When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm still waiting to see some kind of evidence it is a witch hunt.
I'm going to produce movie about the life of Andrew Kokoraleis, and cast an actor who is not a Satan-worshiping neo-**** serial killer, then arrange for the snowflakes to cry about how this is cultural appropriation or something like that.
Obviously that would depend on your definition of the word, but generally when the justice department appoints a special prosecutor they are given a pretty wide berth to investigate anything which falls within their official mandate, in this case:
Obviously that would depend on your definition of the word, but generally when the justice department appoints a special prosecutor they are given a pretty wide berth to investigate anything which falls within their official mandate, in this case:
again. How does the ruling disprove it's a witch hunt? It only proves it was constitutional for the attorney general to authorize one.
again. How does the ruling disprove it's a witch hunt?
I'm going to ask this question again:
What makes you (or anyone) think that a witch-hunt is occurring in the first place? You keep asking for people to disprove something which, so far as I can tell, doesn't even exist.
Being totally serious here. I think you're using hyperbole to expand the definition of "witch hunt" in a way which massively devalues the term. Kind of like how modern ultra-SJWs have devalued the word "rape" by applying it to "a cis-white male looked at me as I was walking down a public sidewalk."
SINCE THE NET NEUTRALITY REPEAL WAS ANNOUNCED, U.S. INTERNET SPEED HAS IMPROVED FROM THE 12TH BEST IN THE WORLD TO THE 6TH BEST
by Kevin Ryan
When FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced late last year that the so-called “net neutrality” regulations imposed during the Obama administration would be repealed, it set off a media firestorm. The left declared that your connection speed would be slowed significantly by internet service providers throttling back your service in order to extort higher fees out of you.
Chairman Pai, on the other hand, said ending the onerous regulations would increase private technological investment and boost speeds, which had been flat since net neutrality was imposed.
As you can see from the graph in this post, there was a definite upward bend in U.S. internet speed following the announcement. And data also shows increased technological investment by ISPs after the government said it would end the order regulating the internet as a public utility.
When you tell the private sector how much it has to charge or who it must or must not enter into customer agreements with, it stifles innovation. Only when a buyer and seller are fully free to decide the terms of sale do both parties benefit.
Those are some funny pictures.
Whites have been doing the "black face" thing since theater was introduced.
Michael Jackson was doing the "white face" thing, so what?
Posts like that to me are an example of people who give lip service to tolerance and understanding while actually being bigoted hate mongers.
If pressed that woman will probably try to make light of it by saying it is a joke or some sort of parody, which it very well could be.
What is actually happening on the woman's facebook post is public spewing of her hatred.
Makes me wonder what sort of person she is when face to face.
Personally I try to save my negative opinions to one person at a time rather than lumping a large group into one basket (police, whites, etc.)
On that personal note I feel that Hillary and Trump are both disgusting human beings with no redeeming value to humanity.
Both the democrats who claimed the overall internet would slow down as well as this Kevin Ryan guy are idiots. If you think speed tests are a good way of measuring the impact of (lack of) net neutrality, you clearly don't understand what it's about.
I'm not arguing with you, I'm asking Skamba why he believes the Mueller investigation to be a witch hunt. I'm not even sure if you have a point which you're trying to make, other than to cloud the issue with talk of quarters and photoshop. Are you asserting that the CNN article about the Mueller investigation contains something which is photoshopped?
The dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton admin and is the backbone of the entire investigation -- and absolutely nothing within it has been corroborated. It was completely fabricated in order to convince a judge to legally spy on Trump.
the dossier is the photoshopped article. keep up with the metaphors!
The dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton admin and is the backbone of the entire investigation -- and absolutely nothing within it has been corroborated. It was completely fabricated in order to convince a judge to legally spy on Trump.
the dossier is the photoshopped article. keep up with the metaphors!
So, wait... Because a document which suggests possible wrongdoing by the president was written by a democratic organization, it's automatically fake, and therefore, any investigation which stems from it is a witch-hunt?
Kinda curious how you'd have felt during the McCarthy investigations.
The dossier was bought and paid for by the Clinton admin and is the backbone of the entire investigation -- and absolutely nothing within it has been corroborated. It was completely fabricated in order to convince a judge to legally spy on Trump.
the dossier is the photoshopped article. keep up with the metaphors!
08-13-2018, 07:54 PM
0
