EFR 6258 or GTX2867 twinscroll
#1
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
EFR 6258 or GTX2867 twinscroll
I am currently trying to figure out which turbo I want to use for my build and would like to hear some thoughts from the more experienced people. My car is my DD and will see some autox and track days but relatively few. I am looking for a turbo that will get me to my horsepower goal (340 at the crank or 300whp) while remaining efficient and give me the best lowend power possible. So far it has come down to these two turbos, the GTX2867 or the EFR 6258.
Here are the compressor maps for each.
According to my calculations (pls correct me if I am wrong) would place me just to the left of the center line in the third efficeincy island for the gtx and just to the right of the center line in the second efficeincy island for the EFR.
So far the borg looks better and is cheaper however the GTX offers the option to go twinscroll but I am not certain how much better the spool would really be. If I were to go EFR I would just get a manifold from ABE and get my downpipe modified as well as new intercooler pipes. The internal wastegate should be fine.
However with the gtx if I chose to go twinscroll the turbo would run me $300 more then the EFR then I would need 2 external waste gates, $550-$600, a twinscroll mani +$200 over normal and the other mods I mentioned.
So my question is whether twinscroll would be $1,100 better or if I should just go with the EFR6258. Maybe there is a better turbo option that I haven't even though of currently. I am open to any suggestions.
P.S. I have been learning a lot but still consider myself noob so sorry if any of this is incorrect.
Here are the compressor maps for each.
According to my calculations (pls correct me if I am wrong) would place me just to the left of the center line in the third efficeincy island for the gtx and just to the right of the center line in the second efficeincy island for the EFR.
So far the borg looks better and is cheaper however the GTX offers the option to go twinscroll but I am not certain how much better the spool would really be. If I were to go EFR I would just get a manifold from ABE and get my downpipe modified as well as new intercooler pipes. The internal wastegate should be fine.
However with the gtx if I chose to go twinscroll the turbo would run me $300 more then the EFR then I would need 2 external waste gates, $550-$600, a twinscroll mani +$200 over normal and the other mods I mentioned.
So my question is whether twinscroll would be $1,100 better or if I should just go with the EFR6258. Maybe there is a better turbo option that I haven't even though of currently. I am open to any suggestions.
P.S. I have been learning a lot but still consider myself noob so sorry if any of this is incorrect.
#3
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
thanks for the quick response. I kind of figured this would be the answer which is kind of a relief considerign the massive cost difference between the two. How long do you think this shortage might last?
#4
I make 200ft/lbs at 3k rpm with no spool helpers (VCIS not hooked up, stock head, stock cams, EBC configured to act as MBC)
https://www.miataturbo.net/showpost....&postcount=191
https://www.miataturbo.net/showpost....&postcount=191
#6
EFR6258 is also *SUPPOSED* to come in twin-scroll housing, but I don't think Borg Warner actually makes them yet.
http://www.speedforsale.com/nissangt...66p24hl1cs7qf7
http://www.speedforsale.com/nissangt...66p24hl1cs7qf7
#9
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
From: Tampa, Florida
I think if the price difference wasn't so vast I might just do that but the more I think about it the EFR 6258 is gonna give me the kind of performance I am looking for and is proven. I would rather not spend the massive money for the GTX if in the end it might underperform the EFR6258 in everyway
#20
I find this extremely interesting. The biggest thing I notice is where the peak efficiency islands fall. The BW turbo's peak efficiency is at considerably higher pressure ratios. I'm too rusty on my compressor design theory to provide any really useful analysis... more reading is required... but it seems to suggest more power can be made with less boost on the Garrett. Maybe someone who knows more than I do will care to comment?