The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,339
Total Cats: 6,793
This is a good example of how the Republican party is mirroring the Democrat party, in becoming one of extremes.
How does saying that one is not a fan of the former president's character issues make someone a communist or a traitor?
Isn't having the freedom to publicly criticize elected officials kind of important? And also the sort of thing which is tends to be expressly forbidden in communist countries?
How does saying that one is not a fan of the former president's character issues make someone a communist or a traitor?
Isn't having the freedom to publicly criticize elected officials kind of important? And also the sort of thing which is tends to be expressly forbidden in communist countries?
This is a good example of how the Republican party is mirroring the Democrat party, in becoming one of extremes.
How does saying that one is not a fan of the former president's character issues make someone a communist or a traitor?
Isn't having the freedom to publicly criticize elected officials kind of important? And also the sort of thing which is tends to be expressly forbidden in communist countries?
How does saying that one is not a fan of the former president's character issues make someone a communist or a traitor?
Isn't having the freedom to publicly criticize elected officials kind of important? And also the sort of thing which is tends to be expressly forbidden in communist countries?
I mean, he is speaking his mind and so are the ones booing.
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,339
Total Cats: 6,793
It's more that I find this to be illustrative of how many mainstream Republicans are growing just as detached from reality (or, at least, from clear-headed reason) as the Democrats have been for some time.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
Do NOT politicize this virus!
EMAILS REVEAL THE CDC CHANGED ITS SCHOOL REOPENING GUIDANCE AFTER LOBBYING BY TEACHERS UNIONS
by Kevin Ryan
The CDC was ready to advise that it was safe to reopen schools in February, when instead America’s second-largest teachers union intervened and the guidance was changed.
That according to emails between the CDC, the White House, and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) that were uncovered by a Freedom of Information Act request.
• Jan. 29th - A “discussion” took place between the union and Biden administration officials during which time a draft of the upcoming CDC guidance on school reopenings was apparently given to the union.
• Feb. 1st - An email by the union’s senior director Kelly Trautner: “Thank you again for Friday’s rich discussion about forthcoming CDC guidance and for your openness to the suggestions made by our president, Randi Weingarten, and the AFT. We were able to review a copy of the draft guidance document over the weekend and were able to provide some initial feedback to several staff this morning about possible ways to strengthen the document,” Trautner wrote. She describes the union as the CDC’s “thought partner.”
The email was forwarded by Carole Johnson, the White House coronavirus testing coordinator, to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the CDC.
• Feb. 3rd - An email from union director Trautner to CDC Director Walensky: “We are immensely grateful for your genuine desire to earn our confidence and your commitment to partnership,” Trautner wrote.
• Feb. 7th - Emails show a call took place between the union’s president Randi Weingarten and CDC Director Walensky.
• Feb. 12th - The lobbying paid off. “Suggestions” offered by the union were adopted in the guidance, including two sections that were inserted nearly verbatim. The guidance also including a lengthy provision demanded by the union allowing remote work by certain teachers.
The CDC also stopped short of saying it was safe for all schools to reopen for in-person instruction. Instead, color-coded charts recommended that districts in “red” areas with “high” community spread (which it defined as 100 cases per 100,000) keep their middle and high schools closed to in-person learning. 99% of students lived in areas that fell within this definition of “high” community spread, and many of their schools had already been opened safely for months. It’s unclear whether the union lobbying influenced the charts, though it’s consistent with what the union was asking for.
“For politicians, parents and school leaders looking for a clear green light to reopen schools, this is not it,” NPR wrote after the guidance was released.
"CDC is not mandating that schools reopen," CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told reporters.
The final CDC guidance won high praise from the union. “Today, the CDC met fear of the pandemic with facts and evidence,” the union said in a Feb 12 press release.
At the time, the guidance gave unions coverage to continue their fight to keep schools closed in many large, Democratic-run cities.
And even today, 4% of U.S. school districts still remain completely closed to in-person learning, with another 48% still operating on a hybrid schedule.
by Kevin Ryan
The CDC was ready to advise that it was safe to reopen schools in February, when instead America’s second-largest teachers union intervened and the guidance was changed.
That according to emails between the CDC, the White House, and the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) that were uncovered by a Freedom of Information Act request.
• Jan. 29th - A “discussion” took place between the union and Biden administration officials during which time a draft of the upcoming CDC guidance on school reopenings was apparently given to the union.
• Feb. 1st - An email by the union’s senior director Kelly Trautner: “Thank you again for Friday’s rich discussion about forthcoming CDC guidance and for your openness to the suggestions made by our president, Randi Weingarten, and the AFT. We were able to review a copy of the draft guidance document over the weekend and were able to provide some initial feedback to several staff this morning about possible ways to strengthen the document,” Trautner wrote. She describes the union as the CDC’s “thought partner.”
