DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Forged rods necessary ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2015 | 08:32 AM
  #1  
emarkey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 30
Total Cats: -61
Default Forged rods necessary ?

I have thrown a rod in my turbo 1.8 mk1 and am getting a new engine.
The plan is to get 250-300 hp with manley forged rods and a new thicker head gasket, plus an engine rebuild with new gaskets and seals and all that. I assume this would do it? I was making about 250-300hp when i threw the rod at 1.5bar, in 5th gear. (It was awesome, I won).
Any tips?
Old 10-23-2015 | 08:34 AM
  #2  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

Yes forged rods are 100% needed if you ever want to make 250-300whp reliably. The thicker head gasket is not needed, I honestly don't even know where you would find one for a miata. For all the gaskets you want to go OEM. They will cost a little bit more, but the quality is worth it. Replacing rear and front mains 6 months after you put the motor together because the shitty seals are leaking sucks major donkey dick.
Old 10-23-2015 | 09:56 AM
  #3  
emarkey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 30
Total Cats: -61
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Yes forged rods are 100% needed if you ever want to make 250-300whp reliably. The thicker head gasket is not needed, I honestly don't even know where you would find one for a miata. For all the gaskets you want to go OEM. They will cost a little bit more, but the quality is worth it. Replacing rear and front mains 6 months after you put the motor together because the shitty seals are leaking sucks major donkey dick.
Cool, thanks. You sure the thicker gasket won't be better by making less compression in the cylinders? I've heard a lot about how lower compression is better for turbo cars. And the gaskets are widely available. For instance, 949racing has them.
Old 10-23-2015 | 10:14 AM
  #4  
bahurd's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,387
Total Cats: 316
Default

For the 1/2 point drop in compression I'd save my money. IMHO
Old 10-23-2015 | 10:18 AM
  #5  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

I had not realized 949 sold different thickness HG. The amount of difference in the thickness will not matter enough to change your compression in any serious amount. If you are sticking with stock pistons, I would recommend finding factory 94 pistons as they are the lowest compression stock ones.
Old 10-23-2015 | 10:20 AM
  #6  
NBoost's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 153
Total Cats: -84
From: Canton, GA
Default

Originally Posted by emarkey
Cool, thanks. You sure the thicker gasket won't be better by making less compression in the cylinders? I've heard a lot about how lower compression is better for turbo cars. And the gaskets are widely available. For instance, 949racing has them.
Maybe 15-20 years ago when tuning software hadn't evolved into what it is now, and lowering compression in forced induction engines was used as a "safety buffer", But nowadays you are perfectly fine running 9:1, or even 10:1 for that matter.
Old 10-23-2015 | 11:26 AM
  #7  
albuquerquefx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 199
Total Cats: 31
From: Memphis, TN
Default

Thicker head gaskets also reduce quench area, the near-but-not-quite interference between the face of the piston and the flat surfaces of your cylinder head at the top of the combustion chamber.

Depending on who you believe, keeping the quench tight may provide anti-detonation capabilities due to epic turbulence created at TDC when the air and fuel mixture between the piston face and the flat parts of the head FORCE the mixture into the center of the chamber. The turbulence theoretically helps atomize stray "droplets" of fuel to avoid hot spots, and centers the resultant ignited charge over the piston center rather than allowing it to happen at the "edges".

There's a ****-ton of theory out there about quench and its usefulness, and while I do not buy ALLOFIT, the basis of the theory seems reasonable. In my ancient, shitty Tiburon build, I had Ross build me a custom set of forged 9.5:1 pistons which only dished at the center where the valve reliefs were cut. I then decked the block so that, when cold, the quench distance between piston face and the flat pads of the cylinder head combustion chambers were 0.035". Stock quench distance in that motor was roughly measured at 0.065", give or take. Thus, my decking of the block combined with the very slightly dished pistons ended up with a compression ratio that was damned-close to the stock 10.3:1.

With the expansion of the forged pistons under load, with the piston "rock" from the wall clearances along with the terrible 1.5:1 rod ratio geometry in that motor, the combined movement + expansion of the piston resulted in something closer to 0.010-0.015" clearance while running.

I could feed that motor timing for days, and it got really good gas mileage. It also had terrible blow-by because the piston-to-wall clearance was something absurd like 0.004" as defined by Ross for the power target I was aiming for.

That was probably way too much BlahBlahBlah from a n00b, but thought I'd at least offer.

I'd agree with the folks above; never go thicker head gasket.
Old 10-23-2015 | 11:57 AM
  #8  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Thicker head gaskets are only to be used if your custom pistons sit proud from the block at TDC. They are not to be used as a bandaid to lower compression.
Old 10-23-2015 | 03:53 PM
  #9  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21,117
Total Cats: 3,142
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by NBoost
Maybe 15-20 years ago when tuning software hadn't evolved into what it is now, and lowering compression in forced induction engines was used as a "safety buffer", But nowadays you are perfectly fine running 9:1, or even 10:1 for that matter.
Your fuel choice, power goals, and purpose for the car will dictate the best CR. Very generally speaking, E85 = 10:1 and sometimes more is fine. Pump 93 and <200whp street use = 9.5 or less. Pump 93 and >250whp street use = 9:1 or less. Obviously many variables effect these broad generalizations. Crappy gas, small turbo vs large, restrictive exhaust or not, small or large IC, aggressive timing or not, track or street, reroute or not, good radiator and ducting or not - these things would always effect my recommendations.

Edit: Running lower compression ratios allows you to more easily achieve MBT on detonation limited pump gas. It also allows you to bring more molecules of air and fuel into the combustion chamber without detonation at the same timing.
Old 10-24-2015 | 01:22 PM
  #10  
emarkey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 30
Total Cats: -61
Default

Thanks for all responses. Im going with engine rebuild and forged rods! That should do me.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Baxgordum
Miata parts for sale/trade
13
10-30-2015 08:42 AM
cyotani
Miata parts for sale/trade
9
10-26-2015 11:18 AM
Blayton
DIY Turbo Discussion
5
10-23-2015 11:13 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 AM.