1.8 NB Oil Pumps?
#1
1.8 NB Oil Pumps?
I'm putting my 1.8 back together and MMD lists two Oil pumps for NB 1.8s:
Pump, Eng Oil
99-03 BP4W-14-100A
04 BP6D-14-100
The '99 to '03 pump is less than half the cost of the '04 pump. Did Mazda increase pressure or flow in '04 for the oil supply to the MSM turbo? Any ideas what the difference is? I did some searching and found this thread https://www.miataturbo.net/showthrea...t=56016&page=2from 3/11 where Joe presented this question:
I don't know that I need to go crazy on this build but is it safe to say I want the more expensive pump listed for '04? Did the newer pumps get beefier for VVT in '01 or for the turbo in '04? The MSM doesn't have VVT but I can't imagine they would have gone backwards to an inferior pump - especially with the added demands of turbo oiling. The shortblock I'm building is from an '04 MSM and will be basically stock with China rods. Thoughts?
Pump, Eng Oil
99-03 BP4W-14-100A
04 BP6D-14-100
The '99 to '03 pump is less than half the cost of the '04 pump. Did Mazda increase pressure or flow in '04 for the oil supply to the MSM turbo? Any ideas what the difference is? I did some searching and found this thread https://www.miataturbo.net/showthrea...t=56016&page=2from 3/11 where Joe presented this question:
In '99, everything changed. The assembly went through three major revisions, starting at BP4W-14-100 (through VIN-9301), moving through BP5A-14-100 (VIN 9301-0701), and ending at BP6D-14-100. None of these are similar to any NA, and I wouldn't expect them to be. Crank sensor, remember? (Distressingly, I can't find any part numbers for the actual cast housing.) The internal changes for the first rev change (at 9301) were fairly trivial. At the 0701 change, however, they changed the internal gears. Prior to that, they were the same as the NA. Afterwards, they went to inner = BP6D-14-132 and outer = BP6D-14-141. These pumps are all noted as applying to engines with a casting mark of "BP4W", which is definitely the '99-'00 engine.
The last catalog I have is for '01, and it's where things get weird. I downloaded this catalog directly from Mazdaspeed Motorsports' website (link) and it's marked "Mazda MX-5 Miata, USA & Canada ('01 > )"
That catalog lists exactly the same oil pump and internals as the '99 catalog. It also says that the casting mark should say "BP4W".
Trivia time for owners of VVT engines: Does the casting mark on your engine still say BP4W, or did they update it to read BP-Z3?
The last catalog I have is for '01, and it's where things get weird. I downloaded this catalog directly from Mazdaspeed Motorsports' website (link) and it's marked "Mazda MX-5 Miata, USA & Canada ('01 > )"
That catalog lists exactly the same oil pump and internals as the '99 catalog. It also says that the casting mark should say "BP4W".
Trivia time for owners of VVT engines: Does the casting mark on your engine still say BP4W, or did they update it to read BP-Z3?
#4
Sounds like you've researched most of what I know:
Mazda continued to use the same oil pump in '99 and '00
In 2001, with the addition of VVT, mazda changed to an oil pump with a slightly higher volume.
At some point in time after changing to the higher volume oil pump, mazda then superceded the '99-00 oil pump part number with the newer high volume part number. NA cars retained the smaller pump part number.
The difference in the oil pump is the thickness of the oil pump gears which also means the housing was machined larger in order to match. The actual dimensional difference between the two oil pumps is 19 thousandths of an inch. The gears are indistinguishable when not next to one another, but if you lay the two on a flat surface and run your fingernail across them, you'll notice that one is indeed thicker than the other. The only circumstance where this could be a problem is if you tried to put aftermarket gears of one vintage into a housing of the other vintage. The smaller gears wont prime in the larger housing, and the larger gears wont fit into the smaller one.
With regard to a change in '04, this is news to me. I would have expected mazda to use the same VVT pump in the turbo model, but I have no evidence to support my theory. If you are using a water cooled turbo, your engine wont see a substantial increase in oil use from the turbo feed, each individual piston squirter probably uses more oil than the turbo.
You could call the mazdaspeed guys if you like, they've got a solid knowledge of anything you'll find in a spec series, and I expect that they've been asked before "wtf" with regard to the pump pricing.
Mazda continued to use the same oil pump in '99 and '00
In 2001, with the addition of VVT, mazda changed to an oil pump with a slightly higher volume.
At some point in time after changing to the higher volume oil pump, mazda then superceded the '99-00 oil pump part number with the newer high volume part number. NA cars retained the smaller pump part number.
The difference in the oil pump is the thickness of the oil pump gears which also means the housing was machined larger in order to match. The actual dimensional difference between the two oil pumps is 19 thousandths of an inch. The gears are indistinguishable when not next to one another, but if you lay the two on a flat surface and run your fingernail across them, you'll notice that one is indeed thicker than the other. The only circumstance where this could be a problem is if you tried to put aftermarket gears of one vintage into a housing of the other vintage. The smaller gears wont prime in the larger housing, and the larger gears wont fit into the smaller one.