The email was forwarded by Carole Johnson, the White House coronavirus testing coordinator, to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the head of the CDC.
• Feb. 3rd - An email from union director Trautner to CDC Director Walensky: “We are immensely grateful for your genuine desire to earn our confidence and your commitment to partnership,” Trautner wrote.
• Feb. 7th - Emails show a call took place between the union’s president Randi Weingarten and CDC Director Walensky.
• Feb. 12th - The lobbying paid off. “Suggestions” offered by the union were adopted in the guidance, including two sections that were inserted nearly verbatim. The guidance also including a lengthy provision demanded by the union allowing remote work by certain teachers.
The CDC also stopped short of saying it was safe for all schools to reopen for in-person instruction. Instead, color-coded charts recommended that districts in “red” areas with “high” community spread (which it defined as 100 cases per 100,000) keep their middle and high schools closed to in-person learning. 99% of students lived in areas that fell within this definition of “high” community spread, and many of their schools had already been opened safely for months. It’s unclear whether the union lobbying influenced the charts, though it’s consistent with what the union was asking for.
“For politicians, parents and school leaders looking for a clear green light to reopen schools, this is not it,” NPR wrote after the guidance was released.
"CDC is not mandating that schools reopen," CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told reporters.
The final CDC guidance won high praise from the union. “Today, the CDC met fear of the pandemic with facts and evidence,” the union said in a Feb 12 press release.
At the time, the guidance gave unions coverage to continue their fight to keep schools closed in many large, Democratic-run cities.
And even today, 4% of U.S. school districts still remain completely closed to in-person learning, with another 48% still operating on a hybrid schedule.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...VqxP9Ho04XC_8U
Schools Chancellor Meisha Ross-Porter called the test’s results, which showed that Asians made up 53.7% of the students admitted to specialized high schools in the city, “unacceptable,” according to the New York Post.“
I know from my 21 years as an educator that far more students could thrive in our Specialized High Schools, if only given the chance,” Ross-Porter said in a statement along with the results. “Instead, the continued use of the Specialized High School Admissions Test will produce the same unacceptable results over and over again, and it’s far past the time for our students to be fairly represented in these schools.”
White students made up 27.9% of the students admitted compared to 5.4% Hispanic and 3.6% black.
Supporters of the test have taken issue with Ross-Porter’s comments, including activists who represent Asian groups in the city.
“What is unacceptable is the targeting of one particular group,” Activist Wai Wah Chin said. “Especially with what we see happening on the streets of this city. What is unacceptable is telling Asians that they don’t belong in these schools despite their hard work.”
...
Schools Chancellor Meisha Ross-Porter
This is not racist. only white people can be racist.
NYC school administrator calls for end to elite high school exam after Asians dominate test scores
A New York City education administrator is calling for an end to a specialized high school entrance exam and lamenting new data that shows Asians dominating test scores.Schools Chancellor Meisha Ross-Porter called the test’s results, which showed that Asians made up 53.7% of the students admitted to specialized high schools in the city, “unacceptable,” according to the New York Post.“
I know from my 21 years as an educator that far more students could thrive in our Specialized High Schools, if only given the chance,” Ross-Porter said in a statement along with the results. “Instead, the continued use of the Specialized High School Admissions Test will produce the same unacceptable results over and over again, and it’s far past the time for our students to be fairly represented in these schools.”
White students made up 27.9% of the students admitted compared to 5.4% Hispanic and 3.6% black.
Supporters of the test have taken issue with Ross-Porter’s comments, including activists who represent Asian groups in the city.
“What is unacceptable is the targeting of one particular group,” Activist Wai Wah Chin said. “Especially with what we see happening on the streets of this city. What is unacceptable is telling Asians that they don’t belong in these schools despite their hard work.”
...
Schools Chancellor Meisha Ross-Porter
This is not racist. only white people can be racist.
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
“Look, I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I’m not trying to return to Reagan-Bush." —Mitt Romney, 1994
One of the biggest problems with the republican party/gop is dealing with the democrats who think they belong...
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,688
Total Cats: 4,113
Oh this is still fun:
Journalism 2021 edition: Publish a story based upon hearsay, tell it enough to become believable, then silently retract your statement with the cameras off so your base doesn’t hear it.
NYT, Washington Post, NBC News retract reports about Giuliani FBI 'warning'
Last edited by Braineack; 05-03-2021 at 02:07 PM.