7whp less than a competitive 1.6 liter Spec Miata, and proof that most people who build NA motors are morons.
throttle response > power

meh, I need a motot either way and I'm not dropping $4k on a turbo and $1500 on a motor.
Old 06-23-2009 | 09:27 PM
  #25  
AlexO35's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 448
Total Cats: 1
From: Binghamton, NY
Default

The best I pulled NA w/ MS was about 35mpg avg 75mpg over 300miles. Including a food stop.

Only changes was a deep DIY air dam, COPs, 2 1/2" cat and cat back, bike mufflers, and a bit of lightness. The motor hadn't been opened.

I'd imagine adding the compression and a lean tune should get you closer to 40. Driven normally, not like gramps.
--Alex
Old 06-23-2009 | 11:13 PM
  #26  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Wrong car, wrong motor for high MPG.

I had a 97 Civic HX (lean burn VTEC-E motor), which got 37 mpg if I drove it gently on the freeway cruising at 75-80 mph. It never got less than 27 mpg city driving with a lead foot. With sways, springs, shocks and select poly bushings the car handled great and was fun to drive.
Old 06-23-2009 | 11:41 PM
  #27  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

what if you welded one each of the intake/exhaust valves closed and ran oversized on the others...
Old 06-24-2009 | 10:49 AM
  #28  
leatherface24's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
From: Pembroke Pines
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Cool. 6-7whp less than a competitive 1.6 liter Spec Miata, and proof that most people who build NA motors are morons.
it wasnt a "built" na motor by any means. it was cheap enough and the throttle response was awesome. I know how to build a proper na motor if i had the funds to do so . no need for the name calling.
Old 06-24-2009 | 10:54 AM
  #29  
leatherface24's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,064
Total Cats: 10
From: Pembroke Pines
Default

Originally Posted by crashnscar
+1.... my "stock" 1.6 makes 118rwhp.... real great power out of your build man.
Old 06-24-2009 | 02:13 PM
  #30  
The_Pipefather's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 854
Total Cats: 14
From: Troy, MI
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
A lot of these honda guys are getting 45+mpg by running 17:1 with like 32*advance. I want some of that action.
Not gonna happen on a B6 or BP. Honda's combustion chamber and port geometry is much more conducive to burning lean (almost stratified) mixtures efficiently. Not to mention the fact that the mild lobe on their VTEC camshaft provides way higher dynamic compression, thus allowing even leaner mixtures.

If you want efficiency throw out the BP and put in a D15 or D16 Honda. It'll also get you that elusive 40/60 weight distribution the MR2 guys enjoy.
Old 06-24-2009 | 02:35 PM
  #31  
johnwag's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 670
Total Cats: 4
From: Plano,TX
Default

It's pretty sad, really. The B6 and BP engines just can't compete in n/a form. While reading this thread I kept saying to myself, "honda engine". Gary@trackdogracing is in the process of building a high comp. n/a motor. By "in the process", i mean who the hell knows when he'll finish it.

It's pretty hard to beat the budget n/a setup that emilio is running.

Some of you guys have seen my build thread. My track car is pretty fast for what it is and it allows the driver to drive at 10/10ths, like a spec miata. It's pretty rewarding to make tiny changes and see slight car improvements and large driving improvements. Driver is still everything.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
bigmackloud
Miata parts for sale/trade
19
01-08-2021 11:24 AM
nick470
MEGAsquirt
7
06-16-2017 01:53 PM
Voltwings
Cars for sale/trade
0
09-27-2015 06:40 PM



Quick Reply: all-motor time: extreme mpg daily driver



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 AM.