Spark retardation and turbo spool
#1
Want fries with that?
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 2,011
Total Cats: 2
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have always tuned spark so that it shrinks as the RPMs rise. I have been looking at a couple of other people's maps and I noticed they do the opposite of mine.
It got me wondering, does retarded spark at lower RPMs and ambient (and slightly above) air pressure help the turbo spool?
My line of reasoning
1. Retarded spark = less energy used in engine, later gas burning
2. Less energy in engine = more energy goes to exhaust
3. More energy goes to exhaust = more energy goes to turbo
4. More energy to turbo = faster spool.
I will post my map when I get home. Is this line of thought correct or am I way off?
It got me wondering, does retarded spark at lower RPMs and ambient (and slightly above) air pressure help the turbo spool?
My line of reasoning
1. Retarded spark = less energy used in engine, later gas burning
2. Less energy in engine = more energy goes to exhaust
3. More energy goes to exhaust = more energy goes to turbo
4. More energy to turbo = faster spool.
I will post my map when I get home. Is this line of thought correct or am I way off?
#2
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most tuners dip the timing and fuel right before boost onset using the same logic. It helps the turbo spool a little quicker and hit a little harder.
At peak boost/load is where you wanna be careful with timing.
Up top when boost/torque starts tapering most start tapering timing up to provide a more flat/linear torque/power curve and get a good looking curve.
At peak boost/load is where you wanna be careful with timing.
Up top when boost/torque starts tapering most start tapering timing up to provide a more flat/linear torque/power curve and get a good looking curve.
#3
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have always tuned spark so that it shrinks as the RPMs rise. I have been looking at a couple of other people's maps and I noticed they do the opposite of mine.
It got me wondering, does retarded spark at lower RPMs and ambient (and slightly above) air pressure help the turbo spool?
My line of reasoning
1. Retarded spark = less energy used in engine, later gas burning
2. Less energy in engine = more energy goes to exhaust
3. More energy goes to exhaust = more energy goes to turbo
4. More energy to turbo = faster spool.
I will post my map when I get home. Is this line of thought correct or am I way off?
It got me wondering, does retarded spark at lower RPMs and ambient (and slightly above) air pressure help the turbo spool?
My line of reasoning
1. Retarded spark = less energy used in engine, later gas burning
2. Less energy in engine = more energy goes to exhaust
3. More energy goes to exhaust = more energy goes to turbo
4. More energy to turbo = faster spool.
I will post my map when I get home. Is this line of thought correct or am I way off?
#4
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
How much timing are you pulling on the onset of boost? I can see this making sense from the perspective that if you are tuning for 20psi. Who cares if you retard the spark as you are passing through ...15,16,17...psi because you are only there for a fraction of a second.
What is the consensus on this? Should we be running uber conservative up to target? From a detonation perspective.....Don't you have to pull more timing to get rid of det once it has started than you do to keep it from happening to begin with???
What is the consensus on this? Should we be running uber conservative up to target? From a detonation perspective.....Don't you have to pull more timing to get rid of det once it has started than you do to keep it from happening to begin with???
#5
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
if you have a powerful ecu with multiple spark mod factors you can tune it to help out there.
couple this with an electronic boost control solinoid connected directly to this ecu and you can mess with PWM to allow you to spool the turbo as soon as your specific setup will allow.
i gained 400rpm of spool with timing and EBC going from what my car was tuned for off the WG. Fairly substantial if you ask me.
i ended up pulling about 3.4 degrees at the maximum cell. this was with smoothing into the adjacent cells as well... never have walls of timing jump in your timing map or your car will drive like ****.
couple this with an electronic boost control solinoid connected directly to this ecu and you can mess with PWM to allow you to spool the turbo as soon as your specific setup will allow.
i gained 400rpm of spool with timing and EBC going from what my car was tuned for off the WG. Fairly substantial if you ask me.
i ended up pulling about 3.4 degrees at the maximum cell. this was with smoothing into the adjacent cells as well... never have walls of timing jump in your timing map or your car will drive like ****.
#7
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That doesnt look terribly retarded.... looks like a smooth transition into boost besides your cells between 55 and 75kpa all the way across the board.
This is where MS3 or a nice ECU would make sense with their ability to have more load breakpoints to better define cruise vs load cells as well as TPS varibles.
This is where MS3 or a nice ECU would make sense with their ability to have more load breakpoints to better define cruise vs load cells as well as TPS varibles.
#8
Boost Czar
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/admin.png)
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
doesn't look like a smooth transition at all...
as soon as you hit boost you're dropping around 10° timing, just like that for no good reason.
IMHO, timing retard should be gradual as the load and rpms increase.
as soon as you hit boost you're dropping around 10° timing, just like that for no good reason.
IMHO, timing retard should be gradual as the load and rpms increase.
#10
Boost Czar
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/supporter1.gif)
![](/mt2011/images_td/ranks/admin.png)
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
![Default](https://www.miataturbo.net/images/icons/icon1.gif)
look at the map i posted in the other thread.
![](http://www.boostedmiata.com/gallery2/d/10079-2/ms-III_explained.jpg)
This is how my path of timing looks when I drive around and get on boost. As the load increase, I start retarding the timing. At peak torque I have retarded to my in boost target.
I haven't found any benefit with retarding spool the way you have shown in your map, or by adding/subtracting fuel in the same area. Although I haven't gone crazy with the timing retard...but I'm not drag racing the car, so I don't care.
![](http://www.boostedmiata.com/gallery2/d/10079-2/ms-III_explained.jpg)
This is how my path of timing looks when I drive around and get on boost. As the load increase, I start retarding the timing. At peak torque I have retarded to my in boost target.
I haven't found any benefit with retarding spool the way you have shown in your map, or by adding/subtracting fuel in the same area. Although I haven't gone crazy with the timing retard...but I'm not drag racing the car, so I don't care.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post