Ultra short turbo drain line
#1
Ultra short turbo drain line
What are your suggestions for building a very short turbo drain line? The forged 45* AN fittings I just got in hopes of building something that isn't terrible are too long. Running the ARTech low mount manifold with a 2560 and trying to use the stock MSM drain location.
In this picture the bottom NPT-AN adapter is finger tight, a little room will be gained by snugging it up but not even close to what I need.
In this picture the NPT-AN adapter is removed and the 45* AN fitting held flush against the flange. Enough room there is not.
For the past year I ran a 45* socketless adapter on the turbo side to a hose barb on the pan side. It kind of worked, the hose is partially kinked and has collapsed on itself creating a massive restriction that I believe causes the turbo seals to leak at idle when the PCV vent doesn't route to the intake. Or in other words, the turbo seals leak oil at idle unless the crankcase has a vacuum. This condition has hidden just how poorly the turbo drains.
Swapping the NPT flanges out for male AN flanges will buy a small amount of room and look something like #2 above. There won't be much room for flex in a 1/4" long piece of hose.
Replace the turbo side 45 with a straight fitting and hope the hose doesn't kink? Braided hose has a better bend radius than the socketless I was using.
Hose barbs on both ends with some high temp hose?
Man up and drill the pan in a better spot?
In this picture the bottom NPT-AN adapter is finger tight, a little room will be gained by snugging it up but not even close to what I need.
In this picture the NPT-AN adapter is removed and the 45* AN fitting held flush against the flange. Enough room there is not.
For the past year I ran a 45* socketless adapter on the turbo side to a hose barb on the pan side. It kind of worked, the hose is partially kinked and has collapsed on itself creating a massive restriction that I believe causes the turbo seals to leak at idle when the PCV vent doesn't route to the intake. Or in other words, the turbo seals leak oil at idle unless the crankcase has a vacuum. This condition has hidden just how poorly the turbo drains.
Swapping the NPT flanges out for male AN flanges will buy a small amount of room and look something like #2 above. There won't be much room for flex in a 1/4" long piece of hose.
Replace the turbo side 45 with a straight fitting and hope the hose doesn't kink? Braided hose has a better bend radius than the socketless I was using.
Hose barbs on both ends with some high temp hose?
Man up and drill the pan in a better spot?
#4
Buy 2 straight barbed NPT fittings and 2 barbed 45* NPT fittings. And a foot of oil-safe rubber line. This way you have some options at hand when you go to "fabricate" the solution. And even with those fittings you might not need, you will still be at half the cost of one of those AN components.
#7
Buy 2 straight barbed NPT fittings and 2 barbed 45* NPT fittings. And a foot of oil-safe rubber line. This way you have some options at hand when you go to "fabricate" the solution. And even with those fittings you might not need, you will still be at half the cost of one of those AN components.
--Ian
#11
I welded an AN fitting onto my pan. You could do the same to that flanged NPT fitting or make your own flange to eliminate the adapter. Will using a barb at the CHRA then give you a reasonable length of hose to make the curve to the 45 at the pan? That's the place to use the barb since oil is not flowing into the face of the barb end. I used one there and never had it leak. Might consider using another metal than aluminum for the fittings with a hose section that short/rigid.
#12
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 33,556
Total Cats: 6,933
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
I keep looking at that first picture, and thinking that as much as I dislike press-fit hose in general, that it's the easy solution here without having to re-drill the pan, and it's not like it's going to be under pressure.
Remove the AN adapter from the turbo, and replace it with a straight hose barb. Or better yet, unscrew the flange from the turbo and replace it with one that has an integral barb fitting, such as this: http://www.treadstoneperformance.com...+5%2F8%22+Barb
Remove the AN adapter from the plate on the pan, and replace it with a 45° barb.
Find some reinforced hose rated for use with hot oil (example, or example) and install it between the two.
Remove the AN adapter from the turbo, and replace it with a straight hose barb. Or better yet, unscrew the flange from the turbo and replace it with one that has an integral barb fitting, such as this: http://www.treadstoneperformance.com...+5%2F8%22+Barb
Remove the AN adapter from the plate on the pan, and replace it with a 45° barb.
Find some reinforced hose rated for use with hot oil (example, or example) and install it between the two.
#13
For anyone who doesn't like puch-loc, you should try them out one day. I used it for my fuel system on my car. Looked into it, they are tested at 3x their rated pressure and can not leak/burst at that pressure. The stuff I used was rated at 350 PSI, meaning it can hold 1,000+ without a leak or burst. Good enough for me. Also once you install the hose onto the fitting (which is a huge pain BTW, like trying to put a 1/4" hose on a 3/8" barb...) it will never come off without a knife. You'd rip the hose before it slide off the hose barb.
#14
I also used pushloc/Socketless Aeroquip AQP hoses and love them.
I'm just not too convinced yet for e85 fuel applications.
I'd probably use the barb/silicone drain hose method versus AN. You will have far less radiant heat issues than mine, as my drain passes right next to a long runner manifold. Never had an issue.
I'm just not too convinced yet for e85 fuel applications.
I'd probably use the barb/silicone drain hose method versus AN. You will have far less radiant heat issues than mine, as my drain passes right next to a long runner manifold. Never had an issue.
#16
I also used pushloc/Socketless hoses and love them.
I'm just not too convinced yet for e85 fuel applications.
I'd probably use the barb/silicone drain hose method versus AN. You will have far less radiant heat issues than mine, as my drain passes right next to a long runner manifold. Never had an issue.
I'm just not too convinced yet for e85 fuel applications.
I'd probably use the barb/silicone drain hose method versus AN. You will have far less radiant heat issues than mine, as my drain passes right next to a long runner manifold. Never had an issue.
For OP, I'd use barb fittings/hose, and throw some fire sleeve over it for protection if needed.
#18
I've seen push loc fail. I would never use it for anything that is pressurized. So basically vent lines to a a catch can is the only thing I would ever use it for...
If barbed fittings and hose was kind of working before, then just get an appropriate sized spring and put it inside the hose. No more kinks.
If barbed fittings and hose was kind of working before, then just get an appropriate sized spring and put it inside the hose. No more kinks.
#19
SADFab Destructive Testing Engineer
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 18,642
Total Cats: 1,866
From: Beaverton, USA
I've seen push loc fail. I would never use it for anything that is pressurized. So basically vent lines to a a catch can is the only thing I would ever use it for...
If barbed fittings and hose was kind of working before, then just get an appropriate sized spring and put it inside the hose. No more kinks.
If barbed fittings and hose was kind of working before, then just get an appropriate sized spring and put it inside the hose. No more kinks.