China 2871 dyno run built 1.8l 280hp 250tq 20psi
#1
China 2871 dyno run built 1.8l 280hp 250tq 20psi
Here is my recent dyno tune. It's a load Eddy steady state dynojet 224XLC. I was going for a safe tune that would give me no risk for detonation. I was hoping to break the 300whp mark at 20psi, but it didn't happen.
There was a strange intermittent drop at 6k rpm that we think is coming from my cop harness. I've bought some replacement cop connectors with wires already attached to eliminate my shoddy craftsmanship.
Two runs are logged. The "clean" run and one with the drop.
Where do I go from here? I'm going to get a Map Daddy sensor so I will feel comfortable going to 24-25psi. I think the standard diypnp sensor is only good for 21-22 psi. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Before increasing the boost to that level, I am going to dial in the closed loop boost settings. The steady state tuning of the none boost cells made for a very nice drive home.
My diypnp psi and the dynojet differed by about 1 psi. The diypnp was about a pound higher. He pulled his point from a vac port on the front of the manifold. I pull my MS reading from a port that is shared with the fuel injector rail. Should I change mine to a different spot?
Feel free to add ideas, areas for improvements, thoughts on what could cause the intermittent drop at 6000rpm.
Also this is with an intake cam gear retarded by 7 degrees.
Fourth gear pulls with 6sp and 4.10 rear
There was a strange intermittent drop at 6k rpm that we think is coming from my cop harness. I've bought some replacement cop connectors with wires already attached to eliminate my shoddy craftsmanship.
Two runs are logged. The "clean" run and one with the drop.
Where do I go from here? I'm going to get a Map Daddy sensor so I will feel comfortable going to 24-25psi. I think the standard diypnp sensor is only good for 21-22 psi. Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Before increasing the boost to that level, I am going to dial in the closed loop boost settings. The steady state tuning of the none boost cells made for a very nice drive home.
My diypnp psi and the dynojet differed by about 1 psi. The diypnp was about a pound higher. He pulled his point from a vac port on the front of the manifold. I pull my MS reading from a port that is shared with the fuel injector rail. Should I change mine to a different spot?
Feel free to add ideas, areas for improvements, thoughts on what could cause the intermittent drop at 6000rpm.
Also this is with an intake cam gear retarded by 7 degrees.
Fourth gear pulls with 6sp and 4.10 rear
Last edited by miatauser884; 09-27-2010 at 10:40 AM.
#3
As much as I'd like to stroke your ego, 280whp at 20psi is a little lackluster, especially with an ARtech setup and retarded intake cam. Your timing map isn't particularly conservative either (16 degrees at 240kpa) - I'm only 2-3 degrees up on you (~19 degrees at ~220kpa). Before the Honda IM and E85, I was seeing ~265whp at 14psi, and on the old '99 motor it was 300+whp/wtq at 18psi.
Two theories: Either there's some .64 A/R housing phale occurring, or the chinabay 2870s aren't performing like a genuine Garrett does. Phil had the same thing - 2870, 26psi and water injection producing less than 300whp/300wtq.
The setup looks good - good manifold, good exhaust, I like the retarded intake cam gear and all the rest of it, but something is lacking for sure.
Two theories: Either there's some .64 A/R housing phale occurring, or the chinabay 2870s aren't performing like a genuine Garrett does. Phil had the same thing - 2870, 26psi and water injection producing less than 300whp/300wtq.
The setup looks good - good manifold, good exhaust, I like the retarded intake cam gear and all the rest of it, but something is lacking for sure.
#5
As much as I'd like to stroke your ego, 280whp at 20psi is a little lackluster, especially with an ARtech setup and retarded intake cam. Your timing map isn't particularly conservative either (16 degrees at 240kpa) - I'm only 2-3 degrees up on you (~19 degrees at ~220kpa). Before the Honda IM and E85, I was seeing ~265whp at 14psi, and on the old '99 motor it was 300+whp/wtq at 18psi.
Two theories: Either there's some .64 A/R housing phale occurring, or the chinabay 2870s aren't performing like a genuine Garrett does. Phil had the same thing - 2870, 26psi and water injection producing less than 300whp/300wtq.
The setup looks good - good manifold, good exhaust, I like the retarded intake cam gear and all the rest of it, but something is lacking for sure.
Two theories: Either there's some .64 A/R housing phale occurring, or the chinabay 2870s aren't performing like a genuine Garrett does. Phil had the same thing - 2870, 26psi and water injection producing less than 300whp/300wtq.
The setup looks good - good manifold, good exhaust, I like the retarded intake cam gear and all the rest of it, but something is lacking for sure.
I think it is what it is. The china turbo seems to spec close to the 2871, but maybe there is more to it than impellar/housing size. At least we are getting some data on these turbos. On a positive, the turbo only costs $300.
Maybe after a hardtop and 3.6 R&P I will venture into.
My IC piping is only 2", I don't know if that would be an issue. IAT was just shy of 100 degrees.
#9
I hit 298/296 on a mustand dyno with my inferior 1.6. I would add some water injection to your setup and go back.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
#16
Warm up was constantly adding 13% after it reached temp, so I figured I could just shut it off and add 13% to my ve table.
#20
Water injection is so easy buffon could do it.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote