Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

2.0L BP4W 182whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:29 PM
  #1  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default 2.0L BP4W 182whp



This is the engine we built for the OGK last year. Finally found time to get it into a car and run it. Some details:

85.5mm, 11.0:1Supertech pistons shaved to get to 10.5:1 BP4W, ported and polished SuperMiata shim under bucket lifters, Supertech 1mm oversize valves, Supertech single valve springs, custom .425 lift, 272° cams, lightened crank, BE oil pump, M-Tuned forged rods, ACL race bearings, adjustable cam gears, MS3 DIY PnP with sequential fuel, Racing Beat header, square top intake manifold, OEM T/B, COPs Toyota.

We spent about an hour on the dyno today with it. Still needs another hour or so to get the rest out of it. Still has a fairly conservative timing map and can probably take another 2-3° above 5000rpm. Have not messed with cam gears yet and that will probably yield some gains.

Running CA91 here. Rev limiter set at 8200 but it was still pulling obviously. Guessing it'll nose over at 8400 or so. 272° isn't very long and I don't think the OEM square top will allow much more than that. In fact, I'm wondering if the flat power isn't an indication of intake restriction from the manifold. We'll see the next time we go back. We have a B18/BP4w hybrid manifold to throw on there. That and E85 will get it past 200whp I'm sure.

Then we add the C30-94, or Borg-Warner 6258
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR

Last edited by emilio700; 02-16-2012 at 01:57 AM. Reason: F7
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:30 PM
  #2  
soviet's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 268
From: VA
Default

image attachments hate you :(
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:32 PM
  #3  
flounder's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,524
Total Cats: 31
From: Detroit
Default

Good HP numbers, but how much torque is that red x laying down?
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:35 PM
  #4  
samnavy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,457
Total Cats: 325
From: VaBch, VA
Default

Mad skillz... they be mine! Linked from 949 and m.net.


This is the engine we built for the OGK last year. Finally found time to get it into a car and run it.
Some details:

85.5mm, 11.0:1 Supertech pistons shaved to get to 10.5:1
BP4W, ported and polished
SuperMiata shim under bucket lifters
Supertech 1mm oversize valves
Supertech single valve springs
Custom .425 lift, 272° cams
Lightened crank
BE oil pump
M-Tuned forged rods
ACL race bearings
Adjustable cam gears
MS3 DIY PnP with sequential fuel
Racing Beat header
Square top intake manifold
OEM T/B
COPs, Toyota

We spent about an hour on the dyno today with it. Still needs another hour or so to get the rest out of it. Still has a fairly conservative timing map and can probably take another 2-3° above 5000rpm. Have not messed with cam gears yet and that will probably yield some gains.

Running CA91 here. Rev limiter set at 8200 but it was still pulling obviously. Guessing it'll nose over at 8400 or so. 272° isn't very long and I don't think the OEM square top will allow much more than that. In fact, I'm wondering if the flat power isn't an indication of intake restriction from the manifold. We'll see the next time we go back. We have a B18/BP4w hybrid manifold to throw on there. That and E85 will get it past 200whp I'm sure.

Then we add the C30-94, or Borg-Warner 6258 or 7064. Decisions..
Attached Thumbnails 2.0L BP4W 182whp-crusher_dyno_021012_w.gif  
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:42 PM
  #5  
vehicular's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,855
Total Cats: 47
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

I'd guess the header is more of a restriction than the intake. The collectors suck ding ding, and the primaries are pretty small on the RB header.
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:42 PM
  #6  
vehicular's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,855
Total Cats: 47
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

BTW, did you guys sonic check the cylinders on the block you used, or have you found Miata blocks to be plenty thick for the 85.5 bore size?
Old 02-10-2012 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
Mad skillz... they be mine! Linked from 949 and m.net.
Aww, you took all the fun out of it. I wanted everyone to guess what the engine was. Image thing is a mt.net glitch.

As long as we're sharing..

M-Tuned fuel rail
Injector Dynamics 1000cc @ 60psi
Hondata manifold gasket
NGK BKR7EIX-11

Originally Posted by vehicular
BTW, did you guys sonic check the cylinders on the block you used, or have you found Miata blocks to be plenty thick for the 85.5 bore size?
We sonic test every engine we build.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Old 02-10-2012 | 10:18 PM
  #8  
g_reichow's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Total Cats: 0
From: NoVa
Default

Emilio, any way you'd post the current maps for that thing? I'm building a similar motor and could use a great starting point!

Thanks,
Greer
Old 02-10-2012 | 10:20 PM
  #9  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default

Originally Posted by g_reichow
Emilio, any way you'd post the current maps for that thing? I'm building a similar motor and could use a great starting point!

Thanks,
Greer
Nope. Use MS3. Pay for Tuner Studio. Let software tune your car for you. Win.

I do some manual here and there when the changes are big, or experimenting but we get some great looking datalogs letting the software tune itself.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Old 02-10-2012 | 10:39 PM
  #10  
Oscar's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
From: Bolton, UK
Default

I know what I'll be building now
Old 02-10-2012 | 10:59 PM
  #11  
mcarp22's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 117
Total Cats: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by samnavy
I'm wondering if the flat power isn't an indication of intake restriction from the manifold.
There's a manifold for the chrysler 2.0 (neon) with huge runners / plenum that makes the power flatten like that:

Attached Thumbnails 2.0L BP4W 182whp-indyfinal.gif  
Old 02-10-2012 | 11:04 PM
  #12  
vehicular's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,855
Total Cats: 47
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
We sonic test every engine we build.

Have you found many that aren't suitable for use with the bore that large, or are most of them fine? 2.5mm over sounds REALLY big for pedestrian engines like this.
Old 02-10-2012 | 11:07 PM
  #13  
g_reichow's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Total Cats: 0
From: NoVa
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
Nope. Use MS3. Pay for Tuner Studio. Let software tune your car for you. Win.

I do some manual here and there when the changes are big, or experimenting but we get some great looking datalogs letting the software tune itself.
Well my tec-2 is driving the motor so tuner studio and ms3 just aint there right now. I was looking for timing & a/f values as a reference.

-Greer
Old 02-10-2012 | 11:24 PM
  #14  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default

Originally Posted by g_reichow
Well my tec-2 is driving the motor so tuner studio and ms3 just aint there right now. I was looking for timing & a/f values as a reference.

-Greer
12.8-13.0 AFR. 26~32° on top
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Old 02-10-2012 | 11:46 PM
  #15  
g_reichow's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 161
Total Cats: 0
From: NoVa
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
12.8-13.0 AFR. 26~32° on top
Thanks, I'll work between the OE maps I can grab and some stuff here. I appreciate it. The tec-2 is outdated so support is limited but any bit of data helps.

-Greer
Old 02-10-2012 | 11:49 PM
  #16  
doward's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,569
Total Cats: 780
From: Columbus, OH
Default

This is VERY relevant to my interests.

Fantastic numbers so far Emilio!
Old 02-11-2012 | 01:25 AM
  #17  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Where did you get the cams from?
Old 02-11-2012 | 01:34 AM
  #18  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
Where did you get the cams from?
Custom from Steve Gruenwald (Integral) before he sold his designs to Megacycle. Good luck getting cams from them.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
Old 02-11-2012 | 05:12 AM
  #19  
Reverant's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,991
Total Cats: 362
From: Athens, Greece
Default

Head gasket?
Old 02-11-2012 | 05:17 AM
  #20  
emilio700's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,407
Total Cats: 2,432
Default

Originally Posted by Reverant
Head gasket?
Stock 94-00, trimmed a few thou to clear pistons.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.