Bw s252 hp
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Cackalackey
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
Bw s252 hp
Took it for a ride see link. 11 PSI how much HP could this produce? I know I will get criticism for asking but to all the experts in what HP range does this look like? Also want to share the greatness of MSII built by Rev. This is 2nd - 4 th.
Just take it easy on the bashing
01, Home made everything. Intercooled, Water meth, 3 inch DP. External wastegate . Cops and stock everything else.
Just take it easy on the bashing
01, Home made everything. Intercooled, Water meth, 3 inch DP. External wastegate . Cops and stock everything else.
Last edited by musanovic; 12-08-2011 at 10:36 PM.
#4
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
220-240whp depending on the weight of the car.
Very slow spool for that power level, by the way. I was expecting it to pull a lot harder after waiting for the thing to wind up for 1000+rpm.
Very slow spool for that power level, by the way. I was expecting it to pull a lot harder after waiting for the thing to wind up for 1000+rpm.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Cackalackey
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
Thanks for the feedback
http://www.mediafire.com/?s8uo9ecxjal9hdh
http://www.mediafire.com/?aaoo9v9acrg7fcc
#8
You want to run it a bit more rich upon or right before spoolup to help the turbo get up to speed quicker. Also I agree that 12.5 in boost is too lean even with water/meth. I'd aim for 12's flat at the very leanest. Also run more boost. If you want more torque/power its safer to achieve that way vs leaning out the mixture like crazy. That and those borgs really like higher boost so I'd bet itd be happier up there.
This looks VERY similar to what my car was doing on 7psi on the 3076
This looks VERY similar to what my car was doing on 7psi on the 3076
#11
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
The hell it does. Retune it ASAP or you're going to have your very own "look at all the pistons I melted" thread.
I don't think it's a very good idea to use boost level to describe engine strength.
I don't think it's a very good idea to use boost level to describe engine strength.
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North Cackalackey
Posts: 707
Total Cats: 2
Great input will retune to 11.7 asap. I want to keep driving it for a long time so boost will have to stay at 11psi. I will be extremely happy with 240-250 on stock motor considering what Oem output is. This is what it should feel like from the factory if you ask me. I am sarred to mess with timing further at this point.
Thanks for all the feedback
Thanks for all the feedback
#13
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 5,990
Total Cats: 361
Given how the engine output is estimated at 220-240whp, and torque should be around 230-240, he is already near the rod-bending torque range. So yes, if he is at 11psi now, he should def not go over 12psi on his setup (which suggests that I do know which turbo he uses). No need to be a semantics ****.
#14
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
Given how the engine output is estimated at 220-240whp, and torque should be around 230-240, he is already near the rod-bending torque range. So yes, if he is at 11psi now, he should def not go over 12psi on his setup (which suggests that I do know which turbo he uses). No need to be a semantics ****.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post