DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

1.6 or 1.8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2015 | 02:57 PM
  #1  
Slocus13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default 1.6 or 1.8

Hello,

I am trying to decide on my first project Miata.i am planning to adding a T25 turbo and using the car for autocross and fun. I have been looking on the forums trying to decide what is the better engine to do this to? Can anybody point me in a direction so I can decide. I know the 1.8 will have more power but is it a ton more? Is one engine able to handle the power better than another?

Thank you for your help and knowledge
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:03 PM
  #2  
Erat's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,690
Total Cats: 812
From: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Default

1.8

All 1.6 arguments are invalid.

/thread
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:07 PM
  #3  
Slocus13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

Why though? What makes the 1.8 so great? Not to sound rude I just want to know
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:11 PM
  #4  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

If you're building a motor, materials cost about the same. If anything there's more support for the 1.8. More torque. More power. More.
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:14 PM
  #5  
Slocus13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by psyber_0ptix
If you're building a motor, materials cost about the same. If anything there's more support for the 1.8. More torque. More power. More.
Thank you. I guess I need to decide on weather or not I want the more haha is it a ton more? I thought it was maybe 10 hp more
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:22 PM
  #6  
codrus's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,187
Total Cats: 859
From: Santa Clara, CA
Default

"There's no replacement for displacement". The 1.8 is 12% more displacement, and any mod you make to the 1.6 you can also make to the 1.8, it'll always be 12% ahead. That's ignoring other differences like there being better head geometry and VVT available in the 1.8 that were never put into the 1.6 (at least, not in the US).

The theoretical advantages of the 1.6 are slim:

- it's cheaper to use a working motor that's in the car than to swap over a 1.8. (note that this only applies as long as you're not making significant mods to it)

- the 1.6 is a bit lighter

- classing rules for some theoretical race class might favor less displacement

--Ian
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:39 PM
  #7  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21,117
Total Cats: 3,142
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

It's not just the engine. Do more research.

Diff, brakes, tps, chassis, axles, TB, torsen, AFM, intake ports, alternator, and interior parts are all improved. There's more.

1.8

/thread.
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
hornetball's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
From: Granbury, TX
Default

Do you already have a car? If not, starting with a 1.8 car is way better.
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:52 PM
  #9  
Slocus13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

I do not have the car already I am trying to decide which is the better base car to start with. I forgot about the diff on the 1.8
Old 10-15-2015 | 03:58 PM
  #10  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,194
Total Cats: 1,687
From: Charleston SC
Default

Find a 94 and start there, unless you like the look of the NB's better. Then get a 01-05 non-msm, for vvt goodness.

94-95.5 are OBDI and the easiest to get through emissions testing if you have that.
Old 10-15-2015 | 04:08 PM
  #11  
sixshooter's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21,117
Total Cats: 3,142
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

Did you forget about having to retrofit a variable TPS?

How about short nose crankshaft problems?
Old 10-15-2015 | 04:43 PM
  #12  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

Everything mentioned in this thread is irrelevant because it really boils down to the alternator. You don't hear anyone upgrading to a 1.6L alternator. 1.6L alternators are dink, ergo get a 1.8L. That's the only reason why a 1.8 is favored. Don't let these e-thugs yank you around.
Old 10-15-2015 | 04:53 PM
  #13  
SchmoozerJoe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 746
Total Cats: 85
From: Houston, TX
Default

I thought the 1.6 starter was the weak link?
Kind of offset by the superior 4.3 rear end ratio and all...
Old 10-15-2015 | 06:49 PM
  #14  
deezums's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,146
Total Cats: 201
From: Kansas
Default

If you are smart the cost of turbo between a 1.6 and 1.8 is the cost of the manifold, nearly every other thing on a stock bottom end build will swap over just fine.

There's still another $1500 in upgrades you probably need on a 1.6, 1K for a torsen swap, another 500 in clutch a 1.8 would need anyway.

My 1.6 car were nearly free, all salvage and ****. I have fun with it, spends less time busted than 1.8 power chasers...
Old 10-16-2015 | 01:14 AM
  #15  
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
From: Northern VA
Default

buuurned

i see what you did tere
Old 10-16-2015 | 08:56 AM
  #16  
Slocus13's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newb
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

Thank you for all the information guys!!
Old 10-16-2015 | 09:07 AM
  #17  
Braineack's Avatar
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 79,818
Total Cats: 4,152
From: Chantilly, VA
Default

the 1.6L is like Justin Bieber's *****; it's fine, but it's nothing special. It would take a lot of money to make perform as well a black man's from birth.
Old 10-16-2015 | 09:16 AM
  #18  
90civichhb's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 542
Total Cats: 36
Default

It depends on your starting car, cost, and goals.

I got a super cheap (almost free) 1.6L car with some crank wobble. You can buy good 1.6L motors all day long for like $200, running, with accessories. 1.8l motors tend to be a bit more expensive. The modding cost is roughly the same if you start with a base on both ends. I built an RX7 diff for my car with a total cost of about $250. This is the clutch type LSD which many here hate. I have also pieced an almost complete turbo/kit for roughly $1200. This process has taken me a bit over a year and has me on here looking for used parts about 3 times a day. With all that said the 1.6 is going to make decent power and be relatively inexpensive, but if I could do it over again. A 94 car with the torsen is what I would do.

Two piece axles, torsen, bigger motor, no AFM, better head...ect.
Old 10-21-2015 | 10:43 AM
  #19  
mx5-kiwi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 993
Total Cats: 57
From: Auckland, NZ
Default

I run and race a 1.6. ther is nothing wrong woth them, they are cheap and make oka power.

If you had a 1.6 already I would say carry on with what you've got BUT you dont, so I agree with the others. Start with the 1.8. for reasons mentioned above. Stronger AND Torsen Diff. Bigger clutch, better brakes, TPS etc.
Old 10-21-2015 | 12:14 PM
  #20  
Savington's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,104
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default

Nobody with a 1.8L wishes they had a 1.6L.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 AM.