99mx5 EFR build
#101
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
Thanks bro.
Today I flashed the ECU, installed the boost controller, boost gauge and MTX-L wideband. I also redid all of the wiring. I made a removable gauge panel for the glovebox. Also is a clearer pic of the engine bay.
Today I flashed the ECU, installed the boost controller, boost gauge and MTX-L wideband. I also redid all of the wiring. I made a removable gauge panel for the glovebox. Also is a clearer pic of the engine bay.
#103
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
LOL, At least the engine bay is clean.
I've been spending too much time under the car to clean it. The car is uncharacteristically dirty while I drive it around to tune it.
I took it around this evening to autotune it. Its running smoother as I go. It is currently limited to 10PSI with overboost protection with fuel cutoff. It pulls smoothly. I'm still autotuning idle and cruise cells. I have EGO and acceleration enrichment turned off.
I've been spending too much time under the car to clean it. The car is uncharacteristically dirty while I drive it around to tune it.
I took it around this evening to autotune it. Its running smoother as I go. It is currently limited to 10PSI with overboost protection with fuel cutoff. It pulls smoothly. I'm still autotuning idle and cruise cells. I have EGO and acceleration enrichment turned off.
#104
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
I have been having AFR fluctuations while autotuning for several days now with the autotune pulling fuel too much fuel and making it lean. Tonight I finally got to the root of the problem. The TPS was making "noise" and activating TPS-based enrichment. As soon as I changed the activation threshold out of the noise range, the AFRs stabilized and the idle was steady. I learned something new today, data logs are awesome!
Now to finally make a correct autotune.
Now to finally make a correct autotune.
#105
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
So far so good. The car idles well and accelerates well. My only issue is too much boost (for now). I decided to get the adjustable wastegate actuator from full race. I can change springs for more boost as needed.
#107
Awesome stuff. You only need one blockoff plate for the EGR. Block off the 2 ports where the EGR valve bolts on. The other single port won't leak.
You're running too much boost because of the stock 'medium boost' wastegate actuator right? How much boost is it running on the stock wastegate actuator? I don't want to bolt mine on to find out that it makes too much boost for my stock 04 motor.
Muoto, if this is an EFR 6258, the outlet of the turbine housing is a 3" compact v-band. 3.5" would probably be overkill if you're planning on a 2560.
You're running too much boost because of the stock 'medium boost' wastegate actuator right? How much boost is it running on the stock wastegate actuator? I don't want to bolt mine on to find out that it makes too much boost for my stock 04 motor.
Muoto, if this is an EFR 6258, the outlet of the turbine housing is a 3" compact v-band. 3.5" would probably be overkill if you're planning on a 2560.
#109
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
Thanks for the comments!
I am currently in contact with Full race and Forge about the actuator size to check for fitment. I plan to get the actuator with the 5+ spring and the extra spring kit.
You are right Bryce. I already made both plates, so I just blocked both of the EGR ports.
I I have not gone beyond 10 PSI at this point. I have the MS set to cut fuel at 10 PSI. It hits it really quickly. Stock block fail.
Muoto, I don't think there is a real need to go to 3.5" It will only make exhaust routing more difficult.
I am currently in contact with Full race and Forge about the actuator size to check for fitment. I plan to get the actuator with the 5+ spring and the extra spring kit.
You are right Bryce. I already made both plates, so I just blocked both of the EGR ports.
I I have not gone beyond 10 PSI at this point. I have the MS set to cut fuel at 10 PSI. It hits it really quickly. Stock block fail.
Muoto, I don't think there is a real need to go to 3.5" It will only make exhaust routing more difficult.
#116
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,653
Total Cats: 525
From: Las Cruces, NM
I removed the little "flow stopper" on the thermostat and made the bypass hole bigger. It will allow coolant flow while the car warms up. I planned to close the heater flow circuit after the car is warmed up, but this will prevent any problems in case I leave it closed on a cold start.