Trackspeed Engineering/ABUSRDflow - GT2871R, E85, 1.9L 8.6:1 - 351whp/294tq/17psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2010 | 06:48 PM
  #21  
Bryce's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,759
Total Cats: 35
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Holy mother of pearl!

That's awesome Sav.
Old 07-25-2010 | 07:05 PM
  #22  
hustler's Avatar
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
From: Republic of Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
probably the combination of all the hardware, though I can vouch for VVT being responsible for 500 rpm of spool improvement by itself.
I picked-up 800rpm of spool going from the BEGi log to the AF stuff.
Old 07-25-2010 | 07:21 PM
  #23  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Yeah but I have a tubular equal-length exh manifold, a 3" Enthuza exhaust, a EBC/MBC, a 0.64 AR turbine housing, and a good tune.

Just found this. Here is another 2871 reporting excellent spool with a BEGI cast manifold.
https://www.miataturbo.net/showpost....5&postcount=23
Old 07-25-2010 | 07:45 PM
  #24  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

VVT is worth 500-600rpm of that, the AF is worth the rest. It's more than 800rpm too because I'm spooling a .86 A/R housing.

Timing map is hurr. There's not a lot of effort into this vs. the last time I was on the dyno, mostly in the 5000-7000rpm range and 211/225 rows. E85 + low-comp = lots of timing. I never heard any detonation, but I will pull the plugs to confirm that since the car is so loud.

Name:  351whp-ignition.png
Views: 262
Size:  151.6 KB
Old 07-25-2010 | 09:49 PM
  #25  
ftjandra's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 286
Total Cats: 8
From: Boulder, CO
Default

What was the duty cycle with the ID1000's and what base fuel pressure were you running?

Thanks,
--Ferdi
Old 07-25-2010 | 09:58 PM
  #26  
turotufas's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,304
Total Cats: 7
From: Gainesville,Fl
Default

Awesome, I want that...

Old 07-25-2010 | 10:10 PM
  #27  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

ZX, post your boost curve starting at 2000rpm and ending at redline. The torque curve from your dyno chart indicates that the boost might be coming in really slowly. It shouldn't bell-curve like that, it should rise and then flatten out like turns101 and my graphs do.
Old 07-25-2010 | 10:12 PM
  #28  
y8s's Avatar
y8s
DEI liberal femininity
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 574
From: Fake Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by hustler
I picked-up 800rpm of spool going from the BEGi log to the AF stuff.
i wouldn't know about that. I started with a equalish-length long tube manifold. I'm sure that's why I dont complain much about the 2876 spool.
Old 07-26-2010 | 12:17 AM
  #29  
ZX-Tex's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,847
Total Cats: 27
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
ZX, post your boost curve starting at 2000rpm and ending at redline. The torque curve from your dyno chart indicates that the boost might be coming in really slowly. It shouldn't bell-curve like that, it should rise and then flatten out like turns101 and my graphs do.
Yeah it is a bit weird I agree. It is not the boost curve since that builds and holds (stays flat) very nicely.

I found a couple of things since the dyno session that could explain it. I might have to go back for another tune session. Anyway, not trying to jack the thread, sorry.
Old 07-26-2010 | 01:45 PM
  #30  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

BTW have you tried futzing with an exhaust cam gear?
Old 07-26-2010 | 03:47 PM
  #31  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

I have not. Have you? Any gains?
Old 07-26-2010 | 04:11 PM
  #32  
jtothawhat's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,376
Total Cats: 4
From: Chicagoland
Default

Originally Posted by ftjandra
What was the duty cycle with the ID1000's and what base fuel pressure were you running?

Thanks,
--Ferdi
Very interested as well, I would think the 1000's would start to run out to steam at that power level and E85.
Old 07-26-2010 | 04:17 PM
  #33  
JasonC SBB's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
I have not. Have you? Any gains?
Yes, with my wee GT2554, but not on a dyno. It helped spool at the bottom, and topend both, when I advanced it by 5* (crank). The gain in topend was shown with street-logging-"dyno" runs - the torque didn't drop off as much. However, I couldn't tell you if it lost midrange. The spoolup was the most noticeable effect, and I liked it so I kept it. It also raised EGT though, but with you and E85 it should be a non issue.

BTW do you know of anyone naturally aspirated who's tried your intake manifold or similar?
In theory the manifold operation doesn't get affected by being boosted or not - IOW the same % topend gains should be visible in an N/A car.
UNLESS... there's a 2rd order effect where an n/a car's exhaust scavenging interacts with the intake runner resonance which isn't present with turbo cars.
Old 07-26-2010 | 04:56 PM
  #34  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Sav, I too am very interested in the duty cycles and base pressure question that was asked 3 times already. I don't have an afpr and am wondering how long I'll be able to go without one (or how high in power) before I'll NEED one.

Oh and just wondering: how much did you have to add/adjust the fuel map for e85? Just 30%?
Did the cranking enrichments have to be bumped up a ton?

Last edited by 18psi; 07-26-2010 at 05:07 PM.
Old 07-26-2010 | 06:08 PM
  #35  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

AEM does cranking enrichments as a percentage of the fuel map so there was no adjustment necessary. I did add about 20% to the fuel map as well as the base pressure bump (43psi to ~70psi).

I don't know the duty cycles off the top of my head and I can't pull logs from the AEM (I think my USB adapter corrupts them but I'm not sure). I will take a laptop log this weekend at an autocross and let you guys know what they are.
Old 07-26-2010 | 06:14 PM
  #36  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Great. Thank you
Old 07-31-2010 | 04:09 PM
  #37  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

I was cleaning out my room today and I found my old 2554R dyno chart. The low-end torque comparison is super interesting so I charted it. The 2871R combined with a low-comp motor and E85 gives nothing up to the 2554R down low and absolutely destroys it up top.

Name:  GT2554RvsGT2871R.jpg
Views: 292
Size:  32.2 KB

Full setups are as follows

GT2554R:
-stock '99 longblock, stock head, stock cams
-'99 IM w/ VICS switchover at 5000rpm
-3" catless Enthuza exhaust
-MSPNP, pump gas

GT2871R:
-8.6:1 shortblock, stock VVT head, stock cams
-Blox B18 IM, B18 TB
-open 3" exhaust
-AEM
-E85
Old 07-31-2010 | 04:43 PM
  #38  
shlammed's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
From: Kingston, Ontario
Default

big turbo wins again.

i noticed myself using the exact same manifold but with having been converted to TiAL turbine housing that you can spool up faster.

both of my setups used the same wg and spring, but one was a 2860RS and one was a 2871R both 0.86 AR housings. the 2871R map log looks identical to the 2860 but it obviously flows more.
Old 08-02-2010 | 11:27 PM
  #39  
Trackwhore's Avatar
Guest
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 87
Total Cats: -9
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
GT2871R:
-8.6:1 shortblock, stock VVT head, stock cams
-Blox B18 IM, B18 TB
-open 3" exhaust
-AEM
-E85
New or old exhaust manifold?
Old 08-07-2010 | 03:15 PM
  #40  
Savington's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Yeah, I did forget to mention that. The old 2554R chart is the old BEGi setup, the new 2871R chart is my ballin' AF setup.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.