GT2554R Record??? leads to a run of the mill EFR build
#21
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
BEGi exhaust manifold
3" exhaust
ms3 (seq. fueling & seq. spark)
93 octane
really horrible $50 460cc rx7 injectors and the stock fuel pump
16° timing in boost
I started adding boost up top, like you, after I did this dyno:
Those are corrected number from the dyno dynamics it was run on, but it matched all my other dynojet runs pretty spot on.
overlaying them they are pretty close, i never liked how it spooled on the dyno in this plot, it always logged much more lineraly like yours.
nice to see someone else not suck at 1.6L though
Last edited by Braineack; 02-23-2016 at 11:53 AM.
#24
What 18 means is, optimize your exhaust mani & full exhaust... Like what I said.
A doughnut vband 2560 + EWG would be purrfect (even if you stick with your 2554)
A GT28, yes you'll loose dat spool. A GTX28 will be 'close' to a 2560 spool but will hit like a hammer later on.
#28
He's saying you don't need all those fueling mods, but if you got em, who cares, it's better to have an overbuilt system anyway
And don't take the criticism too hard, I'm sure your setup is great, and if you like it then that's all that matters.
It looks like a very solid setup
But comments like "better than 1.8" will get trolled
And don't take the criticism too hard, I'm sure your setup is great, and if you like it then that's all that matters.
It looks like a very solid setup
But comments like "better than 1.8" will get trolled
#29
TheCarPassionChannel
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
He's saying you don't need all those fueling mods, but if you got em, who cares, it's better to have an overbuilt system anyway
And don't take the criticism too hard, I'm sure your setup is great, and if you like it then that's all that matters.
It looks like a very solid setup
But comments like "better than 1.8" will get trolled
And don't take the criticism too hard, I'm sure your setup is great, and if you like it then that's all that matters.
It looks like a very solid setup
But comments like "better than 1.8" will get trolled
#31
TheCarPassionChannel
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
Side note, on the logs it definitely looks different, my car spools in 4th on the dyno like 3rd or 2nd on the street. Peak boost on the dyno in 4th is at 36-37 where in 4th on the street it's around 30-31.
#34
TheCarPassionChannel
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
Since you called me out for not replying to your post, it was because it's a VD. Doing a pull on the road compared to a DynoJet yields significantly faster spool up. I'll turn my boost down to 9.5psi and do a 4th gear VD pull on the street and post it up for comparison.
#35
You say t3 doesn't spool, sounds like it's about the same to me. You say you hit full boost at 3200 on the street, I'm at 10 pounds before 3K. This is why I called you out on youtube...
Your budget build would be much easier if you just set a t3 on the taco log. No dumbass shitty adapters held down by swiss cheese home depot bolts to stretch.
Your budget build would be much easier if you just set a t3 on the taco log. No dumbass shitty adapters held down by swiss cheese home depot bolts to stretch.
#36
TheCarPassionChannel
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 188
Total Cats: 136
You say t3 doesn't spool, sounds like it's about the same to me. You say you hit full boost at 3200 on the street, I'm at 10 pounds before 3K. This is why I called you out on youtube...
Your budget build would be much easier if you just set a t3 on the taco log. No dumbass shitty adapters held down by swiss cheese home depot bolts to stretch.
Your budget build would be much easier if you just set a t3 on the taco log. No dumbass shitty adapters held down by swiss cheese home depot bolts to stretch.