Who says you can't have EBC at 2x mech. boost?
#1
Who says you can't have EBC at >2x mech. boost?
I've a 5 psi can, and after a 6speed install, recently raised boost from 10 to 15 psi. No prob. I think the key is to have a proper open loop table, and proper PID. AEM has no 'D', so I built a circuit to add D.
Last edited by JasonC SBB; 09-10-2011 at 03:43 PM.
#4
I'm amazed that the internal spring on your actuator is able to keep the flapper closed during boost rise. That afaik is the typical mechanical issue with IWG and boost control that is much higher than the actuator's rating. And the reason I had to add a helper spring to my IWG setup.
#8
The "common wisdom" is that you can't have boost >2x can boost, because it'll overshoot or sag or oscillate. I have 3x and with just one round of tuning I have no spikes no oscillations, and very little sag (undershoot, actually) which I haven't bothered to tune out yet.
I attribute the performance to having a real 'D' and a "linearizer" circuit. (AEM doesn't have 'D' and I added a circuit to implement it)
I looked into the math and a 3way solenoid can indeed theoretically cause issues when running something like 3x can boost. A 2 way solenoid with a properly sized bleeder won't. The problem with a 3way is that as duty cycles go very high (>65% or so), the resulting boost becomes very sensitive to duty cycle. e.g.:
duty boost
40% 8 psi
50% 10 psi
60% 13 psi
70% 18 psi
80% 26 psi
That is, the effect of the 3way is highly nonlinear at very high duty cycles. This can cause oscillation at high boost. The solution, is to use a 2way solenoid, or what I did, which was to linearize it (like a lookup table to compress teh duty cycle) I built it into my D circuit. I didn't expect it to work very well but it did.
BTW 2 way solenoids have more control response lag than a 3way, and require 'D' even more so than 3 ways. This is because 2 way solenoids require a restrictor in the boost feed (sense) line.
I attribute the performance to having a real 'D' and a "linearizer" circuit. (AEM doesn't have 'D' and I added a circuit to implement it)
I looked into the math and a 3way solenoid can indeed theoretically cause issues when running something like 3x can boost. A 2 way solenoid with a properly sized bleeder won't. The problem with a 3way is that as duty cycles go very high (>65% or so), the resulting boost becomes very sensitive to duty cycle. e.g.:
duty boost
40% 8 psi
50% 10 psi
60% 13 psi
70% 18 psi
80% 26 psi
That is, the effect of the 3way is highly nonlinear at very high duty cycles. This can cause oscillation at high boost. The solution, is to use a 2way solenoid, or what I did, which was to linearize it (like a lookup table to compress teh duty cycle) I built it into my D circuit. I didn't expect it to work very well but it did.
BTW 2 way solenoids have more control response lag than a 3way, and require 'D' even more so than 3 ways. This is because 2 way solenoids require a restrictor in the boost feed (sense) line.
Last edited by JasonC SBB; 09-10-2011 at 03:19 PM.
#10
The log shows 4 WOT events. The first 3 are at ~5500 RPM, the 4th is at ~3800 RPM.
I tried stabbing the throttle at 5500 RPM because that would normally show bad overshoot. The 'D' arrests the overshoot significantly (< 1 psi) but then there's a slight undershoot. Without the 'D' circuit, at just 10 psi target, I could get 5 psi of overshoot. In the above log the worst undershoot is 10 kPa (where the cursor is)
When I stab the throttle at 3800 RPM there is no overshoot and no undershoot and the boost is pretty darn flat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post