High boost = moderate power?
#1
High boost = moderate power?
Hey everyone,
First off, I'm not at all complaining. My car is completely transformed and it's incredibly fun to drive. I get out of the car with my hands shaking even after a few weeks of driving boosted.
That being said, I wanted your thoughts on potential weaknesses in my setup, and why you think I'm making LESS POWER than is typically found in my setup.
Specs:
'93 1.6L - stock internals
GT2560 from a silvia @ 16psi
2" hot side, 2.5" cold side piping w/ small-ish CX racing intercooler
RX8 420cc injectors
2.5" straight pipe exhaust w/ Begi manifold and FM elbow/downpipe.
MS2PNP w/ AEM boost solenoid and Turbosmart 10psi wastegate actuator
FM stage 1 clutch w/13lb flywheel, stock 5sp, stock open diff ()
Dynapack numbers: 182tq/180hp
If you ask me, 16psi is on the high end. I've seen setups running way less make >200hp with the same turbo. I don't have any datalogs to show at the moment, so I'll probably get flamed for asking - but if you had to guess, what's causing my conservative numbers?
First off, I'm not at all complaining. My car is completely transformed and it's incredibly fun to drive. I get out of the car with my hands shaking even after a few weeks of driving boosted.
That being said, I wanted your thoughts on potential weaknesses in my setup, and why you think I'm making LESS POWER than is typically found in my setup.
Specs:
'93 1.6L - stock internals
GT2560 from a silvia @ 16psi
2" hot side, 2.5" cold side piping w/ small-ish CX racing intercooler
RX8 420cc injectors
2.5" straight pipe exhaust w/ Begi manifold and FM elbow/downpipe.
MS2PNP w/ AEM boost solenoid and Turbosmart 10psi wastegate actuator
FM stage 1 clutch w/13lb flywheel, stock 5sp, stock open diff ()
Dynapack numbers: 182tq/180hp
If you ask me, 16psi is on the high end. I've seen setups running way less make >200hp with the same turbo. I don't have any datalogs to show at the moment, so I'll probably get flamed for asking - but if you had to guess, what's causing my conservative numbers?
#2
SadFab CEO
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,560
Total Cats: 1,142
From: your mom's house phoenix, AZ
Just to add a data point:
I'm running a TD04-13T which is very similar to a 2560, if not slightly smaller. @12 PSI I'm making 210whp and 190wtq, also on a dyna pack. The only real difference is that I'm running a full 3" exhaust, which at our power levels, really should only limit spool and not so much peak power.
post the tune, and check for boost leaks
I'm running a TD04-13T which is very similar to a 2560, if not slightly smaller. @12 PSI I'm making 210whp and 190wtq, also on a dyna pack. The only real difference is that I'm running a full 3" exhaust, which at our power levels, really should only limit spool and not so much peak power.
post the tune, and check for boost leaks
#7
Generally speaking, most motors in decent shape and with a reasonable tune will make 60-70 lb-ft of dynojet torque per liter-atmosphere. So a 1.6L running 15 psi of boost at sea level should be 190-220 or so. HP then depends on how well it breathes at higher revs, but most stock cam MIatas make 1 to 1.2x the torque in horsepower.
So yes, I agree 182/180 is low. Some possible causes are:
- dyno out of calibration.
- motor is tired. Got compression test numbers?
- tune is excessively conservative on timing
--Ian
So yes, I agree 182/180 is low. Some possible causes are:
- dyno out of calibration.
- motor is tired. Got compression test numbers?
- tune is excessively conservative on timing
--Ian
#8
I definitely want a compression test. It was one of the things I said "**** it, we'll see" when doing the build (reason being I have a spare 1.6L sitting around that I would have swapped in at the first signs of trouble).
I'll definitely post my tune as well as some data logs in a few days, the car should be back on the road by tomorrow evening. Thanks for your feedback everyone
I'll definitely post my tune as well as some data logs in a few days, the car should be back on the road by tomorrow evening. Thanks for your feedback everyone
#9
I think your cold Side at 2.5" is too big for that turbo and 1600 but I shouldn't affect peak power. I agree numbers are way down. I doubt a clean running engine has compression that bad to be that low but best check anyway....I
'd say there is another issue. Are you sure your injectors aren't maxing out? 420 seems low for 220 HP in the real world.
Standard throttle body...?
Boost leak maybe....
'd say there is another issue. Are you sure your injectors aren't maxing out? 420 seems low for 220 HP in the real world.
Standard throttle body...?
Boost leak maybe....
#11
Timing curve retarded, boost leak on a small line, bov leak, small a/r turbine housing inflating boost numbers but hurting flow rates, timing belt off a tooth, crank pulley outer ring moved due to age and base timing is off a few degrees (common on 1.6).
Don't discount any of these without checking.
Don't discount any of these without checking.
#13
The last time I saw a high boost, low output situation was on a FD Rx7. It had a clogged cat. It boosted fine, everything looked and functioned fine, but it ran like ***. We took the down pipe off and chunks fell out. Check for exhaust restriction. I know you said "straight pipe" but that term varies in definition from person to person. Maybe your gasket is crooked, maybe you accidentally dropped a sybian attachment down there. Who knows? Also check timing. I have also seen proper boost with low power with the timing retarded a tooth.