With regard to a change in '04, this is news to me. I would have expected mazda to use the same VVT pump in the turbo model, but I have no evidence to support my theory. If you are using a water cooled turbo, your engine wont see a substantial increase in oil use from the turbo feed, each individual piston squirter probably uses more oil than the turbo.
You could call the mazdaspeed guys if you like, they've got a solid knowledge of anything you'll find in a spec series, and I expect that they've been asked before "wtf" with regard to the pump pricing.
#6
Thanks. I'm one of the mazdaspeed guys who is supposed to know and we don't usually do a lot of cross vintage builds. Everything I have read supports what you are saying with the puzzling exception of MMDs part number break between '03 and '04 instead of '00 and '01 like it should be. I guess this isn't the first time a parts list is off by a few years. I'll buy the bigger pump and be done with it . Thanks!
#7
When I took off my 99, there was the o-ring and a paper gasket. Funny thing was, the o-ring was stuck to the block and the paper gasket was stuck on the pump side. Since the pump has a relief in it for the o-ring, I put that in first and then using a small amount of sealant I stuck the paper gasket on top of the pump surface, added some sealant to the other side and then installed it on to the block. I'm having my doubts about this?
The paper gasket covered up the o-ring so basically it's block, paper gasket, oring, pump. I am hoping that the ring still seals with paper inbetween the ring/block surface.
The paper gasket covered up the o-ring so basically it's block, paper gasket, oring, pump. I am hoping that the ring still seals with paper inbetween the ring/block surface.
#9
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
In 2001, with the addition of VVT, mazda changed to an oil pump with a slightly higher volume.
(...)
The difference in the oil pump is the thickness of the oil pump gears which also means the housing was machined larger in order to match. The actual dimensional difference between the two oil pumps is 19 thousandths of an inch. The gears are indistinguishable when not next to one another, but if you lay the two on a flat surface and run your fingernail across them, you'll notice that one is indeed thicker than the other.
(...)
The difference in the oil pump is the thickness of the oil pump gears which also means the housing was machined larger in order to match. The actual dimensional difference between the two oil pumps is 19 thousandths of an inch. The gears are indistinguishable when not next to one another, but if you lay the two on a flat surface and run your fingernail across them, you'll notice that one is indeed thicker than the other.
#12
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
The difference as compared to an NA pump is apparently quite small, but essesntially, yes.
As Jeff and Sav have noted, this all applied only to original manufacture; these days, the later-style pump is spec'd as the replacement part for all.
I can't imagine that the MSM would have received a unique pump. Its oiling requirement is less than a non-MSM engine of the same year, as the MSMs didn't get VVT.
MSM even more or the same?
I can't imagine that the MSM would have received a unique pump. Its oiling requirement is less than a non-MSM engine of the same year, as the MSMs didn't get VVT.
#14
I chose the 2001 pump because Mazda made it for the VVT application. Other wise I could have just reused my 94 pump. Because of the additional demands of the VVT, the larger volume is welcomed. Now if I was going to boost it, there would be a Boundry Engineering pump being installed, but with my "girly" N/A build, it is not needed.
So another question - I was planning on using a Boundry pump with my 94 block and VVT head. When HOT, will there be enough flow pressure to operate the VVT without issues - using Rotella 1040? I'm assuming it won't be a problem if I shim the pump - but we all know how that goes.
#15
So another question - I was planning on using a Boundry pump with my 94 block and VVT head. When HOT, will there be enough flow pressure to operate the VVT without issues - using Rotella 1040? I'm assuming it won't be a problem if I shim the pump - but we all know how that goes.
#17
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
The difference as compared to an NA pump is apparently quite small, but essesntially, yes.
As Jeff and Sav have noted, this all applied only to original manufacture; these days, the later-style pump is spec'd as the replacement part for all.
I can't imagine that the MSM would have received a unique pump. Its oiling requirement is less than a non-MSM engine of the same year, as the MSMs didn't get VVT.
MSM even more or the same?
I can't imagine that the MSM would have received a unique pump. Its oiling requirement is less than a non-MSM engine of the same year, as the MSMs didn't get VVT.
#19
So I've got a 99 OEM pump. I'm going to get something from boundary engineering. I'm leaning towards the 01-05 gears since they're billit and flow more than the 99-00 gears would but will they fit in the 99-00 housing correctly? Should I just bump it up to the street/strip setup with 2 or 3 shims? Racer assembly worth another $100 over the street/strip setup? FYI running a 1.9 up to possibily 500 but probably around 300 most of the time.
What's the best course of action here? What's overkill? What's not enough?
What's the best course of action here? What's overkill? What's not enough?
#20
So I've got a 99 OEM pump. I'm going to get something from boundary engineering. I'm leaning towards the 01-05 gears since they're billit and flow more than the 99-00 gears would but will they fit in the 99-00 housing correctly? Should I just bump it up to the street/strip setup with 2 or 3 shims? Racer assembly worth another $100 over the street/strip setup? FYI running a 1.9 up to possibily 500 but probably around 300 most of the time.
What's the best course of action here? What's overkill? What's not enough?
What's the best course of action here? What's overkill? What's not enough?